Finally I'm a CyclingSavvy graduate!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Finally I'm a CyclingSavvy graduate!
My wife and I attended the CyclingSavvy course in St. Louis this past Friday and Saturday, something I've been wanting to do ever since I heard about the course over 2 years ago. We did the classroom session on Friday evening, and then the parking lot drills Saturday morning, and the Tour of St. Louis ride in the afternoon. Weather couldn't have been better, with a mix of sun and clouds and temps in the upper 70's. In June!
I thoroughly enjoyed the course. I was definitely the most experienced cyclist in attendance. Pretty much everyone else (all women other than one woman's 15 y.o. son) were beginners of some level or another. Even though I've been putting CS principles into practice for a couple of years now, there was still more to learn.
For those who think CS teaches dogmatic vehicular cycling, you are absolutely mistaken. CS is geared towards transportation cycling (which is why I'm posting in the Commuting forum), but the principles can be used by anyone and everyone who rides on public roads, for any reason. What CS does is try to identify and convey what the hazards are on public roads, and then teach principles that can be used to avoid those hazards, avoid crashes, as much as possible. You may prefer bike lanes, or quiet side streets, and that's just fine. But sometimes you might have to use part of a larger, busier road to connect the smaller roads you want to be on. CS teaches you how to safely and EASILY traverse those larger roads without any problems from motorists or anyone else. Maybe you even prefer to use the sidewalk for a short distance. With CS you're better equipped to recognize the hazards of sidewalk riding, so that you can still make it safely to your destination.
For example, we went from the mall parking lot on the right here, through 3 traffic lights under this massive interchange, and turned left onto another side street (Eager Road). https://goo.gl/maps/n2DYH Using CS principles it was quite easy. One of the ladies who goes through this area in her car every day even said it was LESS stressful on her bike than it is in her car. And there was just as much traffic with the mall as there is on a weekday rush hour.
I learned some new techniques such as "right on green", meaning waiting to turn right until the light turns green (move left in the lane to let right on red motorists by you, if you want). This gives you an almost empty road which is useful if you have a left turn coming right up. Much easier than turning right into the right lane and then having to negotiate through adjacent lanes with passing traffic.
I would highly recommend CyclingSavvy to anyone who uses their bike for transportation, or for any purpose really. It can and does change people's lives.
I thoroughly enjoyed the course. I was definitely the most experienced cyclist in attendance. Pretty much everyone else (all women other than one woman's 15 y.o. son) were beginners of some level or another. Even though I've been putting CS principles into practice for a couple of years now, there was still more to learn.
For those who think CS teaches dogmatic vehicular cycling, you are absolutely mistaken. CS is geared towards transportation cycling (which is why I'm posting in the Commuting forum), but the principles can be used by anyone and everyone who rides on public roads, for any reason. What CS does is try to identify and convey what the hazards are on public roads, and then teach principles that can be used to avoid those hazards, avoid crashes, as much as possible. You may prefer bike lanes, or quiet side streets, and that's just fine. But sometimes you might have to use part of a larger, busier road to connect the smaller roads you want to be on. CS teaches you how to safely and EASILY traverse those larger roads without any problems from motorists or anyone else. Maybe you even prefer to use the sidewalk for a short distance. With CS you're better equipped to recognize the hazards of sidewalk riding, so that you can still make it safely to your destination.
For example, we went from the mall parking lot on the right here, through 3 traffic lights under this massive interchange, and turned left onto another side street (Eager Road). https://goo.gl/maps/n2DYH Using CS principles it was quite easy. One of the ladies who goes through this area in her car every day even said it was LESS stressful on her bike than it is in her car. And there was just as much traffic with the mall as there is on a weekday rush hour.
I learned some new techniques such as "right on green", meaning waiting to turn right until the light turns green (move left in the lane to let right on red motorists by you, if you want). This gives you an almost empty road which is useful if you have a left turn coming right up. Much easier than turning right into the right lane and then having to negotiate through adjacent lanes with passing traffic.
