On being SEEN - NOTICED- LOOK!
Likes For Kevin R:
#53
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,122
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 1,445 Times
in
822 Posts
Bright clothes , flashing lights, reflective material.
Quote: 79pmooney ( "One of the issues with super bright strobes and the like is pissing motorists off. I for one as a driver do not like lights so bright I lose any semblance of night vision".)
I do not know about where you live, but where I am, a lot of motorists get pissed at bicyclists for no reason other than the fact that the bike is on the road. They do not care that bicyclists have the same legal right to be on that road. The thing that most increases a bicyclists safety is defensive, self awareness of what is going on around you at all times. Never assume the other person sees you and will cede the right of way when they are legally obliged to. This absolutely includes other bicyclists and pedestrians. It is crazy on our road infrastructure, and getting crazier.
Quote: 79pmooney ( "One of the issues with super bright strobes and the like is pissing motorists off. I for one as a driver do not like lights so bright I lose any semblance of night vision".)
I do not know about where you live, but where I am, a lot of motorists get pissed at bicyclists for no reason other than the fact that the bike is on the road. They do not care that bicyclists have the same legal right to be on that road. The thing that most increases a bicyclists safety is defensive, self awareness of what is going on around you at all times. Never assume the other person sees you and will cede the right of way when they are legally obliged to. This absolutely includes other bicyclists and pedestrians. It is crazy on our road infrastructure, and getting crazier.
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,004
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2502 Post(s)
Liked 745 Times
in
526 Posts
Bontrager, B&M, Cygolite et al have different motivations than yours truly. The light manufacturers are tasked with the mission of socially engineering a significant number of cyclists to use a product designed for nightime use during daylight hours. Why? Because the VAST number of cyclists do little or no riding at night. I'm certain Kevin is a Child of God and his motives are pure. Bontrager, less so I am afraid. Were they stand up engineers they would have admitted that daytime running lights don't achieve any greater daytime safety than hi-viz helmets and jerseys. For a cyclist that never rides at night, the need to buy an expensive head and tailight combo is ... zero.
#55
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,122
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 1,445 Times
in
822 Posts
I am going to continue to use my lights during daylight hours. Someone trying to convince me that there is a zero percent chance of it helping my visibility to others; be it motorists, cyclists or pedestrians, with or without data to support that theory, means absolutely nothing to me. My safety is up to me. If I think it helps, I am going to use it.
#56
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Trinidad West Indies
Posts: 32
Bikes: Raleigh Militis 3 Custom Build
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Bontrager, B&M, Cygolite et al have different motivations than yours truly. The light manufacturers are tasked with the mission of socially engineering a significant number of cyclists to use a product designed for nightime use during daylight hours. Why? Because the VAST number of cyclists do little or no riding at night. I'm certain Kevin is a Child of God and his motives are pure. Bontrager, less so I am afraid. Were they stand up engineers they would have admitted that daytime running lights don't achieve any greater daytime safety than hi-viz helmets and jerseys. For a cyclist that never rides at night, the need to buy an expensive head and tailight combo is ... zero.
To be honest I bought those lights because i wanted something VERY BRIGHT for use in daylight......In Trinidad cyclists dont get much respect and I am merely doing my part to ensure my safety.......along with wearing high visibility helmet and clothing /shoes......
I am well pleased with the lights; many have asked me about them and remarked at their brightness, I have noticed drivers tend to honk more often also; this helps with knowing they are behind me......
I wont try to hard sell my lights; bontrager didnt give me a discount
But i will say i feel that bit more safe; they work for me; and its my responsibility to ensure my safety.......at the end of the day there will always be irresponsible motorists out there; and heaven forbid any one of us should be run over.
Likes For Kevin R:
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,004
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2502 Post(s)
Liked 745 Times
in
526 Posts
I am going to continue to use my lights during daylight hours. Someone trying to convince me that there is a zero percent chance of it helping my visibility to others; be it motorists, cyclists or pedestrians, with or without data to support that theory, means absolutely nothing to me. My safety is up to me. If I think it helps, I am going to use it.
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times
in
349 Posts
I can tell you that my front light (flash mode) has prevented motorists from rolling through a stop sign on a side road, preventing a T-bone situation. I can see their faces when they roll up completely oblivious, because they are not looking for anything besides another car. They catch my light and slam on the brakes.
Likes For jadocs:
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,308
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4280 Post(s)
Liked 1,371 Times
in
952 Posts
Lights (particularly flashing) work where visible clothing doesn't (like when the cyclist is under tree cover and the following car is in bright sunlight).
The lights are also visible from farther away. And more easily recognized as a cyclist too.
You don't need "expensive" lights. You can get a set of lights that is sufficient for less than either a typical (not expensive) helmet or jersey.
Last edited by njkayaker; 07-02-19 at 08:15 PM.
