Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Altered my geometry.

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Altered my geometry.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-24, 09:27 PM
  #1  
VegasJen
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 941
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 300 Posts
Altered my geometry.

In honor of my biggest forum critic, I thought I would repost this here. Enjoy.

One of the things I've noticed on all my bikes, both conventional road and my tri bikes, is I always feel like I can't adjust the seat far enough forward. This has always bothered me because I feel like I'm pushing the pedals forward at the top of the stroke rather than pushing down. This, in turn, pushes me back on the seat. So I always feel like I'm pushing back, scooching forward, push back, scooch forward, back, forward, back forward. It has gotten very aggravating.

Now, I'm a nurse by profession but I have some engineering background thanks to my military service, and I have always just kind of had a solution oriented thought process.

So if I can't find what I want to fix my issue, I'll make it. Without going into all the details (which I can do if anybody is curious), I bought a cheap straight seat post and made a bracket that allows me to locate the seat as much as 2 inches farther forward than the forward most position I could get with even a "zero offset" seat post.

Here's the original configuration with an off-the-shelf zero offset seat post. I have a red line drawn through so you can see the most forward position I am able to adjust with this geometry.


This is the bracket I made in an attempt to test my theory.


And finally, the bracket as mounted with the seat. As you can tell, the seat is now around 2 inches (5cm) farther forward than the previous forward-most adjustment, and I still have another inch or more I could go if I really want.


When I first put it together, I had it moved all the way forward but that really wasn't comfortable. I moved it back to the position it's in now and that feels pretty good, although I've only ridden once with the new bracket. But that only attempt was a 30 mile route where my previous best was just under 1 hour, 48 minutes. Even on tired legs (5 mile run the day prior) I crushed that previous best by almost three minutes.

I still have some fine tuning to make. And I need to figure out how to secure my bottle cage holder better, but as of right now, I'm very happy with the way this has turned out.
VegasJen is offline  
Likes For VegasJen:
Old 01-19-24, 10:07 PM
  #2  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,098

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4211 Post(s)
Liked 3,881 Times in 2,316 Posts
I hope that you are dealing with the engine's flexibility too Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is online now  
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
Old 01-19-24, 11:43 PM
  #3  
VegasJen
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 941
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 300 Posts
I have only ridden the bike once since the new seat position as I have been working on fitting upgraded CF wheels to this frame (another thread about that). But the one ride I did, I was both more comfortable and faster than the previous set up.
VegasJen is offline  
Old 01-20-24, 03:19 AM
  #4  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
That’s very clever. Did you worry about the load on the (carbon?) seat tube being more off-axis than standard?
choddo is offline  
Old 01-20-24, 06:28 AM
  #5  
dsaul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,266
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 714 Post(s)
Liked 800 Times in 475 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
That’s very clever. Did you worry about the load on the (carbon?) seat tube being more off-axis than standard?
That certainly looks like an aluminum welded frame to me. I think it will be fine.
dsaul is offline  
Likes For dsaul:
Old 01-20-24, 06:59 AM
  #6  
Garthr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right where I'm supposed to be
Posts: 1,634

Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times in 127 Posts
Oh good job Jen ! I'm all for doing whatever works. I'm not entirely up to speed on that particular models geometry but it's obvious you'd be a candidate for a TT/Tri frame with a much steeper STA(typically 78d). Plus, shorter cranks and/or a mid-foot cleat position would definitely help you here as that is part of why you're wanting to be more forward in the first place, to place yourself in the optimal position over the BB to push down and back along the chainstays to the rear wheel. There's like a sweet spot, like an apex, where you're able to use every bit of the power you do have back to the rear wheel while your upper body is relatively relaxed. I can't help but picture the Roadrunner cartoons when the RR is at full speed from a side angle. The body is leaning forward while the trailing legs are in a blur of speed propelling the RR forward with ease. Zoom zoom zoom !


Last edited by Garthr; 01-20-24 at 07:20 AM.
Garthr is offline  
Likes For Garthr:
Old 01-20-24, 07:03 AM
  #7  
ScottCommutes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 571
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 366 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times in 175 Posts
Very cool. I just replaced my seat post due to clamp breakage. I generally try to get my seat as far back as possible because my frame is small.

I didn't try it, but is it possible to install a modern seat post with the clamp on top in a forward and also a backward direction to get more range of adjustment?

