Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Centurion Pro Tour 15 FD Problem

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Centurion Pro Tour 15 FD Problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-19, 08:24 PM
  #1  
Sophylong
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Centurion Pro Tour 15 FD Problem

Hello all,

Getting back into cycling after many years away and I have forgotten almost everything I used to know! 10 years ago I had all the basic bicycle tools and basic know how, but at that time due to various life events I sold all the bikes and have seem to have forgotten how to trouble shoot.

Recently got back into riding for exercise and picked up a Centurion Pro Tour 15 for $40. It had a mix matched group set on it and so I went about mix matching it even more!

The biggest problem is the crank and FD. I had a compact FSA BB30 sitting around collecting dust which obviously wouldn't mount and also had a single speed I put together about 5 years ago that I held on to. The Centurion came with a square taper triple. I removed the triple and mounted the Sugino AT cranks on to the bike and the FSA had the same BCD so the rings went on too. The original FD is a clamp on and the only FD I had laying around was a 105 braze on so i left the original FD on.

The L limit screw adjusted outboard enough to engage the smaller ring but im having difficulty getting into the big ring. It went in 1 in 20 times or so during my test ride. H limit is maxed out. Im thinking the FD is a little high, but im not sure because I believe the original triple was also a 50 tooth. It looks like if the crank arm was about 2mm closer to the frame of the bike that would work too, but I feel like I shouldnt tighten it any further. Could it be a spindle length issue?

Everything else is working well. I had a full 105 10spd set, minus chain, sitting in a box in the garage so that all bolted on and has been adjusted. Funds are still tight so I'm hesitant to bring it into the LBS. Is there any hope for me!? Ive lost 17 pounds these past few months so I thought I deserved the $40 upgrade bike, but its turning into a bit of a nightmare.

I'd love to post a picture but apparently my post count is too low. I can email it to someone if they'd be able to post it for me.

V/R
Sophy
Sophylong is offline  
Old 10-14-19, 08:53 PM
  #2  
Sir_Name 
Senior Member
 
Sir_Name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,448

Bikes: are fun!

Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 466 Post(s)
Liked 862 Times in 272 Posts
Well, a Pro Tour 15 for $40 is quite the steal...that’s a great bike.

Just to be clear, what parts were taken off and what parts replaced them? Sounds as though the Sugino AT stayed in place with new rings and same spindle? What were the tooth counts before and after, 50t for old and new? The front derailleur cage outer plate should float a couple mm above the big chainring. Front derailleur low limit keeps the chain from dropping from the small chainring towards the frame, high front derailleur limit keeps the chain from dropping from the big chainring towards the pedals. Need to take chainline to the freewheel at both extremes into account.

Was the bike stock when you got it? Check the chain length per Sheldon Brown. Pics would really help. Keep posting!

Last edited by Sir_Name; 10-14-19 at 09:10 PM.
Sir_Name is offline  
Old 10-14-19, 09:06 PM
  #3  
Sophylong
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Sir_Name
Well, a Pro Tour 15 for $40 is quite the steal...that’s a great bike.

Just to be clear, what parts were taken off and what parts replaced them? Sounds as though the Sugino AT stayed in place with new rings and same spindle? The front derailleur cage should float a couple mm above the big chainring. Was the bike stock when you got it? Check the chain length per Sheldon Brown. Pics would really help. Keep posting!
I thought $40 was a good deal too, which is why i jumped on it The Sugino cranks actually came off the single speed I referenced earlier. I do not believe the Centurion was stock. The parts replaced/removed we're:

-brake levers (replaced with 105 10spd Brifters)
-triple crank, replaced with Sugino ATs and FSA compact rings
-DT shifters removed and replaced with stops
-DP25 wheels(29ers?) replaced with Shimano RS
-quil stem replaced with 1 1/8 adapter and stem
-new handle bar
- toe clips/pedals with old DA clipless
- suntour? RD replaced with 105

Chain length seems good. I set the chain big to big and added two lengths. Has enough length and the space between the RD pulley chain section and chain stay chain section seem to have enough gap.

Thanks for looking!

Edit: regarding low limit, I understanda i adjusted the limit so it wouldn't fall towards the frame. The high I maxed out hoping to get a couple more millimeters towards the big chain side. Spindle and BB were left original.

