Does weight really matter on flat roads?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437
Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times
in
414 Posts
I can feel the difference between my gravel bike (on road tires) and my road bike, mainly when accelerating. Part of it is the 4lb weight difference, but then there's also the gearing, carbon layup/compliance, and aero. At cruising speeds, they feel about the same. The heavier gravel bike actually climbs better, but that's the gearing.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I'm not sure that's true--it's too much of a blanket statement itself. If someone lacks power, a small change in the weight of the bicycle may not have an effect on the ratio of power to weight big enough to be noticed. In other words, that person's acceleration on the lighter bike is still going to be weak. I don't have the math to prove this, but I suspect the stronger rider would actually be more likely to get a noticeable benefit from reducing the weight.
The smaller rider will see a greater impact on his acceleration from 5 pounds difference, because 5 pounds is a greater percentage of his total weight. That result is not really related to his power output, except to the extent that higher power means bigger rider. As you point out, that's not always true though.
#28
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
At the risk of seeming superficial, F=MA, change in weight is proportional to the change in acceleration, whether you can produce a large force or small one. The assumption that most people make about this is that people who produce more power have greater mass.
The smaller rider will see a greater impact on his acceleration from 5 pounds difference, because 5 pounds is a greater percentage of his total weight. That result is not really related to his power output, except to the extent that higher power means bigger rider. As you point out, that's not always true though.
The smaller rider will see a greater impact on his acceleration from 5 pounds difference, because 5 pounds is a greater percentage of his total weight. That result is not really related to his power output, except to the extent that higher power means bigger rider. As you point out, that's not always true though.
As you say, F=MA, but I think you have the implications of that backwards by talking in proportions instead of absolute values.
A=F/M. So if the weight of the two riders and the reduction of weight is the same, then the solution for acceleration has the more powerful rider with the higher F numerator divided by the same M denominator than the less powerful rider. In other words, the more powerful rider gets the bigger speed boost from the same percentage of weight reduction.
Did I get this wrong? I have absolutely no confidence in my physics abilities.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I was assuming all other things, including rider's weight, to be equal. While there may be a weak correlation between size and leg power, I don't think anyone would assume that people who weigh the same or nearly the same produce the same force.
As you say, F=MA, but I think you have the implications of that backwards by talking in proportions instead of absolute values.
As you say, F=MA, but I think you have the implications of that backwards by talking in proportions instead of absolute values.
to clarify, it's mass plus delta mass and acceleration plus delta acceleration. example, If your mass increases by 10%, your acceleration decreases by 10%. 10% of 100 pounds is only 5% of 200 pounds, so the lighter guy loses twice the acceleration of the bigger guy with twice the total weight.
Last edited by wphamilton; 07-05-19 at 11:39 AM.
#30
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Weight doesn't matter, but it makes a big difference. Got it.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 932
Bikes: '04 LeMond Buenos Aires, '82 Bianchi Nuova Racing, De Rosa SLX, Bridgestone MB-1, Guerciotti TSX, Torpado Aelle, LeMond Tourmalet 853, Bridgestone Radac
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times
in
36 Posts
I have no proof but aside from going uphill I think there is a rider/bicycle weight relationship that makes a difference. I kind of don't like my lightest bike sometimes. I'm 6' 2" and ~200lbs; I prefer my heavier steel road bikes over the lightest one.
#32
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Naw, you can talk about (delta M) and (delta A) in the same way.
to clarify, it's mass plus delta mass and acceleration plus delta acceleration. example, If your mass increases by 10%, your acceleration decreases by 10%. 10% of 100 pounds is only 5% of 200 pounds, so the lighter guy loses twice the acceleration of the bigger guy with twice the total weight.
to clarify, it's mass plus delta mass and acceleration plus delta acceleration. example, If your mass increases by 10%, your acceleration decreases by 10%. 10% of 100 pounds is only 5% of 200 pounds, so the lighter guy loses twice the acceleration of the bigger guy with twice the total weight.
You aren't really claiming that it's likely that two 200 pound guys will each produce the same amount of force, are you? Even if they're both muscular, the distribution of that muscle will make a significant difference.
If M and delta M are the same for both riders, and F is higher for one than the other, the one with the higher F will have the bigger increase in A. The change in A will be of the same proportion for the two riders (let's say X percent) but that's X percent of a higher value for A than that for the weaker rider--in other words, a greater increase in m/sec. A 2% increase in speed is a lot larger if you were going 17 mph with the heavier bike than if you were going 10.
Of course if the two equal weight riders are significantly apart in speed to start with (say 24 mph vs, 10 mph), air resistance becomes a factor, but let's not go there.
Last edited by livedarklions; 07-05-19 at 01:13 PM.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
You aren't really claiming that it's likely that two 200 pound guys will each produce the same amount of force, are you? Even if they're both muscular, the distribution of that muscle will make a significant difference.
