NYPD Slaps Cyclist With The Biggest Red Light Ticket We've Seen Read more: http://ww
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 57
Bikes: Canondale CAAD10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
NYPD Slaps Cyclist With The Biggest Red Light Ticket We've Seen
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Cyclist was in the wrong, but so was the cop for not stopping dude after the first offense.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Why is that? I was ticketed twice on one trip at the same photo radar for speeding. They weren't progressively larger tickets, but the fact that I broke the law two times earned me two tickets. Cyclists would think twice about breaking laws if they knew that they were being monitored. If I rob 10 stores in a row on a single day & the police simply monitor my behavior and the nab me in the end I'm guilty of all 10 robberies.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550
Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
145 Posts
Great revenue maker.
#5
Senior Member
Here in Illinoisy, outside of Chicago (where all lights are on timers, evidently), the State has recognised that bicyclists and motocyclists are incapable of registering on the magnetic sensors that will trigger a light change, so we have a 120 second "go if traffic is clear" law. Our State is stupid in many respects, but at least is helpful.
I think that story is along the lines of "giving him enough rope to hang himself." He had two extra chances to redeem himself and get off scott free. Also, how did he not know there was a police car behind him? He was NOT maintaining full situational awareness, there, but then, the headphones were a dead giveaway about that! If I were a police officer, I'd have let this guy wrack up the fines as well, on the theory that a whopping economic hardship will drive home a lesson that a lesser fine might not.
I think that story is along the lines of "giving him enough rope to hang himself." He had two extra chances to redeem himself and get off scott free. Also, how did he not know there was a police car behind him? He was NOT maintaining full situational awareness, there, but then, the headphones were a dead giveaway about that! If I were a police officer, I'd have let this guy wrack up the fines as well, on the theory that a whopping economic hardship will drive home a lesson that a lesser fine might not.
#6
abandoning
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i don't think the question was if he was breaking the law. i think the question is whether it is ethical for a cop to allow someone to break the law several times (a law btw that is intended to keep the offender and pedestrians safe) before pulling them over, apparently for the purpose of ratcheting up the fines.
perhaps the cop was hindered by one of the red lights or traffic, hence why it took several violations before he caught the cyclist. that would certainly be reasonable to me. letting violations happen in front of you without stopping the violations is not chill simply as a matter of policy.
perhaps the cop was hindered by one of the red lights or traffic, hence why it took several violations before he caught the cyclist. that would certainly be reasonable to me. letting violations happen in front of you without stopping the violations is not chill simply as a matter of policy.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
But it is one of the aspects of photo radar that can have an identical impact on motorists. Using the logic presented in this thread, a motorist who runs 3 red lights and is caught on all 3 by photo radar should only be fined once since he wasn't warned after the first offence. Once I became aware that I had no way of knowing I'd just been caught speeding & could be caught again & again on one trip, it slowed me down. There should be no requirement for any method of catching lawbreakers to warn these people that they are breaking the law so they can limit their fines & be more wary in the future. I don't believe for a minute that this cyclist was unaware that he was breaking the law. He ran all 3 lights knowing that it was illegal and should suffer the consequences.
#8
abandoning
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
But it is one of the aspects of photo radar that can have an identical impact on motorists. Using the logic presented in this thread, a motorist who runs 3 red lights and is caught on all 3 by photo radar should only be fined once since he wasn't warned after the first offence. Once I became aware that I had no way of knowing I'd just been caught speeding & could be caught again & again on one trip, it slowed me down. There should be no requirement for any method of catching lawbreakers to warn these people that they are breaking the law so they can limit their fines & be more wary in the future. I don't believe for a minute that this cyclist was unaware that he was breaking the law. He ran all 3 lights knowing that it was illegal and should suffer the consequences.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: West, Tn.
Posts: 1,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
1) Cyclist was in the wrong.
2) Sounds like NY Police have a chip on their shoulder about cyclists and that may be well-founded BUT to cite 3 instances 'just because' is out of line....unless the person is a repeat-offender and mouthy(imagine a New Yorker being that way).
My guess is the cyclist deserved it.
