Raleigh Professional question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,122
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
110 Posts
Raleigh Professional question
Somebody said in the Forum that the 1973 "Professional" was "at the top of the pile in 1973", but "were certainly some equal but I don't think you can find a better racing bike from the era than that".
What is your opinion about this and which were the bikes equal or almost equal with the Professional?
What is your opinion about this and which were the bikes equal or almost equal with the Professional?
__________________
1992 Torelli Nitro Express; 1972 Claud Butler.
1992 Torelli Nitro Express; 1972 Claud Butler.
#2
~>~
Each had it's subtle ride/handling/sprint/descend/cornering idiosyncrasies but neither was "better" than the other.
I got some decent race results on either.
Both were factory mass produced,"hand made", machines with good quality control, excellent materials and solid design.
Many Italian frames of the period we built for customers were rife w/ poor quality control, bad finish and in need of alignment, BB facing, head milling and thread chasing.
When fought into complete status they were nice rides, but certainly not for me.
French machines like the early PX-10 were good bikes for lousy roads and long miles, which was not what the US racing scene offered.
Custom "Criterium" bikes were the epitome of the "hot set-up" in my day. Twitchy, rough riding and bespoke/expensive and often crashed but Cool/Trick.
Top of the Pile? In terms of real performance/race results it didn't really matter.
It's not about the hardware and never has been.
For a C&V race bike of the period today buy one that fits, that you like to look at.
Edit: The Raleigh Pro of the era was ridden to US National Road Championships in '72 & '73 by John Howard and in '74 by John Allis.
That would be the Top of Our Pile 3x.
-Bandera
Last edited by Bandera; 11-04-15 at 05:44 PM. Reason: Howard/Allis
#3
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
The Professional was the "top of the pile" in terms of models Raleigh offered. The Raleigh Team Professional (a completely different machine) was offered starting in 1974, and most folks would consider that as replacing the Professional at the top of the Raleigh pile.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#4
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,471 Times
in
1,435 Posts
What's your reason for asking? Are you thinking of acquiring one or getting rid of one? If you have one and like it, enjoy it. It's more valuable and better made than some bikes but less valuable and less well made than some other bikes. It's not the finest bike ever made, but you knew that, right?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,122
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
110 Posts
The reason is simple: learning. I am in this business only for four years. I try to focus on old steel road/touring bikes.
I don't have a Professional yet, but I want to make my lessons and when it shows up, to get it.
Last Saturday I found a Falcon with Reynolds 531 and Campagnolo and I didn't know if I should pay or not the money.
Anyway I have some bikes more or less valuable. But everything is for sale.
thank, Marius
I don't have a Professional yet, but I want to make my lessons and when it shows up, to get it.
Last Saturday I found a Falcon with Reynolds 531 and Campagnolo and I didn't know if I should pay or not the money.
Anyway I have some bikes more or less valuable. But everything is for sale.
thank, Marius
__________________
1992 Torelli Nitro Express; 1972 Claud Butler.
1992 Torelli Nitro Express; 1972 Claud Butler.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times
in
78 Posts
It's a good enough question. And needs no justification in my view.
When I walked into the bike shop in 1971 to purchase a bike, the top shelf bikes they had were;
Cinelli Super Corsa
Pogliaghi Italcorse
Masi Cran Criterium
None of which I could afford.
And the Raleigh Professional.
Which I couldn't quite afford either. Though I really wanted one.
I placed it one notch down from the Italian bikes, for no particular reason
other than it was was cheaper than those 3. A fine bicycle by any measure.
When I walked into the bike shop in 1971 to purchase a bike, the top shelf bikes they had were;
Cinelli Super Corsa
Pogliaghi Italcorse
Masi Cran Criterium
None of which I could afford.
And the Raleigh Professional.
Which I couldn't quite afford either. Though I really wanted one.
I placed it one notch down from the Italian bikes, for no particular reason
other than it was was cheaper than those 3. A fine bicycle by any measure.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,520
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 1,769 Times
in
635 Posts
I would say these where about the best of the bikes for there era that where realistic in terms of price and availability. They where typically about the nicest of the bikes that dealerships actually stocked.
#8
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,471 Times
in
1,435 Posts
They were in a sweet spot in value for some. I preferred somewhat less expensive stuff like the Peugeot PX-10 and below but you wouldn't be crazy to pay full value for a Raleigh Professional.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#9
Senior Member
It's a good enough question. And needs no justification in my view.
When I walked into the bike shop in 1971 to purchase a bike, the top shelf bikes they had were;
Cinelli Super Corsa
Pogliaghi Italcorse
Masi Cran Criterium
None of which I could afford.