#35
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I don't know what your point is. If one guy puts out 300 watts, and the other 150 watts, and they both add the same percentage mass, they will both have the same percentage change in acceleration. Does that help?
See above. It makes no difference in the change in acceleration per change in mass.
See above. It makes no difference in the change in acceleration per change in mass.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
And if it's the same percentage change in speed, the one who is moving faster will have the bigger change in absolute terms. A 2 percent increase over 20 mph is twice as big as a two percent increase over 10 mph. Kapish? The stronger rider gets a bigger benefit from the weight reduction.
But more to the point, you are adding an extraneous variable. does weight matter on the flats - this isn't asking if weight can be overcome at some level of power. If you go that way, what about a bad drive train, what about wind, or other extraneous variables?
At higher powers you get more speed, more acceleration. You can have that, but I don't think it's relevant.
#37
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Even that's not necessarily true, depending on the specifics of what the weights are and what his power is.
But more to the point, you are adding an extraneous variable. does weight matter on the flats - this isn't asking if weight can be overcome at some level of power. If you go that way, what about a bad drive train, what about wind, or other extraneous variables?
At higher powers you get more speed, more acceleration. You can have that, but I don't think it's relevant.
But more to the point, you are adding an extraneous variable. does weight matter on the flats - this isn't asking if weight can be overcome at some level of power. If you go that way, what about a bad drive train, what about wind, or other extraneous variables?
At higher powers you get more speed, more acceleration. You can have that, but I don't think it's relevant.
I'm just playing with the variables you brought up when you raised Newton's second law.
#38
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
This is easy.
Just head over to the touring forum and ask the same question.
They will know whether weight matters on the flats.
-Tim-
Just head over to the touring forum and ask the same question.
They will know whether weight matters on the flats.
-Tim-
#39
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Of course weight matters even on the flats... it doesn't keep moving all by itself without any input from the rider.
Try this exaggerated test: Pull an enclosed trailer while empty. (enclosed to maintain the same aerodynamics) Use an electric motor to get up to X speed. (to eliminate acceleration) Accurately measure speed and power output over a flat course.
Then repeat while adding weight inside the trailer. If weight really doesn't matter like some here are saying, you should be able to keep piling it on (hundreds of pounds!) and see no increase in power needed. Does anyone here really think that would happen?
If the difference in weight is only a pound or two, of course the additional power needed will be small, but it is still there. You can say you wouldn't notice the difference, or that it doesn't matter much, but to say there is no difference is inaccurate.
Try this exaggerated test: Pull an enclosed trailer while empty. (enclosed to maintain the same aerodynamics) Use an electric motor to get up to X speed. (to eliminate acceleration) Accurately measure speed and power output over a flat course.
Then repeat while adding weight inside the trailer. If weight really doesn't matter like some here are saying, you should be able to keep piling it on (hundreds of pounds!) and see no increase in power needed. Does anyone here really think that would happen?
If the difference in weight is only a pound or two, of course the additional power needed will be small, but it is still there. You can say you wouldn't notice the difference, or that it doesn't matter much, but to say there is no difference is inaccurate.
Likes For AlmostTrick:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: west michigan
Posts: 189
Bikes: 15 Giant anyroad 1, 16 Trek farley 9.6, 15 Trek domane 5.2 c
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Really depends how far you are going and how much weight. I used to commute alot on bike and had to travel with all kinds of things and I wouldnt want to ride too far with alot of extra weight. You're gunna tire out faster with extra weight no matter what unless its downhill whole way. so usually if you have a heavy load and a ways to go you should try to just roll and pedal just enough to keep yourself coasting. So I'm gunna say yes the weight is the reason i get exhausted while riding.
Last edited by bikingtotown; 07-06-19 at 08:57 PM.
#41
~>~
Actually a Lack of Fitness is "the reason" why one gets "exhausted while riding", not the "weight" of the machine and/or stuff carried on it.
More saddle-time is required for Endurance, for which there is No Substitute.
-Bandera
More saddle-time is required for Endurance, for which there is No Substitute.
-Bandera
#42
Senior Member
Increasing weight increases rolling resistance almost proportionately. And rolling resistance may account for 25 - 50% of power requirements to maintain speed on a flat on a windless day. If we add 4 kg to a 80 kg bike and rider, and we generate 150w of power, we need and extra 2 - 4w of power with a bike that's 4 kg heavier.
To put things in perspective, The rolling resistance of touring tires can easily vary by 25%. Under the same conditions, Just by switching to a different tire, power requirements increase by 9 - 19w.
We need 5x more power to move the same bike with different tires, then we would by adding 4kg to the bikes weight.
To put things in perspective, The rolling resistance of touring tires can easily vary by 25%. Under the same conditions, Just by switching to a different tire, power requirements increase by 9 - 19w.
We need 5x more power to move the same bike with different tires, then we would by adding 4kg to the bikes weight.