Also, a couple of positives for those old style seat posts. No clamp to break. And if the top of your seat tube is buggered, you can stick the seat post in upside down to help work things out until you can get it in the right way.
ScottCommutes is offline  
Old 01-20-24, 07:39 AM
  #8  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
Originally Posted by dsaul
That certainly looks like an aluminum welded frame to me. I think it will be fine.
Ah yeah on second look, can see the weld on the top tube
choddo is offline  
Old 01-20-24, 08:24 AM
  #9  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,891
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6973 Post(s)
Liked 10,975 Times in 4,695 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasJen
In honor of my biggest forum critic, I thought I would repost this here. Enjoy.

One of the things I've noticed on all my bikes, both conventional road and my tri bikes, is I always feel like I can't adjust the seat far enough forward.
Another solution would be buying a bike that fits properly. Any decent shop can help you with that.
Koyote is offline  
Likes For Koyote:
Old 01-20-24, 09:32 AM
  #10  
shelbyfv
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,557
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3680 Post(s)
Liked 5,444 Times in 2,767 Posts
Great minds....

shelbyfv is online now  
Likes For shelbyfv:
Old 01-20-24, 12:05 PM
  #11  
SoSmellyAir
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,667

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 1,475 Times in 1,022 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasJen
One of the things I've noticed on all my bikes, both conventional road and my tri bikes, is I always feel like I can't adjust the seat far enough forward. This has always bothered me because I feel like I'm pushing the pedals forward at the top of the stroke rather than pushing down. This, in turn, pushes me back on the seat. So I always feel like I'm pushing back, scooching forward, push back, scooch forward, back, forward, back forward. It has gotten very aggravating.
The key question is, you cannot adjust the seat far enough forward for what? To reach the handlebar? If so, I am afraid Koyote is right, the frame is too big, or at least too long for you.

With a "conventional" road bike, generally with a Seat Tube Angle of about 74*, the saddle fore/aft position is set only with reference to the bottom bracket, to optimize one's pedaling and balance. It is not for compensating for the reach to the handlebar, which should be adjusted by stem length and/or angle.

At the very top of the pedal stroke, one does have to at least slightly push the pedal forward. It helps to do so if the saddle is set properly, and if you heel down a little. If you are sliding back excessively, may be the nose of your saddle is pointed too high? That certainly appears to be the case in the last photo you posted above.
SoSmellyAir is online now  
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
Old 01-20-24, 12:44 PM
  #12  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,800

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,026 Times in 723 Posts
Originally Posted by ScottCommutes
I didn't try it, but is it possible to install a modern seat post with the clamp on top in a forward and also a backward direction to get more range of adjustment?
Yes-ish, the seatpost is the determiner of what will work. When I trimmed a 24" road bike down to a 20" to fit my then 7yo I had to try 3 different posts to see which would allow the seat to sit flat or with the slightest tilt of the nose. As you can see in a pic someone posted above, its easy to do with a seat pillar and clamp. In my case I have/had a small drawer of 27.2 posts and didn't want to spend more money on a pillar and heavy steel clamp. Of the 3 only one worked. Profile also makes a pedal forward post that's designed to tilt forward, while thomson's setback post can also be turned forward for the same purpose. These last two wouldn't work for the OP as they both require a more post to be exposed then she has in her pic.
Russ Roth is offline  
Old 01-20-24, 01:35 PM
  #13  
wheelreason
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,820
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 505 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times in 377 Posts
You know you can just get a seatpost with a lot of setback and mount it facing aft, yes?....
wheelreason is offline  
Likes For wheelreason:
Old 01-20-24, 02:26 PM
  #14  
SoSmellyAir
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,667

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 1,475 Times in 1,022 Posts
Originally Posted by Russ Roth
... When I trimmed a 24" road bike down to a 20" to fit my then 7yo ...
Pray tell; don't leave us in suspense! Don't 24" and 20" refer to the size of the wheels and tires mounted to kids' bikes?

Originally Posted by wheelreason
You know you can just get a seatpost with a lot of setback and mount it facing aft, yes?....
I don't think that would work; the angle between the setback portion and the main shaft would be all wrong.
SoSmellyAir is online now  
Old 01-20-24, 03:55 PM
  #15  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,800

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,026 Times in 723 Posts
Originally Posted by SoSmellyAir
Pray tell; don't leave us in suspense! Don't 24" and 20" refer to the size of the wheels and tires mounted to kids' bikes?
.
Correct. This meant changing wheels from a 540 (24") ertro to a 451(20"), cutting crank arms to 115mm and drilling and tapping them, changing the handlebars from 38 to 34, turning the seatpost to accommodate reach. Effectively trimming a 24" to 20"
Russ Roth is offline  
Old 01-20-24, 04:13 PM
  #16  
rosefarts
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,596
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 864 Times in 491 Posts
In my Tri days, late 90’s to early aughts, it was pretty common for people to use a setback seatpost and just put it on backwards.

