newbie: rear derailleur and gearing!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
newbie: rear derailleur and gearing!
Hello!
I just got my first cx bike and recently went to a local cx clinic to learn how to mount, dismount, etc.
Anyway...my bike currently has a road compact 50/34 up front. And a 12-27 cassette in the rear. Is this ok? To be honest, I wished I had a larger cog during the cx clinics 40 minute post instructional race! Also...I have a SRAM XX rear derailleur. Should I swap that out for a SRAM road derailleur? Or keep the mountain derailleur on it?
Thanks!
I just got my first cx bike and recently went to a local cx clinic to learn how to mount, dismount, etc.
Anyway...my bike currently has a road compact 50/34 up front. And a 12-27 cassette in the rear. Is this ok? To be honest, I wished I had a larger cog during the cx clinics 40 minute post instructional race! Also...I have a SRAM XX rear derailleur. Should I swap that out for a SRAM road derailleur? Or keep the mountain derailleur on it?
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sherwood, OR
Posts: 1,279
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked 309 Times
in
180 Posts
What you have is fine.
A larger cog in the back would only get used, and you don't want that in a race. If you need lower gearing for the steep stuff, you should probably be running anyway.
A mountain RD will probably be more durable that an RD, so any difference in performance or weight wouldn't be noticeable.
A larger cog in the back would only get used, and you don't want that in a race. If you need lower gearing for the steep stuff, you should probably be running anyway.
A mountain RD will probably be more durable that an RD, so any difference in performance or weight wouldn't be noticeable.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That gearing is fine. At some point you might want chainrings that are more closely spaced. The hot combo these days is 36/46. 50/34 is such a big jump that it's not terribly usable in a race.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I've always found that (for me) even 46-36 isn't useful, mostly because I never need the 46. I've gone with a 1x10 setup. I've been using a 36 in front, but I feel like it allows me to be too slow (CX races have a way of moving you into your lowest gear) so I'm swapping in a 38. My biggest concern about 50-34 would be that I'd spend too much time in the 34-27 gear.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#7
or tarckeemoon, depending
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the pesto of cities
Posts: 7,017
Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've always found that (for me) even 46-36 isn't useful, mostly because I never need the 46. I've gone with a 1x10 setup. I've been using a 36 in front, but I feel like it allows me to be too slow (CX races have a way of moving you into your lowest gear) so I'm swapping in a 38. My biggest concern about 50-34 would be that I'd spend too much time in the 34-27 gear.
Only bad thing about a MTB rd is it's longer so it can snag on stuff, but it's paid for, so ride it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Givmedew
Road Cycling
5
07-11-16 11:37 AM
Steve90068
Bicycle Mechanics
42
01-28-11 09:02 PM
jmeans53
Bicycle Mechanics
9
08-22-10 08:19 PM