X1 Groupsets
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
X1 Groupsets
I am considering getting an x1 groupset for my next road bike.
Anyone with experience in them? I see only advantages, but what do I know...
Thanks
Anyone with experience in them? I see only advantages, but what do I know...
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,496
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
I haven't seen anyone selling groupsets yet or any complete bikes being sold with it yet. The disadvantages I see are the gear spread on the cassettes to have a wide enough range if you have any kind of hills to climb and possibly weight of the cassette vs weight of say a 11-28 + front shifting parts
#3
Mostly harmless
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
+ no frond shifter and derailleur (lower weight and no thinking about shifting up front)
Disadvantages:
- smaller gear ratio range with bigger gaps between adjacent gears
- more cross chaining and no BIG front chainring (so shorter drivetrain lifetime)
- more expensive
Unless racing in mud, it's fashion, more than any consievable advantage IMO.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 238
Bikes: 2015 Spec Roubaix Expert, 2016 Spec Diverge Expert X1, 2018 Allez Sprint eTap
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
If you're referring to the SRAM X1 road group set, for example, then I do have experience with it, although I wouldn't call myself a group set "expert", so take what I say with a grain of salt I recently purchased a 2016 Specialized Diverge Expert X1, which you can see here:
https://specialized.com/us/en/bikes/...pert-x1/107072
It comes with a SRAM Force 1 46-tooth crankset, and has the 11-speed SRAM Force 1 10-42 cassette. I purchased this bike because I was intrigued by the generally very positive gravel bike reviews of owners, but was interested in trying out SRAM and their X1 group set. And plus, I happened to really like the bike's color scheme LOL (yeah, I'm shallow like that haha).
My only real point of comparison is my 2015 Specialized Roubaix SL4 Expert, which is equipped with the excellent and butter-smooth Ultegra group set. Gear-wise, it's got the 34/50 crankset and 11-32 cassette, which I have really grown to love since I do lots of climbing. So the granny gear gives me a 1.0625:1 ratio, while the highest gear gives me a 4.55:1 ratio. All in all, a pretty respectable range.
So when it came time to purchase my gravel bike, I was relieved to see that the ratio range for the Diverge Expert X1 goes from 1.095:1 (granny gear) and 4.6:1 (highest gear), which is pretty close to my Roubaix. Of course, I only have a choice of 11 ratios instead of 22, but to be honest I haven't really missed them.
And here's the kicker (although this goes outside of your question): While I was perfectly fine and accepted I'd be slower with this bike, given its bigger/heavier wheels and given that the bike weighs about 3 lbs more than my Roubaix, in practice I have not been *any* slower!!! This was truly a shock to me, and no it's not due to the Diverge having disc brakes LOL (before any clown tries to bring that up as a possible explanation). I am feeling it a bit more in the legs, after a ride, however...
Anyway, SRAM double tap shifters are definitely interesting with their much-more mechanical feel than Ultegra. I'm not ready to call one better than the other, and I'm just happy to have the chance to experience both on a regular basis Another difference: I had read about SRAM's X1 setup not having any "chain slap", and that's certainly been my experience so far. I get it all the time on my Roubaix, but have yet to get it with my Diverge. Not a big deal either way as far as I'm concerned, but maybe that's something you care about.
Let me know if there's anything else you were curious about, but hope the above is of any help to somebody.
Geoff
https://specialized.com/us/en/bikes/...pert-x1/107072
It comes with a SRAM Force 1 46-tooth crankset, and has the 11-speed SRAM Force 1 10-42 cassette. I purchased this bike because I was intrigued by the generally very positive gravel bike reviews of owners, but was interested in trying out SRAM and their X1 group set. And plus, I happened to really like the bike's color scheme LOL (yeah, I'm shallow like that haha).
My only real point of comparison is my 2015 Specialized Roubaix SL4 Expert, which is equipped with the excellent and butter-smooth Ultegra group set. Gear-wise, it's got the 34/50 crankset and 11-32 cassette, which I have really grown to love since I do lots of climbing. So the granny gear gives me a 1.0625:1 ratio, while the highest gear gives me a 4.55:1 ratio. All in all, a pretty respectable range.
So when it came time to purchase my gravel bike, I was relieved to see that the ratio range for the Diverge Expert X1 goes from 1.095:1 (granny gear) and 4.6:1 (highest gear), which is pretty close to my Roubaix. Of course, I only have a choice of 11 ratios instead of 22, but to be honest I haven't really missed them.
And here's the kicker (although this goes outside of your question): While I was perfectly fine and accepted I'd be slower with this bike, given its bigger/heavier wheels and given that the bike weighs about 3 lbs more than my Roubaix, in practice I have not been *any* slower!!! This was truly a shock to me, and no it's not due to the Diverge having disc brakes LOL (before any clown tries to bring that up as a possible explanation). I am feeling it a bit more in the legs, after a ride, however...