The Thomson setback was the most common one for that. They achieved basically the same thing you’ve done.

A proper Tri bike should put you far enough forward that you don’t need to do this. Since you’re needing to do this mod, I suspect one of the following things.
- it’s an aero road bike but has road bike geometry, not triathlon geo.
-it’s too big for you
-your aerobars are too far forward

I don’t know which one it is.

If this is working, I say lean into it and ride. Consider a proper setback post in reverse for a decent fit in the future if this works.
rosefarts is online now  
Old 01-20-24, 04:24 PM
  #17  
SoSmellyAir
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,667

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 1,475 Times in 1,022 Posts
Originally Posted by Russ Roth
Correct. This meant changing wheels from a 540 (24") ertro to a 451(20"), cutting crank arms to 115mm and drilling and tapping them, changing the handlebars from 38 to 34, turning the seatpost to accommodate reach. Effectively trimming a 24" to 20"
Phew. I thought you had cut the frame. Turns out you only made a donk.
SoSmellyAir is online now  
Old 01-20-24, 07:40 PM
  #18  
wheelreason
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,820
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 505 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times in 377 Posts
Originally Posted by SoSmellyAir
I don't think that would work; the angle between the setback portion and the main shaft would be all wrong.
Have you ever seen a bike with a saddle pointed up or down?...
wheelreason is offline  
Old 01-20-24, 11:26 PM
  #19  
grumpus
Senior Member
 
grumpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,242
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 436 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by ScottCommutes
I didn't try it, but is it possible to install a modern seat post with the clamp on top in a forward and also a backward direction to get more range of adjustment?
Depends on the seatpost - some (most?) don't have sufficient range of movement to get the saddle flat.
Originally Posted by ScottCommutes
Also, a couple of positives for those old style seat posts. No clamp to break.
But the saddle clamps used with them are typically hard to adjust, and don't hold adjustment for long anyway.
grumpus is offline  
Old 01-20-24, 11:41 PM
  #20  
VegasJen
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 941
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 300 Posts
Originally Posted by dsaul
That certainly looks like an aluminum welded frame to me. I think it will be fine.
This.
VegasJen is offline  
Likes For VegasJen:
Old 01-21-24, 12:02 AM
  #21  
VegasJen
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 941
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 300 Posts
Originally Posted by shelbyfv
Great minds....

This is what I've done on my road bikes.
Originally Posted by SoSmellyAir
The key question is, you cannot adjust the seat far enough forward for what? To reach the handlebar? If so, I am afraid Koyote is right, the frame is too big, or at least too long for you.

With a "conventional" road bike, generally with a Seat Tube Angle of about 74*, the saddle fore/aft position is set only with reference to the bottom bracket, to optimize one's pedaling and balance. It is not for compensating for the reach to the handlebar, which should be adjusted by stem length and/or angle.

At the very top of the pedal stroke, one does have to at least slightly push the pedal forward. It helps to do so if the saddle is set properly, and if you heel down a little. If you are sliding back excessively, may be the nose of your saddle is pointed too high? That certainly appears to be the case in the last photo you posted above.
The frame may be too big, but it's only a 51cm. About as short as I can find. I think someone makes a 49 but it's hard to find, unless ordering new, and mama ain't got the bucks for that.

As for the nose of the seat, yes, it is pointed up a bit. I find it more comfortable on longer rides as I'm able to support my weight on my pelvic bone rather than on "soft tissue".
Originally Posted by wheelreason
You know you can just get a seatpost with a lot of setback and mount it facing aft, yes?....
I almost purchased another post just to do that, but given I already had a zero offset post on it and I still didn't feel it was far enough forward, I thought this might be an interesting project.
Originally Posted by SoSmellyAir
Pray tell; don't leave us in suspense! Don't 24" and 20" refer to the size of the wheels and tires mounted to kids' bikes?



I don't think that would work; the angle between the setback portion and the main shaft would be all wrong.
Originally Posted by rosefarts
In my Tri days, late 90’s to early aughts, it was pretty common for people to use a setback seatpost and just put it on backwards.

The Thomson setback was the most common one for that. They achieved basically the same thing you’ve done.

