Is your top tube level?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Northwoods, Wisconsin
Posts: 702
Bikes: Holland Exogrid & Holland HC
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Is your top tube level?
For the 50 and especially 60+ riders, if you ride a bike with a level top tube, do you have any physical issues that would cause you to switch to a sloping tube?
I have a Merckx with a level top tube and I find it fine right now. The bike is a little big for me, but there is about a 1.5" drop from saddle to bars. I am going to have a new bike built and aesthetically, I prefer a level top tube. At least one builder I have talked to suggested a sloping top tube because of a lower step over height and some other reasons.
While I can see some comfort issues with the sloping top tube, if I am going to have a bike built, I would really prefer the level top tube. Any reason why I should consider a sloping top tube, or should I just go with my aesthetic preference?
(on a good day I can touch my fingers to the floor without bending my knees)
I have a Merckx with a level top tube and I find it fine right now. The bike is a little big for me, but there is about a 1.5" drop from saddle to bars. I am going to have a new bike built and aesthetically, I prefer a level top tube. At least one builder I have talked to suggested a sloping top tube because of a lower step over height and some other reasons.
While I can see some comfort issues with the sloping top tube, if I am going to have a bike built, I would really prefer the level top tube. Any reason why I should consider a sloping top tube, or should I just go with my aesthetic preference?
(on a good day I can touch my fingers to the floor without bending my knees)
#2
Senior Member
Both of my custom bikes have slightly sloping top tubes. I think my newest one has a 6 degree slope.
- The disadvantage of a sloping top tube is aesthetics (for those who like level top tubes)
- The advantage is allowing less saddle-to-handlebar drop without making other wacky changes in the geometry.
I think "lower step over height" is a poor reason to create a bike w/a sloping top tube. Unless you're going with a *dramatic* angle in the top tube, I don't see how it would make that much difference when you're getting off the bike.
One of the other changes that a builder can do is to make the headtube extension above the top tube slightly longer than "normal." That allows you to get the handlebars higher in relation to the saddle without having a huge stack of spacers.
In the end, though, you should get the bike that makes you excited
- The disadvantage of a sloping top tube is aesthetics (for those who like level top tubes)
- The advantage is allowing less saddle-to-handlebar drop without making other wacky changes in the geometry.
I think "lower step over height" is a poor reason to create a bike w/a sloping top tube. Unless you're going with a *dramatic* angle in the top tube, I don't see how it would make that much difference when you're getting off the bike.
One of the other changes that a builder can do is to make the headtube extension above the top tube slightly longer than "normal." That allows you to get the handlebars higher in relation to the saddle without having a huge stack of spacers.
In the end, though, you should get the bike that makes you excited
#3
Cycle Year Round
Kids these days are too lazy to lift their leg high enough to get it over the top tube. So they think, "no way that old dude can do it".
I would get the level top tube, it is what you want and you will have buyers remorse if you do not get it.
I would get the level top tube, it is what you want and you will have buyers remorse if you do not get it.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589
Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I for one, hate a sloping top tube.
#5
Starting over
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
"Step over height" means absolutely zip to me in terms of mounting - I always swing my leg over the back of the bike (and the saddle) rather than over the top tube. That saddle height will be the same distance from the ground, regardless of whether the top tube slopes or not.
"Stand over height" is a different animal to me, and IMO implies the distance between your crotch and the bike when you come to a stop and get off the saddle, but stay astride the bike.
The only reason I'm planning to get a sloping top tube bike is that all of the "relaxed" road bikes I've seen on the market (those with a shorter reach and longer head tube) seem to be designed that way. If I was ordering a custom bike I'd probably rely on the advice of the designer.
"Stand over height" is a different animal to me, and IMO implies the distance between your crotch and the bike when you come to a stop and get off the saddle, but stay astride the bike.
The only reason I'm planning to get a sloping top tube bike is that all of the "relaxed" road bikes I've seen on the market (those with a shorter reach and longer head tube) seem to be designed that way. If I was ordering a custom bike I'd probably rely on the advice of the designer.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,868
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
4 Posts
One of my bikes is a Surly Long Haul Trucker. It has a very mildly sloping top tube which is not even noticeable. I think the drop is something like 1/4 ~ inch. I can live with that. Matter of fact, I like the look of the bike the way I have it set up. All my other road bikes have flat top tubes.
#8
www.ocrebels.com
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 6,186
Bikes: Several bikes, Road, Mountain, Commute, etc.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
2 Posts
Out of 7 bikes, 5 have level top tubes, 2 have sloping top tubes. Of those that have sloping top tubes, one is a hard-tail mountain bike (GT Zaskar), and the other is my go-fast climbing bike (GURU Photon).
To me, the truth is, it really doesn't matter whether the top tube is level or not.
Rick / OCRR
To me, the truth is, it really doesn't matter whether the top tube is level or not.
Rick / OCRR
#10
Banned.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
70+ here and still easily mount and ride my level 1999 Lemoind BA. As I swing my leg over the seat, I see no relevance in whether or not the TT is level or sloped. How do you get on your bike? Am I missing something here? Why would age make a difference?