And the Raleigh Professional.
Which I couldn't quite afford either. Though I really wanted one.
I placed it one notch down from the Italian bikes, for no particular reason
other than it was was cheaper than those 3. A fine bicycle by any measure.
When I walked into the bike shop in 1971 to purchase a bike, the top shelf bikes they had were;
Cinelli Super Corsa
Pogliaghi Italcorse
Masi Cran Criterium
None of which I could afford.
And the Raleigh Professional.
Which I couldn't quite afford either. Though I really wanted one.
I placed it one notch down from the Italian bikes, for no particular reason
other than it was was cheaper than those 3. A fine bicycle by any measure.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times
in
78 Posts
It took me long enough to save up my $234 or whatever it was, for my PX-10.
Four hundred bucks for a Pro? I just couldn't swing it.
I STILL can't afford one! heh.
Four hundred bucks for a Pro? I just couldn't swing it.
I STILL can't afford one! heh.
#11
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,326 Times
in
837 Posts
In 1971 retail price, and everyone paid retail, was what $350-400. And that was just crazy money for a bicycle. I remember Raleigh Pros would sometimes sit all year in the bike shop showroom. The same bike, just so few that would actually spend that kind of money. And it was the 20 something year old recreational cyclist that would buy it eventually. I can't recall anyone over 30 years of age riding a bike back in the 70's. Times have changed for sure.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#12
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,326 Times
in
837 Posts
As to "which bike is best?" -- the most important component is still the man or woman sitting on the saddle.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#13
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,658
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 2,528 Times
in
1,058 Posts
Think of it in terms of Tour de France mountain categories. The Peugeot PX-10, Schwinn Paramount and Raleigh Pro were all Category 1 bikes. The high-zoot marques from across the Atlantic were hors categorie, at least in people's perceptions.
As has been stated, the best bikes you were likely to see in the flesh in your hometown bike shop were the Paramount, the Pro and the PX-10. Especially true of the Paramount - Schwinn dealerships blanketed the country, and many of them kept a Paramount on display. Many a Raleigh dealer had a Pro on display and many a Peugeot dealer had a PX-10 hanging up, but there were fewer such dealerships, at least in small-town America.
Outside a few select markets, seeing a Cinelli or a Masi or even a Lejeune, to name but three examples, was unlikely.
As has been stated, the best bikes you were likely to see in the flesh in your hometown bike shop were the Paramount, the Pro and the PX-10. Especially true of the Paramount - Schwinn dealerships blanketed the country, and many of them kept a Paramount on display. Many a Raleigh dealer had a Pro on display and many a Peugeot dealer had a PX-10 hanging up, but there were fewer such dealerships, at least in small-town America.
Outside a few select markets, seeing a Cinelli or a Masi or even a Lejeune, to name but three examples, was unlikely.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#14
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Think of it in terms of Tour de France mountain categories. The Peugeot PX-10, Schwinn Paramount and Raleigh Pro were all Category 1 bikes. The high-zoot marques from across the Atlantic were hors categorie, at least in people's perceptions.
As has been stated, the best bikes you were likely to see in the flesh in your hometown bike shop were the Paramount, the Pro and the PX-10. Especially true of the Paramount - Schwinn dealerships blanketed the country, and many of them kept a Paramount on display. Many a Raleigh dealer had a Pro on display and many a Peugeot dealer had a PX-10 hanging up, but there were fewer such dealerships, at least in small-town America.
Outside a few select markets, seeing a Cinelli or a Masi or even a Lejeune, to name but three examples, was unlikely.
As has been stated, the best bikes you were likely to see in the flesh in your hometown bike shop were the Paramount, the Pro and the PX-10. Especially true of the Paramount - Schwinn dealerships blanketed the country, and many of them kept a Paramount on display. Many a Raleigh dealer had a Pro on display and many a Peugeot dealer had a PX-10 hanging up, but there were fewer such dealerships, at least in small-town America.
Outside a few select markets, seeing a Cinelli or a Masi or even a Lejeune, to name but three examples, was unlikely.
Does this make them better bicycles? Perhaps not, but the cache is there for some.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 2,977
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 4 Rival; 2014 Cannondale Trail 7 29; 1972 Schwinn Suburban, 1996 Proflex 756, 1987(?) Peugeot, Dahon Speed P8; 1979 Raleigh Competition GS; 1995 Stumpjumper M2 FS, 1978 Raleigh Sports, Schwinn Prologue
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Isn't inflation funny? A PX-10 for for under $300? Less than $500 for top of the line Raleigh? You want something top of the line now, expect to pay $4000+
Now if I could only find a new/barely used PX-10 for $250....hmmm
Now if I could only find a new/barely used PX-10 for $250....hmmm
#16
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times
in
866 Posts
The Raleigh Pro for a time distinguished itself by being a volume production bike with Record sidepulls, at a relatively low price.
