Bikes vs cars
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bikes vs cars
I got the latest issue of Outside Magazine yesterday in the mail and there was an interesting article highlighting an attorney that specializes in bicycle related cases. It was a very long article but much of it can be read online:
Megan Hottman, Bike-Car War Mitigator | City Biking | OutsideOnline.com
Megan Hottman, Bike-Car War Mitigator | City Biking | OutsideOnline.com
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Moved from Commuting to Advocacy & Safety.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,143
Bikes: Fully customized 11-spd MTB built on 2014 Santa Cruz 5010 frame; Brompton S2E-X 2014; Brompton M3E 2014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From the article:
"Often as not, they have been wronged, but Hottman consistently quotes a statistic that many riders don’t know or choose to ignore: roughly 47 percent of all bike-car mishaps happen because riders are at fault. That figure is debatable—there’s no national database, and Hottman’s use of it derives from small-sample studies, media accounts, and her own experience working on cases over the years. Still, there’s no doubt that riders often behave recklessly on roads and highways. Ask any driver who’s seen them blow through red lights or come screaming the wrong direction down one-way streets."
This, from a pro-cyclist lawyer, who's simply being a realist. I wonder how many people here would agree with this.
I do believe the 47% rider-is-wrong figure may not be far off the mark.
"Often as not, they have been wronged, but Hottman consistently quotes a statistic that many riders don’t know or choose to ignore: roughly 47 percent of all bike-car mishaps happen because riders are at fault. That figure is debatable—there’s no national database, and Hottman’s use of it derives from small-sample studies, media accounts, and her own experience working on cases over the years. Still, there’s no doubt that riders often behave recklessly on roads and highways. Ask any driver who’s seen them blow through red lights or come screaming the wrong direction down one-way streets."
This, from a pro-cyclist lawyer, who's simply being a realist. I wonder how many people here would agree with this.
I do believe the 47% rider-is-wrong figure may not be far off the mark.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Given that bicyclists and motorists draw from the same pool within the human race, I'm not at all surprised that responsibility and irresponsibility are similarly distributed.
OTOH- those figures have been bandied around for decades, and various versions include children. A decent percentage of bicycle/car collisions involve children, and I'm curious whether the 47% number includes children or not.
OTOH- those figures have been bandied around for decades, and various versions include children. A decent percentage of bicycle/car collisions involve children, and I'm curious whether the 47% number includes children or not.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,143
Bikes: Fully customized 11-spd MTB built on 2014 Santa Cruz 5010 frame; Brompton S2E-X 2014; Brompton M3E 2014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Given that bicyclists and motorists draw from the same pool within the human race, I'm not at all surprised that responsibility and irresponsibility are similarly distributed.
OTOH- those figures have been bandied around for decades, and various versions include children. A decent percentage of bicycle/car collisions involve children, and I'm curious whether the 47% number includes children or not.
OTOH- those figures have been bandied around for decades, and various versions include children. A decent percentage of bicycle/car collisions involve children, and I'm curious whether the 47% number includes children or not.
#7
eMail Sold to Spammers
From the article:
"Often as not, they have been wronged, but Hottman consistently quotes a statistic that many riders don’t know or choose to ignore: roughly 47 percent of all bike-car mishaps happen because riders are at fault. That figure is debatable—there’s no national database, and Hottman’s use of it derives from small-sample studies, media accounts, and her own experience working on cases over the years. Still, there’s no doubt that riders often behave recklessly on roads and highways. Ask any driver who’s seen them blow through red lights or come screaming the wrong direction down one-way streets."
This, from a pro-cyclist lawyer, who's simply being a realist. I wonder how many people here would agree with this.
I do believe the 47% rider-is-wrong figure may not be far off the mark.
"Often as not, they have been wronged, but Hottman consistently quotes a statistic that many riders don’t know or choose to ignore: roughly 47 percent of all bike-car mishaps happen because riders are at fault. That figure is debatable—there’s no national database, and Hottman’s use of it derives from small-sample studies, media accounts, and her own experience working on cases over the years. Still, there’s no doubt that riders often behave recklessly on roads and highways. Ask any driver who’s seen them blow through red lights or come screaming the wrong direction down one-way streets."
This, from a pro-cyclist lawyer, who's simply being a realist. I wonder how many people here would agree with this.