Anyway, SRAM double tap shifters are definitely interesting with their much-more mechanical feel than Ultegra. I'm not ready to call one better than the other, and I'm just happy to have the chance to experience both on a regular basis Another difference: I had read about SRAM's X1 setup not having any "chain slap", and that's certainly been my experience so far. I get it all the time on my Roubaix, but have yet to get it with my Diverge. Not a big deal either way as far as I'm concerned, but maybe that's something you care about.
Let me know if there's anything else you were curious about, but hope the above is of any help to somebody.
Geoff
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,551
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Love my 1x setup on the gravel bike, however please know that their are gaps in the ratios and if you are not comfortable at different cadences you will not like it. Most people that don't like it is because they can't or don't like to change their cadence, I'm running a 38 chainring and a 11-36 in the back.
#6
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
You don't need a full xx1 groupset. You need a rear hub and a front chainring designed for being used without a fr der.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,496
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
Advantages:
+ no frond shifter and derailleur (lower weight and no thinking about shifting up front)
Disadvantages:
- smaller gear ratio range with bigger gaps between adjacent gears
- more cross chaining and no BIG front chainring (so shorter drivetrain lifetime)
- more expensive
Unless racing in mud, it's fashion, more than any consievable advantage IMO.
+ no frond shifter and derailleur (lower weight and no thinking about shifting up front)
Disadvantages:
- smaller gear ratio range with bigger gaps between adjacent gears
- more cross chaining and no BIG front chainring (so shorter drivetrain lifetime)
- more expensive
Unless racing in mud, it's fashion, more than any consievable advantage IMO.
#8
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times
in
1,187 Posts
I have a road bike with a 50/34 compact crank and a 11-28 cassette along with a gravel bike with a 40T crank and a 11-32 cassette.
If you live in a relatively flat area then a X1 road bike can work. But if you have hills and flats, then you really want a compact crank.
If you live in a relatively flat area then a X1 road bike can work. But if you have hills and flats, then you really want a compact crank.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,496
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
I have a road bike with a 50/34 compact crank and a 11-28 cassette along with a gravel bike with a 40T crank and a 11-32 cassette.
If you live in a relatively flat area then a X1 road bike can work. But if you have hills and flats, then you really want a compact crank.
If you live in a relatively flat area then a X1 road bike can work. But if you have hills and flats, then you really want a compact crank.
#10
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times
in
1,187 Posts
Yes, you can have the same ratios at the extremes, but large gaps between gears. While a 2x11 does not give you 22 gears, it give you small gaps between gears.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Chainring wear is definitely a factor to consider. In addition to typically lower tooth count to spread the load, narrow/wide rings "work" by having a very close fit with the chain. As a result, wear degrades performance much sooner than it does on derailleur chainrings. I like the 1x setup on my CX bike, but I wouldn't want to switch my road bike over.
#12
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,642
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4739 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
Chainring wear is definitely a factor to consider. In addition to typically lower tooth count to spread the load, narrow/wide rings "work" by having a very close fit with the chain. As a result, wear degrades performance much sooner than it does on derailleur chainrings. I like the 1x setup on my CX bike, but I wouldn't want to switch my road bike over.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Tooth count on the chainring is generally in between a compact's large and small (eg. 42-46 teeth). Isn't wear just a matter of saying that yes, your ring will wear twice as fast, but on only 1 ring; versus half as fast applied to 2 rings? ie. is lifetime replacement cost going to even out either way?
Now, my experience is CX, so maybe road is more tolerant of chainring wear (since situations where you need high chain retention are less common). Still, when you're making a list of pros/cons, it's one that should be included.
#14
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times
in
1,187 Posts
A Force 1 chainring is $60, a chain is $27, so for $100 you can replace both.
BTW... tires wear also and need to be replaced from time to time.
BTW... tires wear also and need to be replaced from time to time.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you for the replies.
This document:
https://www.sram.com/sites/all/theme...l_Guide_EN.pdf
claims that an x1 with 44T x 10-42 has 97.5 % of the range of an x2 50/34T x 11-32
That's pretty good since I usually ride 11-28.
This document:
https://www.sram.com/sites/all/theme...l_Guide_EN.pdf
claims that an x1 with 44T x 10-42 has 97.5 % of the range of an x2 50/34T x 11-32
That's pretty good since I usually ride 11-28.
#16
Senior Member
Range wise is fine. Whether you can live with the gear spacing or not is up to you (or you could get close spacing but lose range.) I personally think it doesn't look too bad. When riding rolling hills I often find myself shifting 2-3 gears at a time fairly frequently anyway.
#18
Mostly harmless
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
Thank you for the replies.
