Pedal threads: why really?
#1
Road Runner
Thread Starter
Pedal threads: why really?
Everyone knows (or discovers to their detriment!) that the right-side pedal has right-hand threads and the left pedal left-hand threads. Many times, even in repair manuals, it gives the explanation that it has to do with the direction you pedal and the keeping the pedals tight.
But this is demonstrably not so. If your pedal is loose and your pedal bearing is stiff, pedaling in the forward direction will unscrew the pedal, not tighten it. In fact, I use this as a lazy way to unscrew the pedals with the bike on a stand: break them loose, hold the inner shoulder by the flats, and pedal the crank forwards to back them out.
So is there a known valid reason for the opposite threads, or is it something that's just become a standard over the years?
(BTW, anyone remember when some cars had left-hand threads on the left-side wheel lugs? I almost broke off a stud trying to change a tire on my '55 Chrysler before thinking to try the reverse direction.)
But this is demonstrably not so. If your pedal is loose and your pedal bearing is stiff, pedaling in the forward direction will unscrew the pedal, not tighten it. In fact, I use this as a lazy way to unscrew the pedals with the bike on a stand: break them loose, hold the inner shoulder by the flats, and pedal the crank forwards to back them out.
So is there a known valid reason for the opposite threads, or is it something that's just become a standard over the years?
(BTW, anyone remember when some cars had left-hand threads on the left-side wheel lugs? I almost broke off a stud trying to change a tire on my '55 Chrysler before thinking to try the reverse direction.)
#2
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,866
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 2,930 Times
in
1,495 Posts
Everyone knows (or discovers to their detriment!) that the right-side pedal has right-hand threads and the left pedal left-hand threads. Many times, even in repair manuals, it gives the explanation that it has to do with the direction you pedal and the keeping the pedals tight.
But this is demonstrably not so. If your pedal is loose and your pedal bearing is stiff, pedaling in the forward direction will unscrew the pedal, not tighten it. In fact, I use this as a lazy way to unscrew the pedals with the bike on a stand: break them loose, hold the inner shoulder by the flats, and pedal the crank forwards to back them out.
So is there a known valid reason for the opposite threads, or is it something that's just become a standard over the years?
(BTW, anyone remember when some cars had left-hand threads on the left-side wheel lugs? I almost broke off a stud trying to change a tire on my '55 Chrysler before thinking to try the reverse direction.)
But this is demonstrably not so. If your pedal is loose and your pedal bearing is stiff, pedaling in the forward direction will unscrew the pedal, not tighten it. In fact, I use this as a lazy way to unscrew the pedals with the bike on a stand: break them loose, hold the inner shoulder by the flats, and pedal the crank forwards to back them out.
So is there a known valid reason for the opposite threads, or is it something that's just become a standard over the years?
(BTW, anyone remember when some cars had left-hand threads on the left-side wheel lugs? I almost broke off a stud trying to change a tire on my '55 Chrysler before thinking to try the reverse direction.)
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#3
Mechanic/Tourist
In short it's about the actual forces on the pedal when operating normally, as opposed to what you note when it's frozen. Rather explaining the physics here I'll refer you to Google. Reverse pedal thread, left hand pedal thread, why bike pedal thread reversed, etc - any of those should work.
...and btw rotating the cranks rather than the wrench to both remove and install pedals is not lazy, but rather efficient. That's the way most shop mechanics do it.
...and btw rotating the cranks rather than the wrench to both remove and install pedals is not lazy, but rather efficient. That's the way most shop mechanics do it.
Last edited by cny-bikeman; 01-17-13 at 09:51 AM.
#4
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
And then car lugs went to a tapered interface which makes a much better connection, and we're stuck with the "good-enough" technology from 1900 or whatever.
#5
Curmudgeon
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nausea, New Hamster
Posts: 1,572
Bikes: (see https://wildavis.smugmug.com/Bikes) Bianchi Veloce (2005), Nishiki Cascade (1992), Schwinn Super Sport (1983)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Something about the Wright Bros. (yes, those Wright Bros.) deciding to make it a standard when they built bikes back in the early part of the last Century. (Sheldon Brown has something about it on his site, and I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to find it!) Good luck!