I do believe the 47% rider-is-wrong figure may not be far off the mark.
Unfortunately, due to the nature of the vehicles, it is usually the cyclist that ends up with the worst injuries.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Nor I.
But this misses the point completely. Cars and trucks are extremely dangerous heavy machinery. Collisions between motorvehicles and people are frequently lethal. It is the *ETHICAL* duty of a driver to do everything possible to avoid hitting even the most clueless child, grandma, pedestrian, or cyclist.
(And while bikes are far, far less dangerous than motorvehicles it is also the ethical duty of cyclists to avoid collisions with other vulnerable road users.)
But this misses the point completely. Cars and trucks are extremely dangerous heavy machinery. Collisions between motorvehicles and people are frequently lethal. It is the *ETHICAL* duty of a driver to do everything possible to avoid hitting even the most clueless child, grandma, pedestrian, or cyclist.
(And while bikes are far, far less dangerous than motorvehicles it is also the ethical duty of cyclists to avoid collisions with other vulnerable road users.)
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
.....It is the *ETHICAL* duty of a driver to do everything possible to avoid hitting even the most clueless child, grandma, pedestrian, or cyclist.
(And while bikes are far, far less dangerous than motorvehicles it is also the ethical duty of cyclists to avoid collisions with other vulnerable road users.)
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#11
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
#12
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Given that bicyclists and motorists draw from the same pool within the human race, I'm not at all surprised that responsibility and irresponsibility are similarly distributed.
OTOH- those figures have been bandied around for decades, and various versions include children. A decent percentage of bicycle/car collisions involve children, and I'm curious whether the 47% number includes children or not.
OTOH- those figures have been bandied around for decades, and various versions include children. A decent percentage of bicycle/car collisions involve children, and I'm curious whether the 47% number includes children or not.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I strongly disagree.
I disagree that north american motorists generally exercise reasonable caution. In fact, our laws and society encourages drivers to favor convenience over caution.
Let me quote the Dutch automobile association
ANWB - Voetganger of fietser
But even when people are driving and/or riding responsibly, and exercising reasonable caution, errors in judgment happen and collisions occur.
“We do not know of a single case of a cyclist fatality in which the driver was prosecuted, except for D.U.I. or hit-and-run,” Leah Shahum, the executive director of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, told me.
The law treats pedestrians and cyclists as weaker participants in traffic... The driver of the motor vehicle is liable for the accident, unless he can prove he was overpowered by circumstances beyond his control (overmacht). The driver must thus prove that none of the blame falls on him, which is extremely difficult in practice.
#14
Senior Member
The margin of error on the guesstimated 47% would likely be high enough to make it a wash. That number was alawyer's guess based on her experience. Get over the bike are more right than cars. There is enough blame for everyone.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
From the article:
"Often as not, they have been wronged, but Hottman consistently quotes a statistic that many riders don’t know or choose to ignore: roughly 47 percent of all bike-car mishaps happen because riders are at fault. That figure is debatable—there’s no national database, and Hottman’s use of it derives from small-sample studies, media accounts, and her own experience working on cases over the years. Still, there’s no doubt that riders often behave recklessly on roads and highways. Ask any driver who’s seen them blow through red lights or come screaming the wrong direction down one-way streets."
This, from a pro-cyclist lawyer, who's simply being a realist. I wonder how many people here would agree with this.
I do believe the 47% rider-is-wrong figure may not be far off the mark.
"Often as not, they have been wronged, but Hottman consistently quotes a statistic that many riders don’t know or choose to ignore: roughly 47 percent of all bike-car mishaps happen because riders are at fault. That figure is debatable—there’s no national database, and Hottman’s use of it derives from small-sample studies, media accounts, and her own experience working on cases over the years. Still, there’s no doubt that riders often behave recklessly on roads and highways. Ask any driver who’s seen them blow through red lights or come screaming the wrong direction down one-way streets."
This, from a pro-cyclist lawyer, who's simply being a realist. I wonder how many people here would agree with this.
I do believe the 47% rider-is-wrong figure may not be far off the mark.
The main causes were riding on sidewalks and salmon riders going the wrong way. It also included children, but there wasn't any distinction made between child and adult accident victim numbers.