This document:
https://www.sram.com/sites/all/theme...l_Guide_EN.pdf
claims that an x1 with 44T x 10-42 has 97.5 % of the range of an x2 50/34T x 11-32
That's pretty good since I usually ride 11-28.
This document:
https://www.sram.com/sites/all/theme...l_Guide_EN.pdf
claims that an x1 with 44T x 10-42 has 97.5 % of the range of an x2 50/34T x 11-32
That's pretty good since I usually ride 11-28.
I'd always prefer a triple with 8 speeds at the back, to any 1x, or even 2x system for that matter. That's in terms of both range, tight gearing and component wear. Well, price as well. A lot cheaper and more durable drivetrain.
As far as 50-34 goes - I like having a chainring around 40 teeth for flats. 34 is too small, 50 asks for a lot of cross chaining when not going fast. Not the combo I'd be happy width. The point is - 50-34 gives range and tight gearing, but using it all in real life can be a hassle. 32-46 double, or a triple are better options IMO.
Last edited by Bike Gremlin; 05-07-16 at 02:13 AM.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It must be a matter of taste because as others have said I often find I shift several gears at the same time, or in quick succession. so bigger jumps will actually mean fewer shifts for me. Then again I don't do really steep climbs much.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you're riding flats, rather than hills, close gear ratios should be especially important. I don't see why you would shift multiple gears at a time if you ride on flats.
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Flats should not be a problem with
X1 Cogs: 10-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32-36-42
Now I have 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,22,25,28
Where I ride usually it's not completely flat, but with gentle rolling slopes, I rarely shift once only. I have always found single-step granularity too close. Double-step will save me a lot of shifting. I just don't have the need for such close gearing between extremes.
X1 Cogs: 10-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32-36-42
Now I have 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,22,25,28
Where I ride usually it's not completely flat, but with gentle rolling slopes, I rarely shift once only. I have always found single-step granularity too close. Double-step will save me a lot of shifting. I just don't have the need for such close gearing between extremes.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Flats should not be a problem with
X1 Cogs: 10-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32-36-42
Now I have 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,22,25,28
Where I ride usually it's not completely flat, but with gentle rolling slopes, I rarely shift once only. I have always found single-step granularity too close. Double-step will save me a lot of shifting. I just don't have the need for such close gearing between extremes.
X1 Cogs: 10-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32-36-42
Now I have 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,22,25,28
Where I ride usually it's not completely flat, but with gentle rolling slopes, I rarely shift once only. I have always found single-step granularity too close. Double-step will save me a lot of shifting. I just don't have the need for such close gearing between extremes.
I think X1 will work with a 13 speed cassette but it's too bad we have to wait out the transition from 11 to 12 to 13, which will take a significant amount of time.
I won't touch a X1 off road either. SRAM's relentless attempt to push 1X onto everything is just embarrassing. Shimano's 2X off road groups have far wider range with tighter ratios.
Plus, SRAM's shifting is clunky and unrefined. Not to mention their prices are just as high, if not higher than shimano's. Higher prices for clunkier shifting, wide gaps between gears and crappy brakes: what a bargain!
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You can have either range, or tight gearing with 1x system. Can't have both, even with 12 sprockets at the back.
I'd always prefer a triple with 8 speeds at the back, to any 1x, or even 2x system for that matter. That's in terms of both range, tight gearing and component wear. Well, price as well. A lot cheaper and more durable drivetrain.
As far as 50-34 goes - I like having a chainring around 40 teeth for flats. 34 is too small, 50 asks for a lot of cross chaining when not going fast. Not the combo I'd be happy width. The point is - 50-34 gives range and tight gearing, but using it all in real life can be a hassle. 32-46 double, or a triple are better options IMO.
I'd always prefer a triple with 8 speeds at the back, to any 1x, or even 2x system for that matter. That's in terms of both range, tight gearing and component wear. Well, price as well. A lot cheaper and more durable drivetrain.
As far as 50-34 goes - I like having a chainring around 40 teeth for flats. 34 is too small, 50 asks for a lot of cross chaining when not going fast. Not the combo I'd be happy width. The point is - 50-34 gives range and tight gearing, but using it all in real life can be a hassle. 32-46 double, or a triple are better options IMO.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oops. This thread has outlived its usefulness. So quickly too. There is nothing but a rapid descent coming now into ridiculous religious attitudes on x1 groupsets... of all things. Who needs that?
I am outta here for a ride on my x1 Santa Cruz with a 10-42 cassette, which is far better than reading what's coming... I love animals, people not so much.
Thanks for the replies. Vayan con dios.
I am outta here for a ride on my x1 Santa Cruz with a 10-42 cassette, which is far better than reading what's coming... I love animals, people not so much.
Thanks for the replies. Vayan con dios.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jackmen
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
6
07-24-16 08:10 AM
phread59
Mountain Biking
13
08-02-13 08:22 PM