Decent road frames with lots of tire clearance
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Decent road frames with lots of tire clearance
So, I'm thinking of dipping my toes into the C&V world and am looking for something good quality with lots of tire clearance (I've got a set of 38mm panaracer gravelking slicks ready to go although I wouldn't mind a little more clearance perhaps to be used for fenders). I will almost certainly just use the frameset of any bike that I buy. I've got some long pull calipers (tektro r559) although I'd be ok with going cantilever too. I know there are loaded tourers out there that'd fit the bill but I'm not really looking for something so heavy duty, something more in the sport-touring end of things would be nice. The bike will be for general use or what they're calling "gravel" nowadays... A relatively short top tube would be great too although not essential since I could just put a tall stem on a smaller frame.
Any recommendations?
Any recommendations?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,305
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1143 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
965 Posts
Perhaps something like an early Trek that was originally 27" wheeled. Ive converted a couple, plenty of room for fenders to.
Last edited by Mr. 66; 10-08-20 at 08:25 AM.
#3
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,059 Times
in
633 Posts
So, I'm thinking of dipping my toes into the C&V world and am looking for something good quality with lots of tire clearance (I've got a set of 38mm panaracer gravelking slicks ready to go although I wouldn't mind a little more clearance perhaps to be used for fenders). I will almost certainly just use the frameset of any bike that I buy. I've got some long pull calipers (tektro r559) although I'd be ok with going cantilever too. I know there are loaded tourers out there that'd fit the bill but I'm not really looking for something so heavy duty, something more in the sport-touring end of things would be nice. The bike will be for general use or what they're calling "gravel" nowadays... A relatively short top tube would be great too although not essential since I could just put a tall stem on a smaller frame.
Any recommendations?
Any recommendations?
https://modesto.craigslist.org/bik/d...200056543.html
Likes For Lemond1985:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Berea, KY
Posts: 1,135
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 360 Post(s)
Liked 328 Times
in
186 Posts
I had an 84 Trek 500 and 82 Trek 61x. Both would take 700x35 without fenders or 32's with fenders so be choosy when you look at Trek's. Both could handle 38's with fenders when converted to 650b.
__________________
Andy
Andy
Likes For beicster:
#5
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,504
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7350 Post(s)
Liked 2,475 Times
in
1,438 Posts
My 1971 Raleigh Super Course takes 700c 37mm tires with only a little coaxing. The Super Course was made in large volume, so finding one should not be hard. It's a bit on the heavy side, but everyone who rides one says it feels lighter than it is.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Likes For noglider:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenwood SC USA
Posts: 2,252
Bikes: 2002 Mercian Vincitore, 1982 Mercian Colorado, 1976 Puch Royal X, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1971 Gitane Tour de France and others
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 823 Post(s)
Liked 1,395 Times
in
694 Posts
Another vintage Raleigh to consider would be the Competition Mk. II as built c.1973-76 with the sloping fork crown and the rapid-taper chainstays. Mine (shown in fixed-gear mode running a Surly Dingle) has room for 35 mm tires and I bet I could get fenders in there, too. 38s would probably fit, but that would be the upper limit for 700C wheels.
#7
buy my bikes
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,801
Bikes: my very own customized GUNNAR CrossHairs
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 428 Times
in
249 Posts
i spent $80 on a '84 TREK 420 with 27in wheels. with 700c the chainstays clear 35mm (or maybe 37mm) tires barely. I was gonna sell it last spring as complete with updated components, but I couldn't get takers at my price point. So now it's literally hanging out at my inlaws 5 hours away.... i'd like to get it home and ride it.
i have a SCHWINN Super LeTour 12.2 frame that clears 700c x 32mm tires with fenders just Super LeFine. it might go up for sale in the spring. possibly. not sure yet.
PS: did you say "decent"? i'm not sure what "decent" means. like they say: "one man's decent framseset is another man's gas-pipe garbage frameset"
25mm tires I think, and long reach TEKTROs.
with skinny 25mm tires, I think
Super LeTour with 32mm tires and MAFAC Racers
i have a SCHWINN Super LeTour 12.2 frame that clears 700c x 32mm tires with fenders just Super LeFine. it might go up for sale in the spring. possibly. not sure yet.
PS: did you say "decent"? i'm not sure what "decent" means. like they say: "one man's decent framseset is another man's gas-pipe garbage frameset"
25mm tires I think, and long reach TEKTROs.
with skinny 25mm tires, I think
Super LeTour with 32mm tires and MAFAC Racers
Last edited by mrv; 10-08-20 at 09:12 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Wow, quite a list already. I'll do some searching.