2) Sounds like NY Police have a chip on their shoulder about cyclists and that may be well-founded BUT to cite 3 instances 'just because' is out of line....unless the person is a repeat-offender and mouthy(imagine a New Yorker being that way).
My guess is the cyclist deserved it.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
i think you missed the point. there is a BIG difference between the radar and the officer - the photo radar cannot stop the next violation from happening. the officer can. i am not talking about this from only the cyclist's perspective - perhaps the opposite. imagine if you are legally walking across the street and get hit by the cyclist running the third red light. you require hospitalization, and the bill is pretty hefty. if you found out that the reason that the cop didn't stop him was because he was hoping to increase the cyclist's fines, wouldn't you be mad? using the robbery example from above, if you were the owner of the 2nd through 10th store that was robbed, wouldn't you be mad that the officer didn't arrest the guy after the first violation witnessed?
#11
Peloton Shelter Dog
Road cyclists are a menace, what with their deadly killer 20lb bicycles and all.
__________________
https://www.cotsiscad.com
https://www.cotsiscad.com
#12
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
#13
abandoning
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
yeah it does seem a bit strange that behavior apparently so inconsequential as to not require the officer to pull him over until there are three violations should necessitate a $1500 fine.
#15
Artificial Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 7,158
Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6768 Post(s)
Liked 5,479 Times
in
3,223 Posts
#16
Portland Fred
You're right, I'm approaching this from the perspective of the guy running 3 lights & deserving 3 tickets. I'm not that concerned that in this case, the cop let him repeatedly break the law. I'm guessing the cop figured given the current road conditions the likelihood of the cyclist causing an accident was low.
#17
Riding the bike I love.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,011
Bikes: Marinano Delta
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why is that? I was ticketed twice on one trip at the same photo radar for speeding. They weren't progressively larger tickets, but the fact that I broke the law two times earned me two tickets. Cyclists would think twice about breaking laws if they knew that they were being monitored. If I rob 10 stores in a row on a single day & the police simply monitor my behavior and the nab me in the end I'm guilty of all 10 robberies.
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 22
Bikes: 2008 Felt F3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
He broke the law (multiple times),got caught, and desrves the punishment.
I work in an area where the cyclists have taken over. The local laws are in favor of the bikes, and they have actually stated that they are trying to rid the city of automobiles! Cyclists here are rarely seen obeying any traffic or pedestrian laws. As a fellow cyclist, I am apalled an embarrased by their behavior. As a result, I refuse to ride anywhere near Portland, because I do not wish to be associated with these people. They give our sport/hobby a bad name. I am all for sharing the roads - and that means that I am courteous and safe when in a car, or on my bike.
I work in an area where the cyclists have taken over. The local laws are in favor of the bikes, and they have actually stated that they are trying to rid the city of automobiles! Cyclists here are rarely seen obeying any traffic or pedestrian laws. As a fellow cyclist, I am apalled an embarrased by their behavior. As a result, I refuse to ride anywhere near Portland, because I do not wish to be associated with these people. They give our sport/hobby a bad name. I am all for sharing the roads - and that means that I am courteous and safe when in a car, or on my bike.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 134
Bikes: 2012 CAAD10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The interesting question here is whether this is within the intent of the legislature's escalating penalty requirement. The fine is so high because of a requirement that re-offenders pay escalating fines, on the theory that the first fine clearly was not enough of a deterrent. So his initial fine was low -- $150 or so -- but by the third one it was $900 or something.
To me, that's the problem here. As I read it, the escalating penalty requirement was meant to apply only if you keep re-offending after getting caught -- if the original fine was not enough deterrent. What the legislature apparently meant to cover was the guy who just wouldn't learn his lesson -- who would get caught, pay the fine, shrug, and do it again. Here, the guy ran three red lights -- which, alright, is pretty brazen. But he never re-offended after getting the first fine -- he just got three tickets at once. So is it right that the escalating penalty applied in this situation, where you don't have a repeat offender?