Last edited by Sophylong; 10-14-19 at 09:10 PM.
Sophylong is offline  
Old 10-14-19, 09:10 PM
  #4  
CO_Hoya 
Señor Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 894
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 294 Times in 148 Posts
Pic assist

CO_Hoya is offline  
Old 10-14-19, 09:17 PM
  #5  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3804 Post(s)
Liked 6,643 Times in 2,602 Posts
Sounds like your BB spindle is too long on the drive side as you suspect. One cheap fix is to reverse that spindle, i.e., try what’s now on the non-drive side on the drive side.
nlerner is online now  
Old 10-14-19, 09:20 PM
  #6  
Sophylong
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by nlerner
Sounds like your BB spindle is too long on the drive side as you suspect. One cheap fix is to reverse that spindle, i.e., try what’s now on the non-drive side on the drive side.
I didn't even think of that! I guess I'll be watching YouTube videos tonight lol. May have to get some more tools, all I was able to find in my old boxes were a pedal wrench and crank puller
Sophylong is offline  
Old 10-14-19, 10:05 PM
  #7  
Jeff Wills
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
 
Jeff Wills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,826
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 797 Post(s)
Liked 695 Times in 372 Posts
I'd like to see a picture of the crank looking down from the top. I bet there's lots of clearance between the inner chainring and the chainstay, which would mean your bottom bracket spindle is too long. IMO it's easiest to experiment with different length spindles by trying different cartridge bottom brackets. Cup & cone BB's are OK, but they're a hassle to experiment with.
__________________
Jeff Wills

Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills is offline  
Old 10-15-19, 07:22 AM
  #8  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Agree with others about the spindle length.
Was there something wrong with the triple? Why not just use that?
due ruote is offline  
Old 10-15-19, 07:40 AM
  #9  
Mr. 66
Senior Member
 
Mr. 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,283
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1135 Post(s)
Liked 1,727 Times in 951 Posts
That's a real beaut you have, great changes. I do agree with the others about the spindle check that over, it does look that the FD may be a tad high.
Mr. 66 is offline  
Old 10-15-19, 07:45 AM
  #10  
ollo_ollo
Senior Member
 
ollo_ollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Soviet of Oregon or Pensacola FL
Posts: 5,342

Bikes: Still have a few left!

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 466 Post(s)
Liked 529 Times in 267 Posts
Does your triple takeoff say "Aerox" on the arm? That's what was on my old Pro Tour. A top end SR crankset. Don
ollo_ollo is offline  
Old 10-15-19, 08:13 AM
  #11  
Sophylong
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by due ruote
Agree with others about the spindle length.
Was there something wrong with the triple? Why not just use that?
NBothing wrong with the triple that I know of. It was one of those cases where I got "itchy hands" and couldn't leave well enough alone. Had spares parts sitting around and thought I'd make use of them.

Originally Posted by Mr. 66
That's a real beaut you have, great changes. I do agree with the others about the spindle check that over, it does look that the FD may be a tad high.
Thanks, I think it's coming along fairly well too. I will have to try adjusting the FD first when I get home.

Originally Posted by Jeff Wills
I'd like to see a picture of the crank looking down from the top. I bet there's lots of clearance between the inner chainring and the chainstay, which would mean your bottom bracket spindle is too long. IMO it's easiest to experiment with different length spindles by trying different cartridge bottom brackets. Cup & cone BB's are OK, but they're a hassle to experiment with.
Currently at work, but I agree. From what I recall the spindle does seem to have quite a bit of space between the frame and crank arms. I'm hoping that the spindle is asymmetric and want to try flipping it first. Just need a little bit of time and see if I can get my hands on some additional tools.

Originally Posted by ollo_ollo
Does your triple takeoff say "Aerox" on the arm? That's what was on my old Pro Tour. A top end SR crankset. Don
Oh that's good to know! I do believe it is marked AEROX, but won't be sure until I get home later this evening. To be honest, I just like the look of the compact more which is why I attempted the swap in the first place.
Sophylong is offline  
Old 10-15-19, 08:29 AM
  #12  
seypat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times in 1,510 Posts
You could get compact rings for the triple crank and run it as a compact double.
seypat is offline  
Old 10-15-19, 08:51 AM
  #13  
ollo_ollo
Senior Member
 
ollo_ollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Soviet of Oregon or Pensacola FL
Posts: 5,342

Bikes: Still have a few left!