I suppose I should qualify "decent". I've had 753 and 531 frames before and something along those lines or roughly equivalent works for me.
Starting with a 27" wheel bike and switching to 700c does look to be a possibility.
I suppose I should qualify "decent". I've had 753 and 531 frames before and something along those lines or roughly equivalent works for me.
Starting with a 27" wheel bike and switching to 700c does look to be a possibility.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,451
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 876 Post(s)
Liked 2,292 Times
in
1,281 Posts
I have a Super Mondia Special 1973 that takes a pretty wide tire. Who ever owned it prior to me changed it to 27" tires and I put some Michelin 27" x 1 1/4" Pro Tek tires on it . When inflated they check 1 3/8" wide! and they clear but not by much. It has Reynolds 531 tubing and nice Nervex lugs. I use it if I have to go over any gravel or dirt . If this bike still had its 700c wheels I am pretty sure your tires would work. I do have to deflate the rear tire to get the wheel off .
Last edited by Kabuki12; 10-08-20 at 09:50 AM.
Likes For Kabuki12:
#10
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,802 Times
in
2,286 Posts
Early 70's Raleighs have very long legs. Forks rarely have clearance issues, chainstay width is almost always the limiting factor. I've fit 700c x 35's (caliper measured width, don't trust the label) on some. Indented chainstays make a big difference.
38's might fit on a Super Course, Gran(d) Sport(s) or Competition.
I'm running 700c x 35's on my Centurion Pro Tour
These are frames I have personal experience runniing wider 700c tires. Early 70's Motobecanes probably would have the same results, but I've only put 650b x 42's on them.
Other's have mentioned 650b conversion, that's a deep rabbit hole to drop into. Since you're just dipping your toe into C&V, I'd recommend not going that route, at least for now.
38's might fit on a Super Course, Gran(d) Sport(s) or Competition.
I'm running 700c x 35's on my Centurion Pro Tour
These are frames I have personal experience runniing wider 700c tires. Early 70's Motobecanes probably would have the same results, but I've only put 650b x 42's on them.
Other's have mentioned 650b conversion, that's a deep rabbit hole to drop into. Since you're just dipping your toe into C&V, I'd recommend not going that route, at least for now.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#11
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,059 Times
in
633 Posts
I was able to fit 700 x 38's on my '76 Raleigh Competition (Reynolds 531). But they just barely cleared on all sides, and if you went through any patch of dirt, the front and rear and brake calipers would instantly clog up with dirt and tires would start rubbing. 700 x 35 are the largest practical tire i can use.
And yes, I'm aware my chain is stretched, it was only a test setup.
And yes, I'm aware my chain is stretched, it was only a test setup.
#12
Senior Member
Be careful if you go the cantilever route. Some frames may be problematic when converting to 700c. Not saying it can't be done but it is something to keep in mind.
#13
buy my bikes
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,801
Bikes: my very own customized GUNNAR CrossHairs
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 428 Times
in
249 Posts
- I think the SCHWINN Super LeTour 12.2 is a double butted 4130 chrom-mo. I'm going to build it up over the winter. I'm debating if I want to spend the cash to get "period correct" components on it. That'll put me into a $50 frameset for what.... $300? Maybe more not sure. And I'll have a nice bike I can sell for what, $150? Probably less? Maybe I'll just build it up and hang it at my in-laws for so I have a Thanksgiving / Christmas visit bike to ride. . . ugh, these first world problems!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Soviet of Oregon or Pensacola FL
Posts: 5,342
Bikes: Still have a few left!
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 467 Post(s)
Liked 532 Times
in
267 Posts
Currently running 35's gravel kings on my 1971 Stella. Another possibility would be a classic touring bike like my Specialized Expedition. At present it has 28's gator skins but could fit much larger tires. Don
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 512
Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times
in
129 Posts
+1 on the early Raleigh Competitions. Mine has "700x38" that caliper at 35mm, with a few mms left at the chain stays - moving to the back of the dropouts might allow a true 38 even. Still oodles of space above tires for fenders, front and back.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
So, I'm thinking of dipping my toes into the C&V world and am looking for something good quality with lots of tire clearance (I've got a set of 38mm panaracer gravelking slicks ready to go although I wouldn't mind a little more clearance perhaps to be used for fenders). I will almost certainly just use the frameset of any bike that I buy. I've got some long pull calipers (tektro r559) although I'd be ok with going cantilever too. I know there are loaded tourers out there that'd fit the bill but I'm not really looking for something so heavy duty, something more in the sport-touring end of things would be nice. The bike will be for general use or what they're calling "gravel" nowadays... A relatively short top tube would be great too although not essential since I could just put a tall stem on a smaller frame.