#11
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,588
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,275 Times
in
705 Posts
I hate the way sloping top tubes look.
So I asked the builder if he could do this with a level top tube instead. He said "Sure, but..." and proceeded to rattle off at least four good reasons why I would be better off with a sloping toptube.
I'll be honest, I don't remember what those reasons were. (!) But the fact that he had compelling reasons for that design -- it's not like he only ever builds sloping toptubes, this was a specific consideration based on what he knew about me and what sort of bike I was looking for -- convinced me to put up with an aesthetic element I wouldn't have originally choosen.
And now that I have the bike, I wouldn't change a thing...because it is freakin' gorgeous!
#12
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,588
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,275 Times
in
705 Posts
I hate you!
I can barely touch my wife's toes when she's got her feet in my lap! My own? Not a chance. And yet one of my bikes has a level top tube, another has a just-barely-sloping top tube, and then the new one (see above) has a bona fide sloping top tube. Nothing about that design element seems impacted by my inflexibility; I'm no less comfortable on the level TT bike than the others. 'Tis a non-issue, methinks.
#13
Old & Getting Older Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,343
Bikes: Bicycle Transportation: 2022 Hyundai Kona Electric, 2019 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
5 Posts
Hi,
I like the aesthetic of a level top tube better than a sloping top tube but you can't find a race bike these days with a level top tube. And for race bikes, overall performance and fit > aesthetics.
I like the aesthetic of a level top tube better than a sloping top tube but you can't find a race bike these days with a level top tube. And for race bikes, overall performance and fit > aesthetics.
__________________
Thanks.
Cleave
"Real men still wear pink."
Visit my blog at https://cleavesblant.wordpress.com/
Lightning Velo Cycling Club: https://www.lightningvelo.org/
Learn about our Green Dream Home at https://www.lawville.org/
Thanks.
Cleave
"Real men still wear pink."
Visit my blog at https://cleavesblant.wordpress.com/
Lightning Velo Cycling Club: https://www.lightningvelo.org/
Learn about our Green Dream Home at https://www.lawville.org/
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
11 Posts
I can easily touch my toes/floor anytime while standing.
Yes, have slightly sloping top tube.
As I age a bit (78 now) it's a tad easier to mount/dismount.
Can hardly wait 'til I get older!
Rudy/zonatandem
Yes, have slightly sloping top tube.
As I age a bit (78 now) it's a tad easier to mount/dismount.
Can hardly wait 'til I get older!
Rudy/zonatandem
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Most of my bikes have level top tubes, but two of them have sloping ones. The tandem has a slight slope since it was built with a slightly shorter seat tube in the back - we actually don't need it that way, but it's a very common tandem design since most couples aren't the same height. And my folder has a sloping top tube (or no top tube at all depending on what you call the single tube joining the head and seat tubes). On one tour I did with the folder my friend commented that he was envious of how easily I was able to get on and off - a fully loaded touring bike makes it a little harder to swing a leg up and over the seat.
But I don't see much of a functional difference either way. If you prefer the traditional aesthetics of a level top tube then I'd suggest you stick with that.
But I don't see much of a functional difference either way. If you prefer the traditional aesthetics of a level top tube then I'd suggest you stick with that.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 439
Bikes: Kona Dew Drop, Specialized Expedition Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Both of my bikes have sloping tops. I don't mind the look, and I appreciate the big standover space on my typical ride, which will include climbing over curbs and easing my way over minor obstacles like rocks, ledges or fallen branches on the trail. Kona makes all of its bikes with sloping tops, IIRC, and claims the resulting geometry allows for a better balance of ride comfort and control. I don't know about that, but I don't think there are any functional drawbacks to the sloped design. No big deal, but it is a bit easier to live with.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
2 Posts
I ride with both. My Jamis Eclipse and 80s Specialize Sirrus, and Colnago Master XL have level top tubes. My Cannondale and Specialized S-Works Roubaix have sloping top tubes. And my Indy Fab CJ TI has a very very mildly sloping top tube (it's not discernible to most people who see it). Thing is when I'm on them I never even think about it.
I do, however, wonder why we call it a sloping top tube instead of a slanting top tube.
I do, however, wonder why we call it a sloping top tube instead of a slanting top tube.
__________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
Favorite rides in the stable: Indy Fab CJ Ti - Colnago MXL - S-Works Roubaix - Habanero Team Issue - Jamis Eclipse carbon/831
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
Favorite rides in the stable: Indy Fab CJ Ti - Colnago MXL - S-Works Roubaix - Habanero Team Issue - Jamis Eclipse carbon/831
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Illinois (near St. Louis)
Posts: 852
Bikes: Specialized Expedition Sport, Surly LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One thing to consider with a sloping TT- if you have a rack that supports the bike by the TT, and carry more than one bike on it, you may have interference problems that you didn't have before.
#20
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
I have two vintage Road bikes with a horizontal top-tube and two modern Road bikes with a sloping top-tube.
I find that the modern bikes fit better. I like a longer top-tube in proportion to the seat tube and need a virtual top-tube length of 59 to 60cm. I also like having a taller head-tube length. Most bikes with level top-tubes have short (for me) top-tubes in proportion to the rest of the bike.