I would highly recommend CyclingSavvy to anyone who uses their bike for transportation, or for any purpose really. It can and does change people's lives.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
I didn't even know there was such a course. I would recommend it too to any beginner rider.
#3
Unlisted member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 6,192
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1376 Post(s)
Liked 432 Times
in
297 Posts
That's cool! I took the Motorcycle Safety Foundation class when I learned to ride and then took the experienced rider class several years later. I'm extremely grateful to have been able to have learned this way, and understand your gratitude here.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Cycling saavy is pure VC dogma. For example:
One of the advantages of cycling for transportation is that people cycling often have the legal option to ride on sidewalks, in crosswalks, on turf/dirt, and in between lanes. Any organization that seeks to limit this freedom of movement harms cycling advocacy.
The rules are written for and by motorists and their enforcement is typically motorist-centric. Moreover, bike-specific traffic statutes are often discriminatory, contradictory, and/or intentionally vague. IMO, cyclists should prioritize safety over car-centric traffic statutes.
Many states have different rules and there is essentially no evidence that these differences make people "more likely to be hit by a car" or that "they are disruptive and breed animosity among fellow road users."
This mushy language calls for people to play chicken with multi-ton machines driven by people who typically face no legal consequence for hitting, injuring, or killing vulnerable traffic. A perfect recipe for 0.5% mode share for ever.
Elitist macho BS. And I'm being polite.
Victim blaming. Its not the job of vulnerable traffic to communicate to people sealed hermetically in multi-ton metal machines. It's the job of drivers to pay the %^&* attention.
A vague title that hides more VC extremism:
Of course it does...because bike lanes are dangerous things that will kill you if you do not ride like a car. /sarcasm
More fear mongering. In OR cyclists have the legal right to pass on the right and many, many thousands do so safely every day.
There are so many other options than just sucking on a tail pipe.
Car head.
Car head.
Cycling savvy is asking people who bike to give up their legal right of way to placate some hypothetical angry minority of people driving. I am legal vulnerable traffic and I will use the quickest and most expeditious route while also being considerate to the right of way of other road users (and especially vulnerable pedestrians).
1) Ride on the road.
Adult bicyclists do not belong on the sidewalk.
Adult bicyclists do not belong on the sidewalk.
2) Know and follow the rules.
The rules of the road are for everyone. They exist to make us all predictable to one another.
The rules of the road are for everyone. They exist to make us all predictable to one another.
Bicyclists who violate the rules are not only far more likely to be hit by a car, they are disruptive and breed animosity among fellow road users.
3) Integrate in the intersections.
4) Ride Big.
5) Communicate.
6) Be mindful of your surroundings.
This often means leaving a bike lane
Passing a queue of stopped traffic on the right can expose you to many crash hazards.
Sometimes it’s better just to wait in the queue.
8) Want respect? Act respectably.
When motorists arrive before you at a red light, stop behind them. Don’t pull to the front of the queue
Cycling savvy is asking people who bike to give up their legal right of way to placate some hypothetical angry minority of people driving. I am legal vulnerable traffic and I will use the quickest and most expeditious route while also being considerate to the right of way of other road users (and especially vulnerable pedestrians).
Last edited by spare_wheel; 06-30-15 at 02:47 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I agree with sparewheel, its elitist dogma indoctrination.
By placing artificial limitations, and arbitrary demands on ones choices, it alienates those who don't possess the boldness, and athletic abilities to pull it off......which is most people who aren't already cycling enthusiasts.
By placing artificial limitations, and arbitrary demands on ones choices, it alienates those who don't possess the boldness, and athletic abilities to pull it off......which is most people who aren't already cycling enthusiasts.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 239
Bikes: Yuba Mundo 4.3, 2007 Jake the Snake
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 239
Bikes: Yuba Mundo 4.3, 2007 Jake the Snake
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Cycling saavy is pure VC dogma. For example:
One of the advantages of cycling for transportation is that people cycling often have the legal option to ride on sidewalks, in crosswalks, on turf/dirt, and in between lanes. Any organization that seeks to limit this freedom of movement harms cycling advocacy.