#43
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Increasing weight increases rolling resistance almost proportionately. And rolling resistance may account for 25 - 50% of power requirements to maintain speed on a flat on a windless day. If we add 4 kg to a 80 kg bike and rider, and we generate 150w of power, we need and extra 2 - 4w of power with a bike that's 4 kg heavier.
To put things in perspective, The rolling resistance of touring tires can easily vary by 25%. Under the same conditions, Just by switching to a different tire, power requirements increase by 9 - 19w.
We need 5x more power to move the same bike with different tires, then we would by adding 4kg to the bikes weight.
To put things in perspective, The rolling resistance of touring tires can easily vary by 25%. Under the same conditions, Just by switching to a different tire, power requirements increase by 9 - 19w.
We need 5x more power to move the same bike with different tires, then we would by adding 4kg to the bikes weight.
Likes For livedarklions:
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: west michigan
Posts: 189
Bikes: 15 Giant anyroad 1, 16 Trek farley 9.6, 15 Trek domane 5.2 c
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I should really read the original first poster. He seemed to just be talking about the weight of the bike. I thought it was more about carrying stuff total weight. Sounds light enough though I'm sure it will fly. I'm not sure about KG.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,671
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,988 Times
in
1,776 Posts
It's never a simple matter of weight alone, LOL! Too many other factors figure in. Today was a prime example. I took out the old SL tubed Ribble bike. It weighs 19 lbs, 7 ozs and has on some 40mm deep and light carbon fiber tubular wheels. I did my normal base 25 mile route. I worked really hard today but the flex of this 1985 race built frame under my 175 lbs meant that no matter how hard I tried I couldn't hold the higher speed I wanted to. Ran 19.1 mph avg and it was work. It just wasn't there in this bike and it's current configuration. Yet two days ago I took out the PDG Series Paramount made with oversize Tange Prestige and rode the exact same route with another 3 mile diversion and finished with a 20.2 mph avg. Yet this bike is over 2 1/2 lbs heavier with a wheelset over a pound heavier and not as deep. Both bikes are 53/42T with identical 8 speed cassettes. The fit is the same in terms of saddle height, setback, crank arm length, reach, handlebar width, etc. The heavier bike is consistently one of my fastest. It also is one of my better climbers which totally goes against what the experts will say. A well designed bike can help offset a "weight penalty" IMHO.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
Last edited by jamesdak; 07-09-19 at 09:24 AM.
Likes For jamesdak:
#46
Senior Member
Easier, faster acceleration is better in every situation on a bicycle. IMO. Better in the hills and better on flat terrain.
One day I'm going to do a test for myself and compare the roll of my Schwinn to my Specialized. I am almost certain the Scwhinn wins that race. One half pedal stroke and see how far I glide. As mentioned the Scwhinn is 40lbs. and the Specialized is 22lbs.
Will the heavier bike always win that simple test.??
#47
Senior Member
Imagine the bike is a hammer. Imagine the saddle is the hammerhead. Now do you want to sit on a 11kg hammer or a 7 kg hammer?
#49
Cycleway town
Of course weight matters even on the flats... it doesn't keep moving all by itself without any input from the rider.
Try this exaggerated test: Pull an enclosed trailer while empty. (enclosed to maintain the same aerodynamics) Use an electric motor to get up to X speed. (to eliminate acceleration) Accurately measure speed and power output over a flat course.
Then repeat while adding weight inside the trailer. If weight really doesn't matter like some here are saying, you should be able to keep piling it on (hundreds of pounds!) and see no increase in power needed. Does anyone here really think that would happen?
If the difference in weight is only a pound or two, of course the additional power needed will be small, but it is still there. You can say you wouldn't notice the difference, or that it doesn't matter much, but to say there is no difference is inaccurate.
Try this exaggerated test: Pull an enclosed trailer while empty. (enclosed to maintain the same aerodynamics) Use an electric motor to get up to X speed. (to eliminate acceleration) Accurately measure speed and power output over a flat course.
Then repeat while adding weight inside the trailer. If weight really doesn't matter like some here are saying, you should be able to keep piling it on (hundreds of pounds!) and see no increase in power needed. Does anyone here really think that would happen?
If the difference in weight is only a pound or two, of course the additional power needed will be small, but it is still there. You can say you wouldn't notice the difference, or that it doesn't matter much, but to say there is no difference is inaccurate.
If you're 200 lbs with 1.5in tyres on flat lands I really don't think swapping your cro-mo frame for a carbon one is gonna have much effect, all else the same.
However, changing other thing might work better (tyre tread, handle bar position, etc).
You'll probably gain more by locking out a suspension fork, you might find steel more comfortable, but ultimately the lighter the better if it's otherwise like-for-like.
Cars work better when they're lighter, I got a power:weight ratio of over 200bhp per ton out of a car with a little 1.6 litre engine and that went like a Scalextrix car!
#50
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
That's obvious, but a pretty silly hypothetical. Either the components or the frame would have to be different in order for there to be a significant weight difference. But to play along, how much more would you pay for the identical but lighter bike?