- Wil
- Wil
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
If a the left pedal was loose, precession would cause the left pedal to unscrew if it had right handed threads. Precession is the reason for left hand threads on the left pedal.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
I'm highly dubious about any precession forces managing to loosen a pedal, but meh...
What I'd like to see is a tapered seat, to prevent the spindles eating into the crank and resulting crank failures.
What I'd like to see is a tapered seat, to prevent the spindles eating into the crank and resulting crank failures.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: England, currently dividing my time between university in Guildford and home just outside Reading
Posts: 1,921
Bikes: Too many to list here!
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
I've seen it. We had a BMX bike come into the co-op once that the owner had converted to left-hand drive by simply swapping the cranks over (obviously he had a left-hand drive rear wheel too). One pedal (I forget which) had worked itself loose. The shoulder on the pedal spindle was about a turn away from the crank face, and he hadn't ridden it very far. We tightened whichever one it was up, but while I wasn't there he apparently brought the bike back again with the same problem.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I've heard two explanations. The first is precession, which does occur and is also why English and Swiss bottom brackets have left hand threads on the drive side cup. The second sounds a bit more like an urban legand and is if the pedal bearings seize, the pedal will unscrew instead of breaking your ankle.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,488
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 163 Times
in
89 Posts
I've read that the left pedal often loosened up when in use, and that the Wright Bros., being the clever, innovative fellows that they were, came up with the idea of reverse threads on the left pedal. Simple as that......I wasn't there, so I can't swear this is the way it went down, but it sounds plausible to me.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: City of Brotherly Love
Posts: 1,562
Bikes: Raleigh Companion, Nashbar Touring, Novara DiVano, Trek FX 7.1, Giant Upland
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The precession forces are real. that's why I can't use the same hex key to revove padals that I installed them with. If you hang out with people that try to put together their own tandem drivetrains you'll see precession forces loosening pedals
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Anyone who's ever used an Italian BB knows that precession is a real thing.
#14
Really Old Senior Member
#15
Retro Grouch
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,210
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've heard two explanations. The first is precession, which does occur and is also why English and Swiss bottom brackets have left hand threads on the drive side cup. The second sounds a bit more like an urban legand and is if the pedal bearings seize, the pedal will unscrew instead of breaking your ankle.
Last edited by onespeedbiker; 01-17-13 at 12:55 PM.
#16
Mechanic/Tourist
The pedal axle is turning opposite to the BB spindle in relation to the balls, so of course the precession would occur on the opposite side.
#17
Retro Grouch
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,210
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Wow! I actually understand! I figured it had to have something with the orientation of the axle and bearings. Thanks!
Last edited by onespeedbiker; 01-17-13 at 02:36 PM.
#18
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,118
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
371 Posts
I'll give you another example of precession at work. The cone ring on a freewheel is left threaded to prevent it from unthreading while freewheeling. In normal use, the hub rotates clockwise within a stationary cog set while coasting in a forward direction. But what happens when a freewheel is re-purposed as a mid drive?
In this case, the hub is mounted stationary, and the outer body rotates clockwise about it. As I found out with this example, no amount of tightening would keep the ring from unscrewing. In the end, only loctite would keep the bearings from getting lost on the road.
In this case, the hub is mounted stationary, and the outer body rotates clockwise about it. As I found out with this example, no amount of tightening would keep the ring from unscrewing. In the end, only loctite would keep the bearings from getting lost on the road.
#19
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,245
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,433 Times
in
2,540 Posts
This question turns up a lot on BF. (I can say that with certainty, because that's what everyone told me when I asked it a while ago!) The answer is indeed precession. What made me understand was realizing that threads and grooves are not machined perfectly, they only touch in some places, there's tiny gaps in a lot of places, and depending on which direction sideways pressure is applied, the metal flexes a tiny bit and the contact points and gaps shift around. Voila -- precession! This is what drives your pedals into your cranks and leaves an imprint, and what tightens your drive-side bottom-bracket cup so that herculean efforts (giant cheater bars, the "Sheldon Brown Tool", boiling water, etc) are needed to loosen it. If the threading was opposite, then the riding your bike would cause these parts to loosen, not tighten.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
The term precession describes a motion, not a force. Gyroscopic precession, for example, is the resultant motion of the axis of a rotating body subject to a torque perpendicular to that axis.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Ah, I get it now - every time I looked it up in the past, I found myself looking at the general article on Wiki, which was mystifying. This time, I spotted Precession (mechanical) under See Also.