Software is still ery buggy today a manycharactrs are elete upon typigtem thisis get software I have o say.
Hell outthere?
Software is still ery buggy today a manycharactrs are elete upon typigtem thisis get software I have o say.
Hell outthere?
#17
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,658
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 2,528 Times
in
1,058 Posts
Interesting analogy, but PX-10s were actually raced in major events (doesn't get more major than the Tour de France) by well-known European professional teams. I'm not sure the same can be said about the other two models.
Does this make them better bicycles? Perhaps not, but the cache is there for some.
Does this make them better bicycles? Perhaps not, but the cache is there for some.
As for PX-10s winning the Tour de France, query whether Roger Pingeon's win in 1967 was on a PX-10 or some custom that was built by a master and painted to look like a PX-10. I don't know the answer to that, but it was a common enough practice at the time that one cannot just assume that Peugeot made the bike. I recall having read many moons ago that Bernard Thevenet actually rode Peugeot-built PX-10s and PY-10s, including in his two TdF victories. Whatever he was riding certainly did not hold him back in 1075 or 1977.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 604
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
I raced in High School back in the mid 70s. I rode a Peugeot UO-8, until I upgraded to a PX-10 (pretty much when I started driving, so the biking went out the window until recently)
Here's a youtube I posted elsewhere on C+V - to give you an idea of the vibe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENK_BKPmI7o
Popular bikes were Raleigh Grand Prix, Fuji S-10-S, a few Raleigh Grand Sports + Comps (the black one with Campy GS), A couple Motobecanes and Bianchis. One guy had a Sekine, which we all proceeded to call a Zucchini - but Nothing with Campy Record components
BUT a couple guys were really good - they went out of state to race - maybe some type of national championship?. Anyway, these guys got the Raleigh Pros, with the full Campy NR setup - and we were all very jealous - they were beautiful machines
Here's a youtube I posted elsewhere on C+V - to give you an idea of the vibe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENK_BKPmI7o
Popular bikes were Raleigh Grand Prix, Fuji S-10-S, a few Raleigh Grand Sports + Comps (the black one with Campy GS), A couple Motobecanes and Bianchis. One guy had a Sekine, which we all proceeded to call a Zucchini - but Nothing with Campy Record components
BUT a couple guys were really good - they went out of state to race - maybe some type of national championship?. Anyway, these guys got the Raleigh Pros, with the full Campy NR setup - and we were all very jealous - they were beautiful machines
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
The Raleigh Pro was the most expensive bike in the shop where I worked, but they only sold Raleighs, Peugeots and Columbias. Nobody bought a Pro while I was there and the only PX10 sold was sold to me. Very few adults bought bikes for themselves. They bought bike for their kids.
#20
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,471 Times
in
1,435 Posts
Bike shops that cater to Joe and Jane Average hang a topline model from the ceiling (or wherever) to build credibility for the shop and the brand. It's not so much to make money.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#21
Senior Member
Sooo.... Did you buy it?
#22
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
The Raleigh Pro was the most expensive bike in the shop where I worked, but they only sold Raleighs, Peugeots and Columbias. Nobody bought a Pro while I was there and the only PX10 sold was sold to me. Very few adults bought bikes for themselves. They bought bike for their kids.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,122
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
110 Posts
So Raleigh Pro, Schwinn Paramount and Peugeot PX-10 were like the most popular bikes.
I have the PX-10, a project actually.
It is a Pro for sale for 500$, but is not original and the price is too high for what I want to spend.
I have the PX-10, a project actually.
It is a Pro for sale for 500$, but is not original and the price is too high for what I want to spend.
__________________
1992 Torelli Nitro Express; 1972 Claud Butler.
1992 Torelli Nitro Express; 1972 Claud Butler.
#24
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Not the most owned, but they were the top of their respective "lines". Way more Grand Prix, Varsities and U-08's were sold.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#25
Senior Member
But as others have said, in the 60's and 70's, bikes were sold mostly to school kids and college students. All of these top end bikes were out of the financial reach of most of them. A new 1970 Chevy Nova would have cost $2200 so spending almost 20% of that on a "toy" would have been out of the question for the average person.