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,308
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4280 Post(s)
Liked 1,371 Times
in
952 Posts
I can tell you that my front light (flash mode) has prevented motorists from rolling through a stop sign on a side road, preventing a T-bone situation. I can see their faces when they roll up completely oblivious, because they are not looking for anything besides another car. They catch my light and slam on the brakes.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,308
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4280 Post(s)
Liked 1,371 Times
in
952 Posts
Brightly colored clothing doesn't make a world of difference, especially compared to reflective high-vis attire.
https://youtu.be/mKc4qPm7FRI
https://youtu.be/mKc4qPm7FRI
Outside of that, reflectivity doesn't really work.
Likes For njkayaker:
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,004
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2502 Post(s)
Liked 745 Times
in
526 Posts
Whatever. I don't run my lights during the daytime and don't intend to. I could easily halve the life of my batteries by doing that. I buy decently priced battery packs and by not using them in the daytime their life is considerably longer. I may have told the story about walking on the street one night and coming to a corner where I waited for a car that was obviously going to turn across my path to do so. S/he did not. I was not wearing any kind of hi-viz. In fact I was coming from a gig and was entirely in black. In full darkness. On the sidewalk and yet I was visible to this motorist and they waited till I crossed before they made their turn. Drivers see what they need to see. When they don't it is because they are distracted for one reason or another. That's at night. In the daytime its even less likely that an alert driver will not see you regardless of what you are flashing or not flashing. Cyclists get hit because they did not properly interpret a drivers inattention. I do. If a driver sees me. Great. If s/he doesn't. No biggie. They are not going to get the chance to hit me. It's worked for me for decades. Best of all its cheaper than the cheapest knock-off strobe on Amazon.
Likes For Leisesturm:
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Whatever. I don't run my lights during the daytime and don't intend to. ... If a driver sees me. Great. If s/he doesn't. No biggie. They are not going to get the chance to hit me. It's worked for me for decades. Best of all its cheaper than the cheapest knock-off strobe on Amazon.
#65
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Trinidad West Indies
Posts: 32
Bikes: Raleigh Militis 3 Custom Build
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I wonder why they instituted daylight running lights on vehicles (relatively huge compared to bicycles) in Canada and USA?
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,838
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Liked 575 Times
in
436 Posts
Myself, I've experienced inability to discern shadows and colors when conditions are right ... with background patterns and colors, the nearby vehicle colors, shadows from lighting and buildings, and then a cyclist or motorcyclist. Even once didn't immediately (visually) pick up the back third of an 18-wheel big-rig truck backing out into a multi-lane road, due to the colors of the truck blending in perfectly with the background coloring/textures on the buildings at that spot.
Point is, it's hard to tell what a given driver's likely to see or not see, or whether one's inability to see something is due to inattentiveness or distraction or something else.
No matter how little or much lighting and color/contrast differences improve one's chances of a given person seeing those things, IMO it's a worthwhile consideration.
Fact is, with motor vehicles, all sorts of effort is put into requiring vehicles to have certain sizes, colors, contrasts with lights. That's not all done for zero reason. As others have suggested in the case of "running" lights on vehicles, it can aid in visually picking up the vehicle sooner rather than later.
Same would be the case with smaller vehicles.
Even to the point of aiding a runner. Having done tens of thousands of miles of running, back in the day, much of it in less-than-perfect lighting conditions, a runner can benefit hugely from being better-seen via the use of brighter clothing, better-contrasting clothing, reflectors, lights.
Of course, better odds of being seen might be for everyone.
But for those who value it, every little bit can help.
JMO
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,004
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2502 Post(s)
Liked 745 Times
in
526 Posts
A bicycle is a stationary object relatively speaking. It 'should' be operating as far to the right of the road as practicable. An oncoming vehicle should in no way be a danger to a bicycle that is operating per the vehicle code. A bike does not need to stand out to oncoming traffic because there is a buffer called the travel lane between oncoming traffic and a bicycle. As far as daylight rear lights, that is another ball of wax. IMO the best thing a cyclist can do for themselves is be as far out of the main path of motor traffic as is possible. Most drivers have visual acuity more than adequate to register the presence of a bicycle and rider ahead of them in daylight. I know many cyclists that are prepared to yield the right of way when BLAM. That is your cyclist who has just registered the presence of a car behind and starting to move over right to let the car pass. Too late, of course, the car was overtaking at 60mph. The cyclist was doing 17mph. The cyclist had no chance. The driver misjudged how quickly the cyclist could get out of his way and did not slow down. Tragic.