A proper Tri bike should put you far enough forward that you don’t need to do this. Since you’re needing to do this mod, I suspect one of the following things.
- it’s an aero road bike but has road bike geometry, not triathlon geo.
-it’s too big for you
-your aerobars are too far forward

I don’t know which one it is.

If this is working, I say lean into it and ride. Consider a proper setback post in reverse for a decent fit in the future if this works.
I think the problem is this is just an older frame design and it has a bit more relaxed geometry than newer, more aggressive designs. It may be that Ridley just slapped aero bars and shifters on their road bike frame and called it good. I've seen newer road bikes that have more aggressive seat tube angles than this has. But yes, the frame is marginally too big for me. The reason I had to do this is because I have to drop the seat almost down to the clamp just to keep my feet on the pedals at the bottom of my stroke. I guess really I should be riding a bike with 650s just to get the right size frame but just dammit, I don't want to hassle with two different size wheels/tires between my bikes.

I had to move the aero bars forward to accommodate this new position. I had the bike set up pretty well before, aside from the scooch/slide thing. I actually think a lot of the problem is the crank arms are just too long. I should probably be on 160mm crank arms, maybe even shorter.
VegasJen is offline  
Old 01-21-24, 12:05 AM
  #22  
VegasJen
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 941
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 300 Posts
Originally Posted by Garthr
Oh good job Jen ! I'm all for doing whatever works. I'm not entirely up to speed on that particular models geometry but it's obvious you'd be a candidate for a TT/Tri frame with a much steeper STA(typically 78d). Plus, shorter cranks and/or a mid-foot cleat position would definitely help you here as that is part of why you're wanting to be more forward in the first place, to place yourself in the optimal position over the BB to push down and back along the chainstays to the rear wheel. There's like a sweet spot, like an apex, where you're able to use every bit of the power you do have back to the rear wheel while your upper body is relatively relaxed. I can't help but picture the Roadrunner cartoons when the RR is at full speed from a side angle. The body is leaning forward while the trailing legs are in a blur of speed propelling the RR forward with ease. Zoom zoom zoom !

I definitely prefer a more forward position, and I absolutely think I would benefit from shorter crank arms. Seems every-freaking-thing out there comes with either 170 or 175, even smaller frame bikes. Very frustrating. And yes, I think I want my legs to be more directly under me. At least more under me than conventional frames allow.
VegasJen is offline  
Old 01-21-24, 01:36 PM
  #23  
wheelreason
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,820
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 505 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times in 377 Posts
Climbing, just saying...
wheelreason is offline  
Old 01-21-24, 02:52 PM
  #24  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times in 2,557 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasJen
...

When I first put it together, I had it moved all the way forward but that really wasn't comfortable. I moved it back to the position it's in now and that feels pretty good, although I've only ridden once with the new bracket. But that only attempt was a 30 mile route where my previous best was just under 1 hour, 48 minutes. Even on tired legs (5 mile run the day prior) I crushed that previous best by almost three minutes.

I still have some fine tuning to make. And I need to figure out how to secure my bottle cage holder better, but as of right now, I'm very happy with the way this has turned out.
+1! The huge clue that this works for you! I took 2 minutes off my 45 mile training loop with my brand new racing bike riding easy to not stress my knees with the 5mm crank length change. Times kept falling al the rest of that summer. I still ride nearly that setup almost 50 years later.

I suggest carrying the wrenches for the clamp and seat height, marking the current locations with tape and a protractor and making changes with one thing at a time, observing whether the change is better of worse. (Small changes; you are clearly close right now.)

And - keep an eye on that clamp. It's 1) a prototype and 2) machined aluminum. Seatposts break. Virtually always while you are riding. Ride enders or a perfect formula for turning a routine ride into an epic ride. (I've broken three. Two of those rides were epics. So far, lucky. No crashes.) Also keep an eye out for a post that can be flipped like shelbyfv's. Maybe an offset Thompson. That would be decently light and reliable. (A post that has been on a lot or winning bikes.)

Your solution is beautiful. Treasure it. It works and it was "the part" that got you to your "fit". But replace it before you break it, not after. It has already served you very well.
79pmooney is offline  
Old 01-21-24, 04:19 PM
  #25  
bboy314
Senior Member
 
bboy314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 1,018
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 334 Post(s)
Liked 748 Times in 389 Posts
If you want to replace this with something made for this purpose, look for a Profile Design Fast Forward post.
bboy314 is offline  
Likes For bboy314:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.