I'd always assumed it was some obscure force coming off the bearing balls, but it's simply the load moving around the axis. The article quotes our own Mr Brandt:
It's clear as day now.
Pedal washers might prevent wear at the crank/pedal interface, but IMO they're just likely to spread half the damage over a slightly larger area. Speaking of Jobst Brandt, he came up with a much better solution: https://www.pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-016.html
Seems to me, this evolution is a no-brainer and quite feasible to introduce; mobs making pedals should start doing them with a taper and providing inverse cone-shaped washers for normal cranks, and making a tool to create the chamfer in the crank available to shops. The collets could be made available in order to fit square-shouldered pedals to modified or new cranks. A relatively painless thing, as far as transitions in standards go IMO.
I just scored some sweet hollow Dura-Ace cranks, and the last thing I want to see is them die due to a stupid old standard like this...
I'd always assumed it was some obscure force coming off the bearing balls, but it's simply the load moving around the axis. The article quotes our own Mr Brandt:
"For a pedal, a rotating load arises from downward pedaling force on a spindle rotating with its crank making the predominantly downward force effectively rotate about the pedal spindle. What may be less evident is that even tightly fitting parts have relative clearance due to their elasticity, metals not being rigid materials as is evident from steel springs. Under load, micro deformations, enough to cause motion, occur in such joints. This can be seen from wear marks where pedal spindles seat on crank faces."
Bicycle pedals are left-threaded on the left-hand crank so that precession tightens the pedal rather than loosening it. This may seem counter-intuitive, but the torque exerted due to the precession is several orders of magnitude greater than that caused by a jammed pedal bearing.
Bicycle pedals are left-threaded on the left-hand crank so that precession tightens the pedal rather than loosening it. This may seem counter-intuitive, but the torque exerted due to the precession is several orders of magnitude greater than that caused by a jammed pedal bearing.
Pedal washers might prevent wear at the crank/pedal interface, but IMO they're just likely to spread half the damage over a slightly larger area. Speaking of Jobst Brandt, he came up with a much better solution: https://www.pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-016.html
Seems to me, this evolution is a no-brainer and quite feasible to introduce; mobs making pedals should start doing them with a taper and providing inverse cone-shaped washers for normal cranks, and making a tool to create the chamfer in the crank available to shops. The collets could be made available in order to fit square-shouldered pedals to modified or new cranks. A relatively painless thing, as far as transitions in standards go IMO.
I just scored some sweet hollow Dura-Ace cranks, and the last thing I want to see is them die due to a stupid old standard like this...
Last edited by Kimmo; 01-17-13 at 05:41 PM.
#22
Road Runner
Thread Starter
Great explanation -- I totally understand now. The "tight pedal bearing" explanation also didn't right true since it would take a completely frozen bearing and a lot of force to break loose a pedal that was halfway properly tightened. The mechanical precession due to the axial load on the threads explains all (and also why pedals are so hard to remove even when you swore you didn't install them that tightly).
#23
Old Fart In Training
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
Lots to know, so much on this subject.
I've never had a pedal come loose,
All I do Is tighten them down by hand and an open end wrench to a good snug feel and
an unknown torque,,,
That should be all the average riders needs to know right ?
I've never had a pedal come loose,
All I do Is tighten them down by hand and an open end wrench to a good snug feel and
an unknown torque,,,
That should be all the average riders needs to know right ?
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Guadalajara, México.
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh wow; I was about to start a cult for the unknown supernatural force that tightens pedal to infinity. Shouldn't have quit the dayjob! ._.
#25
Senior Member
When in doubt ask The Man. https://draco.nac.uci.edu/rbfaq/FAQ/8i.9.html