I don't wait till I register the presence of a car behind. It's too late then. I ride the fog stripe or to the right of it if there is a nice shoulder and overtaking traffic can slide right by. In more urban situations visibility is rarely an issue. I always yield to vehicles that outweigh me by tons. I check my speed at all intersections even if the light is mine. Several times in my life I've seen a car with its right turn indicator on come straight through the intersection at me! I KNOW that many cyclists seeing that indicator would take it as Gospel that the car will turn and not present a threat so they keep the hammer down and BLAM. Safety is about what YOU do. Not what drivers do. Drivers don't need to see me. I'd rather they didn't actually. When drivers see you, most are good hearted, they stop and wait, at bicycle speeds that could be a long wait. Drivers are mainly decent but dumb and lacking in judgement about things like bicycle dynamics. They should just get on with it and go, but they sit there fuming and getting frustrated because a car would have been long gone. Its stressful for them, stressful for me ... when they don't see you they behave much more naturally and you can anticipate their actions and work around them.
#69
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Trinidad West Indies
Posts: 32
Bikes: Raleigh Militis 3 Custom Build
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I don't know if you've ever driven in the US and Canada but there are "intersections" here where two highways may cross one another with no signalling. Think about it. An overcast day, a sports sedan, relatively low and moving VERY fast towards the intersection. Having headlights on does make the approaching sedan stand out that bit more and when you are talking about 60mph and more, every little bit can help.
A bicycle is a stationary object relatively speaking. It 'should' be operating as far to the right of the road as practicable. An oncoming vehicle should in no way be a danger to a bicycle that is operating per the vehicle code. A bike does not need to stand out to oncoming traffic because there is a buffer called the travel lane between oncoming traffic and a bicycle. As far as daylight rear lights, that is another ball of wax. IMO the best thing a cyclist can do for themselves is be as far out of the main path of motor traffic as is possible. Most drivers have visual acuity more than adequate to register the presence of a bicycle and rider ahead of them in daylight. I know many cyclists that are prepared to yield the right of way when BLAM. That is your cyclist who has just registered the presence of a car behind and starting to move over right to let the car pass. Too late, of course, the car was overtaking at 60mph. The cyclist was doing 17mph. The cyclist had no chance. The driver misjudged how quickly the cyclist could get out of his way and did not slow down. Tragic.
I don't wait till I register the presence of a car behind. It's too late then. I ride the fog stripe or to the right of it if there is a nice shoulder and overtaking traffic can slide right by. In more urban situations visibility is rarely an issue. I always yield to vehicles that outweigh me by tons. I check my speed at all intersections even if the light is mine. Several times in my life I've seen a car with its right turn indicator on come straight through the intersection at me! I KNOW that many cyclists seeing that indicator would take it as Gospel that the car will turn and not present a threat so they keep the hammer down and BLAM. Safety is about what YOU do. Not what drivers do. Drivers don't need to see me. I'd rather they didn't actually. When drivers see you, most are good hearted, they stop and wait, at bicycle speeds that could be a long wait. Drivers are mainly decent but dumb and lacking in judgement about things like bicycle dynamics. They should just get on with it and go, but they sit there fuming and getting frustrated because a car would have been long gone. Its stressful for them, stressful for me ... when they don't see you they behave much more naturally and you can anticipate their actions and work around them.
A bicycle is a stationary object relatively speaking. It 'should' be operating as far to the right of the road as practicable. An oncoming vehicle should in no way be a danger to a bicycle that is operating per the vehicle code. A bike does not need to stand out to oncoming traffic because there is a buffer called the travel lane between oncoming traffic and a bicycle. As far as daylight rear lights, that is another ball of wax. IMO the best thing a cyclist can do for themselves is be as far out of the main path of motor traffic as is possible. Most drivers have visual acuity more than adequate to register the presence of a bicycle and rider ahead of them in daylight. I know many cyclists that are prepared to yield the right of way when BLAM. That is your cyclist who has just registered the presence of a car behind and starting to move over right to let the car pass. Too late, of course, the car was overtaking at 60mph. The cyclist was doing 17mph. The cyclist had no chance. The driver misjudged how quickly the cyclist could get out of his way and did not slow down. Tragic.
I don't wait till I register the presence of a car behind. It's too late then. I ride the fog stripe or to the right of it if there is a nice shoulder and overtaking traffic can slide right by. In more urban situations visibility is rarely an issue. I always yield to vehicles that outweigh me by tons. I check my speed at all intersections even if the light is mine. Several times in my life I've seen a car with its right turn indicator on come straight through the intersection at me! I KNOW that many cyclists seeing that indicator would take it as Gospel that the car will turn and not present a threat so they keep the hammer down and BLAM. Safety is about what YOU do. Not what drivers do. Drivers don't need to see me. I'd rather they didn't actually. When drivers see you, most are good hearted, they stop and wait, at bicycle speeds that could be a long wait. Drivers are mainly decent but dumb and lacking in judgement about things like bicycle dynamics. They should just get on with it and go, but they sit there fuming and getting frustrated because a car would have been long gone. Its stressful for them, stressful for me ... when they don't see you they behave much more naturally and you can anticipate their actions and work around them.