#16
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
47% is totally believeable. Also, of the 53% that's caused by motorists, I think a heck of a lot of those would be avoidable by cautious cyclists. I don't always do what I'm "legally allowed" to do because I don't want to be dead right.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#17
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,978
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
I just took a cycling traffic skills class at a local community center put on by the League of American Bicyclists. My local city tracks cycling accidents and 47% is right in the ballpark for the number they came up with; I believe it was actually a bit higher.
The main causes were riding on sidewalks and salmon riders going the wrong way. It also included children, but there wasn't any distinction made between child and adult accident victim numbers.
The main causes were riding on sidewalks and salmon riders going the wrong way. It also included children, but there wasn't any distinction made between child and adult accident victim numbers.
I suspect that some of the more ardent LAB instructors of VC persuasion might come to the same by-the-numbers conclusion about cause/fault with all accidents involving a cyclist in a bike lane and possibly any cyclist not taking a lane.
#18
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,699 Times
in
2,519 Posts
the LAB instructors I know are very practical, and I can only imagine them having a pro-cyclist bias. There are lots of people that ride bikes in a manner that endangers themselves. It's an issue
#19
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
But the flip side is that we also see motorists making poor decisions... but rather than harm the motorist, the poor acting driver is more likely to harm others outside of their vehicle. And the bottom line is that even the best acting cyclist is still quite vulnerable to even the smallest act of poor behavior done by a driver of a couple of tons of glass and metal.
It seems to me that while cyclists have a duty to try to prevent harm to themselves... and let's face it, to also avoid hitting pedestrians... motorists have a responsibility to avoid harming others... including peds and cyclists. That puts a higher level of responsibility on the motorists.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Driving a semi in an urban environment, often transporting haz-mat, I know I can't let my guard down for a moment because even the slightest mistake could lead to a disaster. That said, when I'm on a bicycle it never enters my mind that my responsibilities as a cyclist are any less because I'm less of a hazard.
#21
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
The laws of physics alone dictate that a cyclist is less of a hazard to others than a motor vehicle. That is undeniable. That does not mean that a cyclist can let their guard down... as cyclists are also clearly more vulnerable.
#22
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,699 Times
in
2,519 Posts
I'm trying to decide if the fact that we're the bug and not the windshield really means much. I don't really think it does, although I understand the point. If I do anything that could be considered to be scofflaw behavior, it's because I'm really sure that it's safe.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I figure less of a hazard, but still possibly a hazard, so why even worry about it, and just do the right thing all the time regardless of mode.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,712
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Nor I.
But this misses the point completely. Cars and trucks are extremely dangerous heavy machinery. Collisions between motorvehicles and people are frequently lethal. It is the *ETHICAL* duty of a driver to do everything possible to avoid hitting even the most clueless child, grandma, pedestrian, or cyclist.
(And while bikes are far, far less dangerous than motorvehicles it is also the ethical duty of cyclists to avoid collisions with other vulnerable road users.)
But this misses the point completely. Cars and trucks are extremely dangerous heavy machinery. Collisions between motorvehicles and people are frequently lethal. It is the *ETHICAL* duty of a driver to do everything possible to avoid hitting even the most clueless child, grandma, pedestrian, or cyclist.
(And while bikes are far, far less dangerous than motorvehicles it is also the ethical duty of cyclists to avoid collisions with other vulnerable road users.)
I think you, and many others for that matter, misunderstand the nature of the term "ethics".
Ethics is not a fixed, concrete like thing. What is, and is not, ethical conduct is highly dependent on the particular society and the specific culture of a particular person. Your comments are from a particular perspective; a perspective that is not shared by society at large.
Laws are the arbiters of different views about what is, or is not ethical. That is true for many things that I will not mention here. Just picture protests about this particular practice, or that.
As a cyclist my obligation is not to someone else's ethics, or social viewpoint. It is to the law where I am riding.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I just took a cycling traffic skills class at a local community center put on by the League of American Bicyclists. My local city tracks cycling accidents and 47% is right in the ballpark for the number they came up with; I believe it was actually a bit higher.
The main causes were riding on sidewalks and salmon riders going the wrong way. It also included children, but there wasn't any distinction made between child and adult accident victim numbers.
The main causes were riding on sidewalks and salmon riders going the wrong way. It also included children, but there wasn't any distinction made between child and adult accident victim numbers.