The rules are written for and by motorists and their enforcement is typically motorist-centric. Moreover, bike-specific traffic statutes are often discriminatory, contradictory, and/or intentionally vague. IMO, cyclists should prioritize safety over car-centric traffic statutes.
Many states have different rules and there is essentially no evidence that these differences make people "more likely to be hit by a car" or that "they are disruptive and breed animosity among fellow road users."
This mushy language calls for people to play chicken with multi-ton machines driven by people who typically face no legal consequence for hitting, injuring, or killing vulnerable traffic. A perfect recipe for 0.5% mode share for ever.
Elitist macho BS. And I'm being polite.
Victim blaming. Its not the job of vulnerable traffic to communicate to people sealed hermetically in multi-ton metal machines. It's the job of drivers to pay the %^&* attention.
A vague title that hides more VC extremism:
Of course it does...because bike lanes are dangerous things that will kill you if you do not ride like a car. /sarcasm
More fear mongering. In OR cyclists have the legal right to pass on the right and many, many thousands do so safely every day.
There are so many other options than just sucking on a tail pipe.
Car head.
Car head.
Cycling savvy is asking people who bike to give up their legal right of way to placate some hypothetical angry minority of people driving. I am legal vulnerable traffic and I will use the quickest and most expeditious route while also being considerate to the right of way of other road users (and especially vulnerable pedestrians).
One of the advantages of cycling for transportation is that people cycling often have the legal option to ride on sidewalks, in crosswalks, on turf/dirt, and in between lanes. Any organization that seeks to limit this freedom of movement harms cycling advocacy.
The rules are written for and by motorists and their enforcement is typically motorist-centric. Moreover, bike-specific traffic statutes are often discriminatory, contradictory, and/or intentionally vague. IMO, cyclists should prioritize safety over car-centric traffic statutes.
Many states have different rules and there is essentially no evidence that these differences make people "more likely to be hit by a car" or that "they are disruptive and breed animosity among fellow road users."
This mushy language calls for people to play chicken with multi-ton machines driven by people who typically face no legal consequence for hitting, injuring, or killing vulnerable traffic. A perfect recipe for 0.5% mode share for ever.
Elitist macho BS. And I'm being polite.
Victim blaming. Its not the job of vulnerable traffic to communicate to people sealed hermetically in multi-ton metal machines. It's the job of drivers to pay the %^&* attention.
A vague title that hides more VC extremism:
Of course it does...because bike lanes are dangerous things that will kill you if you do not ride like a car. /sarcasm
More fear mongering. In OR cyclists have the legal right to pass on the right and many, many thousands do so safely every day.
There are so many other options than just sucking on a tail pipe.
Car head.
Car head.
Cycling savvy is asking people who bike to give up their legal right of way to placate some hypothetical angry minority of people driving. I am legal vulnerable traffic and I will use the quickest and most expeditious route while also being considerate to the right of way of other road users (and especially vulnerable pedestrians).
I agree with you about bike laws being discriminatory. That's why FTR laws and 3FP laws need to be repealed and replaced with full lane rights for cyclists, with no exceptions.
Until you have been through the class, stop making ASSumptions.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,050
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sounds really interesting @PatrickGSR94. I'm doing something similar later this month. It's a course with the League of American Bicyclists, Traffic Safety 101. After that I'm planning to do their course to become a League certified instructor. I'm hoping this will make me a more effective volunteer at the co-op. Really looking forward to it!
#13
Senior Member
I heard a famous basketball coach (don't remember his name as I don't follow sports much) tell a story once. He was at some sort of conference for coaches, and while he was standing around between sessions someone introduced him to John Wooden (famous UCLA basketball coach). He was a bit star struck, but Coach Wooden started chatting with him and discussing some of the upcoming sessions. He was amazed that as successful a coach as Wooden was going to sessions and listening to presentations, always interested in learning. A great lesson that I carry with me, there is always something new to learn. I am on the list for a cycling savvy class at our club and looking forward to it.