Any recommendations?
Any recommendations?
#17
Newbie
It would require some wrenching (drop bar conversion) but a Trek Multitrack from the early to mid 1990s might fit your needs. The frame is ripe for a drop bar conversion and has clearance for wider tires than most typical road specific frames. For more weight savings and a modern feel swap out the wheels and drivetrain. The 750 and 790 variants are harder to find than the lower 700 models, but have slightly better frame quality.
#18
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,802 Times
in
2,286 Posts
I was able to fit 700 x 38's on my '76 Raleigh Competition (Reynolds 531). But they just barely cleared on all sides, and if you went through any patch of dirt, the front and rear and brake calipers would instantly clog up with dirt and tires would start rubbing. 700 x 35 are the largest practical tire i can use.
And yes, I'm aware my chain is stretched, it was only a test setup.
And yes, I'm aware my chain is stretched, it was only a test setup.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Cool, I've saved a few searches for the recommendations everyone's made. There really are a lot of raleighs out there. I've found a bunch but all too big so far (a 54 would be about right). There are also a lot of crazy priced bikes...
Likes For Marylander:
#20
Dedicated Detritus Dodger
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Fairfax, California
Posts: 470
Bikes: Some mighty fine ones at that!
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Liked 603 Times
in
247 Posts
I don't know if a hi-ten Centurion Super Le Mans counts as decent (I think so!), but this project in the works happily fits Panaracer Gravel King slicks at 700c x 38 with a few extra mil on each side of the chainstay. Rear brake bridge and front brake both have ample clearance as well.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manhattan & Woodstock NY
Posts: 2,748
Bikes: 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, early '70s Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Raleigh International, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mk1
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 938 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times
in
981 Posts
Ditto that, 35s on a '71 International and a '70 Pro just make it. Later years won't take that width,
__________________
1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport
1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport
#22
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: North New Jersey
Posts: 190
Bikes: Specilized Roubaix, 71 Raleigh Professional, 74 Raliegh Intl, 74 Peugot PX-10, 82 Puegoet PSN, Olmo Competition , Schwinn High Sierra & Others
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times
in
22 Posts
I've been graveling with my Astro Daimler Inter 10 lately. Has room for 700x35's
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841
Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
367 Posts
+1 pm Trek 420 I was able to get 700 x 32 on an 85 frame with room to spare,
Likes For ryansu:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
Psh, I wouldn't be scared of cantilever brakes. They allow you to run wider tires with less problems with the fenders. Plus I toured through Switzerland with sidepulls and I'm done with that life.
I've set up numerous bikes for friends running 700x38 Gravelking slicks on all sorts of '80s tourers, all with canti brakes and VO Zeppelin fenders. I think these make the best gravelbike starter kits. Better frame than a Surly and far less costly. These are the builds I've done or consulted on:
You mention sport touring, instead of a dedicated touring bike. I think many of the aforementioned old Trek sport tourers use pretty thick walled tubing, so there'd not be much difference in weight or flex between many of those and dedicated touring bikes. If you want lightweight/flexible, I think the liveliest one I've tried would be the Voyageur SP. This is made with Columbus 1/.7/1 tubing, similar to what Trek used in a lot of their 600 series in the early '80s, which I think epitomized 'sport tourer.' If you've got nothing against lots of braze-ons, I don't see why a tourer wouldn't be ok, especially in the bigger frame sizes where the stiffness of thick walled tubing is offset by its long length.
I've set up numerous bikes for friends running 700x38 Gravelking slicks on all sorts of '80s tourers, all with canti brakes and VO Zeppelin fenders. I think these make the best gravelbike starter kits. Better frame than a Surly and far less costly. These are the builds I've done or consulted on:
- Nishiki Cresta GT (actually got a 700x42 on the back with ample clearance)
- Nishiki Riviera GT (a little tight)
- Univega Gran Turismo
- Univega Specialissima
- Panasonic Touring Deluxe (used Berthoud fenders but VO will also work)
- Schwinn Voyageur SP (1985; beautiful fenderline in rear with vertical dropouts)
- Fuji Touring Series IV
- Claud Butler Dalesman (mine, do not recommend due to shoddy craftsmanship and tight clearances but it taught me fillet brazing after the frame failed)
You mention sport touring, instead of a dedicated touring bike. I think many of the aforementioned old Trek sport tourers use pretty thick walled tubing, so there'd not be much difference in weight or flex between many of those and dedicated touring bikes. If you want lightweight/flexible, I think the liveliest one I've tried would be the Voyageur SP. This is made with Columbus 1/.7/1 tubing, similar to what Trek used in a lot of their 600 series in the early '80s, which I think epitomized 'sport tourer.' If you've got nothing against lots of braze-ons, I don't see why a tourer wouldn't be ok, especially in the bigger frame sizes where the stiffness of thick walled tubing is offset by its long length.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Last edited by scarlson; 10-09-20 at 11:11 PM.
