Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

LeMond's New Carbon Bikes

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

LeMond's New Carbon Bikes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-20, 01:44 PM
  #26  
gsa103
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,400

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 754 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Het Volk
One counter: A steel frame is the optimal frame for a commuter bike, given its ability to stand-up to wear and tear of urban cycling. So when you say "less than an aluminum frame" I would argue ALU is a worse material. And with the e-assist, weight is less of a concern. But I get your point.

However - I worry that the benefits of commuting by bike (exercise) is being lost by people basically just riding motorized scooters, which use coal powered electricity to recharge.
NY Times has a great graphic on this: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...-election.html

BLUF: Unless you're living in W. Va, most of your electricity is not from coal. Coal is being rapidly phased out by natural gas, wind and solar (exact mix depends on the state).

Honestly, the weakest point of an ebike is not the frame, it's the motor and battery. There are no standards for how a mid-motor integrates into the frame, it's manufacturer & model (Shimano, Yamaha, Bosch, etc) specific. When the motor dies in a 10-yr old eBike, the entire bike is going to be junk. Standardized motor interfaces would go along way to keeping these running, but we can't see to get manufacturers to agree on a standard for a simple bottom-bracket, I'm not optimistic.
I think the short answer is that eBikes realistically have a 10-yr lifespan, at which point they'll be scrapped and the frames tossed.
gsa103 is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 02:05 PM
  #27  
Germany_chris
I’m a little Surly
 
Germany_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422

Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times in 647 Posts
Originally Posted by Het Volk
One counter: A steel frame is the optimal frame for a commuter bike, given its ability to stand-up to wear and tear of urban cycling. So when you say "less than an aluminum frame" I would argue ALU is a worse material. And with the e-assist, weight is less of a concern. But I get your point.

However - I worry that the benefits of commuting by bike (exercise) is being lost by people basically just riding motorized scooters, which use coal powered electricity to recharge.
Here's a happy video from 2013 with a founder of Niner bikes hitting a carbon and steel fork with a 16oz hammer


If you don't want to watch the spoiler is the CF fork survives and the steel doesn't. I ride steel only to include forks because it makes me look back while walking away but that doesn't mean that CF is bad it just means it's not for me. CF can be built for the pro peloton and it can be built for bob the commuter there aren't restrictions like there are with metal.
Germany_chris is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.