#14
commuter and barbarian
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Potomac, MT, USA
Posts: 2,494
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I heard a famous basketball coach (don't remember his name as I don't follow sports much) tell a story once. He was at some sort of conference for coaches, and while he was standing around between sessions someone introduced him to John Wooden (famous UCLA basketball coach). He was a bit star struck, but Coach Wooden started chatting with him and discussing some of the upcoming sessions. He was amazed that as successful a coach as Wooden was going to sessions and listening to presentations, always interested in learning. A great lesson that I carry with me, there is always something new to learn. I am on the list for a cycling savvy class at our club and looking forward to it.
You may learn something you didn't know. You may not.
In all likelihood, there is something of value in it, even if one doesn't agree with all of it.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Sounds really interesting @PatrickGSR94. I'm doing something similar later this month. It's a course with the League of American Bicyclists, Traffic Safety 101. After that I'm planning to do their course to become a League certified instructor. I'm hoping this will make me a more effective volunteer at the co-op. Really looking forward to it!
TS101 is a good class for general cycling-related topics, but for transportational cyclists I think CS really hits it out of the park.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Oh, sorry, its a trick question hat has no legitimate answer
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
Maybe you can enlighten us as to what right and rules you think Patrick was talking about then we can have a discussion about those.
#18
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
The differences between CS and LAB are purely political and that's fine. You can't go wrong with either course.
Any commuter or utilitarian cyclist would benefit their safety by taking either one.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
LAB's TS101 teaches some of the same principles about lane control, also. Do you dogmatically oppose them, also?
My TS101 instructor used the Street Smarts booklet written by John S. Allen, and *surprise* he's a CS instructor also!
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I didn't read in his paragraph that he was supporting illegal riding to control others, if that is his agenda then he needs to explain himself, but I didn't get that from the paragraph. Cyclists do have rules and rights, just as motorists do and are the same as motorists with the exception that cyclists are to ride as far right as they safely can when not keeping up with the flow of traffic, and if you break those rules then you get penalized if you get caught.
Maybe you can enlighten us as to what right and rules you think Patrick was talking about then we can have a discussion about those.
Maybe you can enlighten us as to what right and rules you think Patrick was talking about then we can have a discussion about those.
*1 Riding a bicycle like its a bicycle in accordance with its strengths and weaknesses to best match conditions and ones abilities.
*2 Driving a bicycle like its a car despite its strengths and weaknesses even when contrary to conditions and ones abilities.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Where are you getting this "illegal" stuff from? When a lane is too narrow to share (almost all travel lanes), I control it by not riding at the edge and making it clear that a lane change is required to pass. On a 2-lane road if I'm on a blind hill or curve, or I can see oncoming traffic that the motorist behind me may not see, I motion for them to stay back until it's safe so they don't try something stupid. What makes you think that is illegal? It's about safety for all road users.
LAB's TS101 teaches some of the same principles about lane control, also. Do you dogmatically oppose them, also?
My TS101 instructor used the Street Smarts booklet written by John S. Allen, and *surprise* he's a CS instructor also!
LAB's TS101 teaches some of the same principles about lane control, also. Do you dogmatically oppose them, also?
My TS101 instructor used the Street Smarts booklet written by John S. Allen, and *surprise* he's a CS instructor also!
Ones duty and responsibility is to their own actions, traffic control is for those duly authorized to engage in those activities. Ride where you choose, but don't try to make those choices for other road users.
#22
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I'm getting a little cognitive dissonance here. You whine about cyclists giving up their legal right of way, but tell them they shouldn't be getting in the way of cars.
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I agree with you about bike laws being discriminatory. That's why FTR laws and 3FP laws need to be repealed and replaced with full lane rights for cyclists, with no exceptions.
#24
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
If not VC dogma/agenda derived, what was/is the source of the Cycling Savvy course information about "various crash risk"?
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
i defend the right of people to bicycle drive* or to flow through traffic in a more organic style but teaching these styles of cycling as default techniques is elitist and, imo, harmful to more widespread adoption of cycling.
*still think sucking tail pipe is nucking futs but no direct harm no foul...
Last edited by spare_wheel; 07-01-15 at 09:13 AM.