I base my selection on fit, not appearance.
I find that the modern bikes fit better. I like a longer top-tube in proportion to the seat tube and need a virtual top-tube length of 59 to 60cm. I also like having a taller head-tube length. Most bikes with level top-tubes have short (for me) top-tubes in proportion to the rest of the bike.
I base my selection on fit, not appearance.
#21
No I'm Not a Pirate!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The middle of somewhere in Indiana
Posts: 696
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've found that with congenital problems with both knees and hips, that have resulted in severe arthritis, and the replacement of one hip after it had fused... Horizontal top tube frames no longer have the appeal that they once did for me. But, really looking back on it, I always thought that the "Standard" diamond frame bike was pretty boring aesthetically anyway.
I ride all types of frames now,(step through, diamond, semi-recumbent) but my favorite is by far my Mixte (so I have twin angeled top tubes)... Which got me interested in the old cross frame designs of the late 1900's through 1950's https://www.rijwiel.net/kruisf2e.htm I would love to have a Utility/Xtra cycle bike based on the old Locomothief Frame design.
But, I guess you all are just talking about "Road Bikes" which I'm really not interested in anyway overall (even though I used to own several).
I just have to laugh, because it happens in C&V forum as well... When ever anyone starts talking about angeled vs. Level top tubes, it turns into a virility comparison contest, or something. "Huuurumph I don't need a slanted top tube, I can still throw my leg over a level top tube Huurummph huuuurmmmph"... Like that has something to do with it.
I ride all types of frames now,(step through, diamond, semi-recumbent) but my favorite is by far my Mixte (so I have twin angeled top tubes)... Which got me interested in the old cross frame designs of the late 1900's through 1950's https://www.rijwiel.net/kruisf2e.htm I would love to have a Utility/Xtra cycle bike based on the old Locomothief Frame design.
But, I guess you all are just talking about "Road Bikes" which I'm really not interested in anyway overall (even though I used to own several).
I just have to laugh, because it happens in C&V forum as well... When ever anyone starts talking about angeled vs. Level top tubes, it turns into a virility comparison contest, or something. "Huuurumph I don't need a slanted top tube, I can still throw my leg over a level top tube Huurummph huuuurmmmph"... Like that has something to do with it.
Last edited by Bionicycle; 02-08-11 at 08:43 AM. Reason: added thought
#22
Life is good
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not far from the Withlacoochee Trail. 🚴🏻
Posts: 18,209
Bikes: 2018 Lynskey Helix Pro
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Is your top tube level?
I'm 66 and have no problems with any of the bikes. Level top tubes work if the bike is sized correctly.
__________________
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8
I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8
I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
Last edited by RonH; 02-08-11 at 08:26 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't think there's any advantage to a level top tube, except its aesthetic quality. To some people that's just the way a bike should look. I thought the sloping tubes looked weird and, well, "wrong" when they first appeared, but I've gotten used to them. Now a level top tube looks kind of "retro". I choose bikes for how they work, not so much how they look. I do like a sharp looking bike, but a level top tube is no longer part of that equation.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mine is pretty level and tall on my cyclocross frame. I had to lean the bike way over to get on. Then I noticed some months ago (I'm 71) I had to chase my foot around the bedroom to put a sock on. So I started doing quad and hamstring stretches. Once a day, one rep for 30 seconds. That's per a pt expert who's books I read. Now I can just swing the foot over.
It's all in how one accommodates the aging thing. I prefer to keep as much functionality as possible rather than change the equipment until there's no other option.
Al
It's all in how one accommodates the aging thing. I prefer to keep as much functionality as possible rather than change the equipment until there's no other option.
Al
#25
Legs; OK! Lungs; not!
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 2,096
Bikes: ''09 Motobecane Immortal Pro (Yellow), '02 Diamondback Hybrid, '09 Lamborghini Viaggio, ''11 Cervelo P2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
4 Posts
I'm not sure I can really grasp what difference the placement of the top tube really makes besides 1. stand over hight, and 2. aesthetics. To my way of thinking the only important factors are the relationship of the 3 points you body contacts the bike: the seat, the pedals, and the handle bars. How the tubes are connected to one another are irrelevant so long as those 3 points in space are at the same place in relationship to one another.
I realize that aesthetics, safety, bike handling, sanctioning rules, weight, and many other design factors will tend to dictate how those tubes come together, but I imagine you could build a very comfortable "bike" that would look very different from what we consider a "bike" and have it be as comfortable and efficient as a traditional "Flat bar."
Having said that, let's not venture into a discussion of "bents." That is an entirely different story as the relationship of those 3 points is totally different on those bikes.
I realize that aesthetics, safety, bike handling, sanctioning rules, weight, and many other design factors will tend to dictate how those tubes come together, but I imagine you could build a very comfortable "bike" that would look very different from what we consider a "bike" and have it be as comfortable and efficient as a traditional "Flat bar."
Having said that, let's not venture into a discussion of "bents." That is an entirely different story as the relationship of those 3 points is totally different on those bikes.