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 466 Post(s)
Liked 529 Times in 267 Posts
Can't say for sure, because my Pro Tour was high mileage when I got it, but said to have all original equipment. It had SunTour VGT (Luxe?) derailleurs. With a new wheel set, it gave good service as my main Winter rain bike for about 10 years. Sold it to someone in Bellingham, WA. Don
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
DSC01215.jpg (169.4 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg
DSC01516.jpg (941.5 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg
DSC01517.jpg (1.05 MB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg
DSC01518.jpg (878.2 KB, 58 views)

Last edited by ollo_ollo; 10-15-19 at 08:59 AM. Reason: add pic
ollo_ollo is offline  
Old 10-15-19, 11:06 AM
  #14  
davester
Senior Member
 
davester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,533

Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 929 Post(s)
Liked 1,289 Times in 486 Posts
Sounds like a good buy! Do be aware that jamming a 10-speed rear wheel in there requires that the frame be cold set to the correct width and, more importantly, the dropouts need to be realigned. Otherwise, the stress placed on the rear dropout by clamping down on the quick release can eventually crack either the braze between the dropout and chainstay, or the dropout itself. This has happened to me and a number of folks on the forum.
davester is offline  
Old 10-15-19, 12:14 PM
  #15  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,835

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Liked 2,813 Times in 1,536 Posts
Best solution is to get cartridge bottom bracket to match the crankset you are using, I don't recall many japanese BB be asymetrical.....that was more of a campy thing....but that is memory

other observations

makes sure you can run Big Big combo. if you can't you need to lengthen the chain safety issue if you do not (fwiw I have moved to big big chain sizing method)

if that is a 120 spacing you really should coldset to 130mm, less an issue if it is 126mm spaceing

seat should be close to level.....lower seat post if needed
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Old 10-16-19, 08:49 AM
  #16  
Sophylong
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sorry for the late replies, I am limited to 5 responses in 24 hours currently.


Originally Posted by davester
Sounds like a good buy! Do be aware that jamming a 10-speed rear wheel in there requires that the frame be cold set to the correct width and, more importantly, the dropouts need to be realigned. Otherwise, the stress placed on the rear dropout by clamping down on the quick release can eventually crack either the braze between the dropout and chainstay, or the dropout itself. This has happened to me and a number of folks on the forum.


Originally Posted by squirtdad
Best solution is to get cartridge bottom bracket to match the crankset you are using, I don't recall many japanese BB be asymetrical.....that was more of a campy thing....but that is memory


other observations


makes sure you can run Big Big combo. if you can't you need to lengthen the chain safety issue if you do not (fwiw I have moved to big big chain sizing method)


if that is a 120 spacing you really should coldset to 130mm, less an issue if it is 126mm spaceing


seat should be close to level.....lower seat post if needed


Thank you for the warnings. I'll make sure to check the dropouts and stays for stress or cracks. When I purchased the bike it actually came with an 8spd rear wheel, which I believe is spaced at 130. I haven't checked alignment yet, but I'll do some rudimentary work with some string and see how that goes. The 10spd rear actually dropped right in without having to part the drops so I want to assume the previous owner cold set it. The brakes were also set up already for 700c. Looking at some pictures online the previous owner definitely made some changes to the bike's stock form and from the saddle and other changes I assume it was used primarily for long distance riding or touring. I'll have to measure the drop outs and confirm spacing. To be clear, the chain length WAS set big-big through the FD.


Regarding the original problem, I am happy to announce that the issue no longer exists! After cleaning the roof yesterday evening I got around to mucking around with the bike and made a few changes. The FD was actually around 3mm too high so that was lowered to the appropriate height. I was not able to find torque settings online for the crank to BB but decided to give the crank arm bolt 2/3 a turn more tightening. It does not appear or feel over tightened but managed to bring the arm inboard enough that the shifting now works beautifully with no chain rub except in extreme cross chain events.


Regarding saddle height and angle. That picture was from my first test ride and in my haste to get going I just eyeballed the saddle height and angle. It has now been adjusted. It actually needed to be about 4mm higher and pushed back slightly. No knee pains, and the angle of my knee at full extension seem about right. Unfortunately I haven't been able to go for an extended ride so that may change a little in the future.


Thank you to everyone who took the time to reply to my post! I truly appreciate it. All that's left is to clean up cabling and shorten the housing in a few places and go for some more rides! I'll take a few more pictures and throw it into that long running "vintage with ergo bar" thread too.


On a side note, if anyone here bought an Eddy Merckx Tianium AX with full DA and carbon wheels 14 years ago on EBAY I hope you are still riding it and would love some pictures of my old bike.
Sophylong is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.