#25
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
Like others have said, check early Treks out, and don't stick your nose up at those early 410/412/414 bikes/frames circa 1980 with the Ishiwata 022 (Columbus SL double butted numbers) and Mangaloy forks. Lots of tire clearance and really nice riders.
I would recommend '70s Schwinn Paramounts in P15-9 "Touring" form (as I own one), but they are a more reliable 32-33mm tires (measured) + fenders kind of bike then 36-38mm and fenders. Excellent bikes (full DB 531) that are as slow and comfortable as you want, or as strong, rapid, and "ready for it" as you want.
My final suggestion comes in the form of the Specialized Expedition. It's a touring bike with the heart of a thoroughbred. A seriously swift and lithe bike that plays when you want it to and is beautifully sedate, comfortable and stable when you want to take it easier. Frame/fork/headset (25" / 63.5cm) is 3500g, same as the same-size (with chrome) Paramount. Respectable weight for sure. Steering is beautiful, too. Front fork crown is narrow, though I love svelte look. 40mm inner clearance, so 38mm tires will fit, but juuuuuuust barely. 36-37mm tires are close but workable. Getting the canti posts set wider helps a TON, allowing you to get those tires in and out while inflated as opposed to having to deflate (30-32mm width between canti post/boss structures). ~38s and fenders for days? Check. Vertical rear dropouts? Check. Triple bottle cage mounts? Check. Threaded crowns/brake bridges for slick fender mounting? Check.
Cantis can be fussy to set up, and I would be lying if I said my affinity for them didn't rise and fall as I set them up on a bike, but when they work, they're really great, convenient (for tire removal), and look the business while providing great fender clearance. My Expedition is a size too small for me, presently (Nitto Technomic notwithstanding), so a 66.5cm would be perfect instead of the 63.5cm I have right now. Otherwise, I do not exaggerate when I say this bike loves speed.
Mid-post edit: Late '80s to early '90s Cannondale STx00 or T-x00 bikes had cantis with room for 35mm tires (perhaps a touch bigger) and fenders. Strong frames that respond like a race bike when you get out of the saddle, but throw some fenders and racks on them, and they get even smoother.
I would recommend '70s Schwinn Paramounts in P15-9 "Touring" form (as I own one), but they are a more reliable 32-33mm tires (measured) + fenders kind of bike then 36-38mm and fenders. Excellent bikes (full DB 531) that are as slow and comfortable as you want, or as strong, rapid, and "ready for it" as you want.
My final suggestion comes in the form of the Specialized Expedition. It's a touring bike with the heart of a thoroughbred. A seriously swift and lithe bike that plays when you want it to and is beautifully sedate, comfortable and stable when you want to take it easier. Frame/fork/headset (25" / 63.5cm) is 3500g, same as the same-size (with chrome) Paramount. Respectable weight for sure. Steering is beautiful, too. Front fork crown is narrow, though I love svelte look. 40mm inner clearance, so 38mm tires will fit, but juuuuuuust barely. 36-37mm tires are close but workable. Getting the canti posts set wider helps a TON, allowing you to get those tires in and out while inflated as opposed to having to deflate (30-32mm width between canti post/boss structures). ~38s and fenders for days? Check. Vertical rear dropouts? Check. Triple bottle cage mounts? Check. Threaded crowns/brake bridges for slick fender mounting? Check.
Cantis can be fussy to set up, and I would be lying if I said my affinity for them didn't rise and fall as I set them up on a bike, but when they work, they're really great, convenient (for tire removal), and look the business while providing great fender clearance. My Expedition is a size too small for me, presently (Nitto Technomic notwithstanding), so a 66.5cm would be perfect instead of the 63.5cm I have right now. Otherwise, I do not exaggerate when I say this bike loves speed.
Mid-post edit: Late '80s to early '90s Cannondale STx00 or T-x00 bikes had cantis with room for 35mm tires (perhaps a touch bigger) and fenders. Strong frames that respond like a race bike when you get out of the saddle, but throw some fenders and racks on them, and they get even smoother.