Well, that's the other curious thing. Apparently judges consider this sort of ticket writing to be "double-dipping" -- technically they're separate crimes, but if a guy runs three red lights in a row a judge usually won't allow three tickets. So all this guy had to do was contest the tickets, and he'd be off with the fine that a person might normally get for running a single red light -- the court likely would not treat him like a three-time loser. But he didn't want to contest the tickets in part because he really and truly was guilty. So the facte that he gets worse treatment by rightfully owning up to it and admitting guilty just seems backwards.
To me, that's the problem here. As I read it, the escalating penalty requirement was meant to apply only if you keep re-offending after getting caught -- if the original fine was not enough deterrent. What the legislature apparently meant to cover was the guy who just wouldn't learn his lesson -- who would get caught, pay the fine, shrug, and do it again. Here, the guy ran three red lights -- which, alright, is pretty brazen. But he never re-offended after getting the first fine -- he just got three tickets at once. So is it right that the escalating penalty applied in this situation, where you don't have a repeat offender?
Well, that's the other curious thing. Apparently judges consider this sort of ticket writing to be "double-dipping" -- technically they're separate crimes, but if a guy runs three red lights in a row a judge usually won't allow three tickets. So all this guy had to do was contest the tickets, and he'd be off with the fine that a person might normally get for running a single red light -- the court likely would not treat him like a three-time loser. But he didn't want to contest the tickets in part because he really and truly was guilty. So the facte that he gets worse treatment by rightfully owning up to it and admitting guilty just seems backwards.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I don't know what the going rate for a lawyer in NYC is (maybe it was cheaper to just pay the whole $1550?) but the cyclist should have only had one ticket against him, not multiples at the same time. If he did something wrong (which we assume he did) then it was the cop's responsibility to stop him after the first one.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
To the guy who started that thread asking where he should go for a road bike vacation: not NYC.
#22
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Hell, do we even get drug users on a three strikes law if they have three "doses" in their possession?
I love my NY sports teams. The rest of the city... let's just say, not so much.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,247
Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Colnago C60, Santa Cruz Stigmata CC, and too many other bikes I don't ride
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
1) Cyclist was in the wrong.
2) Sounds like NY Police have a chip on their shoulder about cyclists and that may be well-founded BUT to cite 3 instances 'just because' is out of line....unless the person is a repeat-offender and mouthy(imagine a New Yorker being that way).
My guess is the cyclist deserved it.
2) Sounds like NY Police have a chip on their shoulder about cyclists and that may be well-founded BUT to cite 3 instances 'just because' is out of line....unless the person is a repeat-offender and mouthy(imagine a New Yorker being that way).
My guess is the cyclist deserved it.
#24
my nice bike is at home
I heard about the same thing happening in the late 80's to a messenger except it was 8 red lights and the guy got 8 tickets.
Don't know how it panned out in the end.
In NYC cars run them quite a bit actually, I see it everyday.
A reasonable Judge will reduce it to one ticket. The rider will also pay for the headphone thing which is actually pretty stupid, and he deserves to learn from.
Biking thru red lights though: Meh... They are optional, as long as its safe, if you stop at each one you might as well be driving car.
Don't know how it panned out in the end.
In NYC cars run them quite a bit actually, I see it everyday.
A reasonable Judge will reduce it to one ticket. The rider will also pay for the headphone thing which is actually pretty stupid, and he deserves to learn from.
Biking thru red lights though: Meh... They are optional, as long as its safe, if you stop at each one you might as well be driving car.
Last edited by kraftwerk; 10-12-12 at 08:17 PM.
#25
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 34
Bikes: Bianchi Imola, Canondale Quick 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I, as well as thousands upon thousands of New Yorkers run red lights everyday and in front of Police cars and officers.
The thing is, you have to be smart about it. You don't do it on the busy, heavily trafficked streets. But if you're in an everyday Brooklyn/Manhattan neighborhood and you come to a light, 9 times out of 10 people/police/etc. won't even look at you wrong.
I bet this guy was on Broadway or something like that.
The thing is, you have to be smart about it. You don't do it on the busy, heavily trafficked streets. But if you're in an everyday Brooklyn/Manhattan neighborhood and you come to a light, 9 times out of 10 people/police/etc. won't even look at you wrong.
I bet this guy was on Broadway or something like that.
Last edited by roker; 10-13-12 at 08:25 AM.