I have driven in both countries, i appreciate your point.
#70
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
I will eat a delicate bodypart raw and without hot sauce if it is proven that the first poster to mention strobes was not referring to the common bicycle flasher (Strobus rectificus) by its Latin binomial. No commonly available cycling head or tail lights 'strobe', they 'flash', and they flash at rates accepted by medical experts to be minimally affecting of epileptic individuals. Get over it. Epilepsy as a reason for not flashing is a ship that has sailed. Your ticket is non-refundable. May as well use the thing. It may even save your life someday. But probably not. Wanna know what is even better for safety than decking yourself out like a First Responder? Spatial Awareness. I know you've heard of it. It's a thing. And a useful thing at that.
But for the sake of your first sentence... in the early '80s, at the height of all the really crappy incandescent lighting that was available for cyclists at the time, I did use, for a time, an actual strobe.
It was from a Navy MOB module, and I mounted the xenon flash tube on a short fiberglass rod, about 4 feet up from the rear rack of my bike. I rode some dark high speed roads, commuting late at night in those days... and really wanted to be seen.
I only did it for a while... the bright flash strobing on dark roads, while using a crappy headlight, was just too eerie for me to take.
I tried a lot of different "see me" schemes back in those days... finally settling on three Belt Beacons, arranged in a triangle, mounted on an aluminum plate, and wired together with one switch... this was mounted to the rails of my Brooks saddle, facing aft. For a headlight, I used a halogen lamp (high tech, at the time) wired to a Sanyo generator... which rode on the top of the rear tire, vice the sidewall. I had removed the Sanyo regulator circuit, and let the halogen have all the "juice" it wanted... which made it quite bright on downhill runs... which fortunately were short enough to not burn out the bulb. (I think the whole arrangement was somewhat mechanically self limiting, due to the friction of the generator... and my desire to not out ride my light.)
I used that for about 5 years or so... until a recharchable system, and eventually, Niterider came along.
But indeed, at one point, I did have a strobe.
Last edited by genec; 07-04-19 at 05:42 AM.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,815
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1592 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,025 Times
in
575 Posts
Most drivers have visual acuity more than adequate to register the presence of a bicycle and rider ahead of them in daylight. I know many cyclists that are prepared to yield the right of way when BLAM. That is your cyclist who has just registered the presence of a car behind and starting to move over right to let the car pass.
Makes perfect sense.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,308
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4280 Post(s)
Liked 1,371 Times
in
952 Posts
Pot...
... meet kettle.
I will eat a delicate bodypart raw and without hot sauce if it is proven that the first poster to mention strobes was not referring to the common bicycle flasher (Strobus rectificus) by its Latin binomial. No commonly available cycling head or tail lights 'strobe', they 'flash', ...
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,308
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4280 Post(s)
Liked 1,371 Times
in
952 Posts
I tend to this same rational approach. Yes it's true that headlights are more attention grabbing than no headlights and flashing is more attention grabbing still. But again, I don't care how much attention I grab - I want the driver to see me and register that I'm there, and those ARE two distinct things. For me it's not worth the downsides of flashing headlights (which I won't go into). The headlight might or might not be on during the day, usually not.
Flashing headlights say "cyclist" just like flashing rear lights do.
During the day, solid headlights are not bright enough to be very noticeable. Flashing makes them much more noticeable.
No one really cares what you choose to do, but the notion that one thing works (flashing rear lights) but something else that is the same sort of thing doesn't makes no sense.
Always flashing on the rear light - there's no need to over-complicate it.
- Flashing red light says "bicycle".
- Flashing LED lasts longer than steady.
- I don't care if the driver behind me can tell how fast I'm going.
- I don't care if he can accurately judge the distance from two blocks away.
- I want the driver to realize "bicycle ahead", anticipate, adjust his driving. The more time he has to do that, the better.
Last edited by njkayaker; 07-04-19 at 08:17 AM.
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,308
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4280 Post(s)
Liked 1,371 Times
in
952 Posts
There also other stuff going on.
What you are seeing is highly filtered.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inattentional_blindness
What you are seeing is highly filtered.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inattentional_blindness
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,308
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4280 Post(s)
Liked 1,371 Times
in
952 Posts
I may have told the story about walking on the street one night and coming to a corner where I waited for a car that was obviously going to turn across my path to do so. S/he did not. I was not wearing any kind of hi-viz. In fact I was coming from a gig and was entirely in black. In full darkness. On the sidewalk and yet I was visible to this motorist and they waited till I crossed before they made their turn. Drivers see what they need to see.
Most of the time, motorists see you. Recounting a single example of that doesn't mean they will always see/notice you.
Do you know what "anecdote" means?
Where they do need to stand out is at intersections, where a lot of collisions occur.
Last edited by njkayaker; 07-04-19 at 08:48 AM.