Can lighter and stiffer bike make climbing significantly faster
#26
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 200
Bikes: 2018 Jamis Renegade Exploit, 1996 Trek 930, mid-90's Dean El Diente, 2010 Scott Addict SL, 1998 Trek 730, Xtracycle EdgeRunner 30D, Xtracycle Swoop, 1992 Trek 790
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 87 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times
in
62 Posts
Not quite answering what you asked, but if you're looking for a way to spend some money to get faster, have you done a professional bike fit? It's possible some simple tweaks to your position on the bike might get you more gains than a lighter bike. If you do decide to get a carbon bike later, you'll know what size and geometry you should look at, and you can match the fit on the new bike to the old one as a good starting point.
#28
Senior Member
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,970 Times
in
4,692 Posts
You can train with a power meter, with a HR monitor, with RPE...And the bike's weight has no impact.
To be clear: a heavier bike is not a training advantage.
#30
Senior Member
My point: making a TRAINING bike lighter isn't helping with he training effort. it will make a difference for a race day bike, obviously, because there speed matters.
Likes For HerrKaLeun:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,970 Times
in
4,692 Posts
Going up a hill with a lighter bike should be the exact same effort as with a heavier bike. Only difference, the lighter bike will be a bit faster at given effort. Sot he training effect (growing muscles, lung training, heart etc.) should be the same. Power meter also should read the same.
My point: making a TRAINING bike lighter isn't helping with he training effort. it will make a difference for a race day bike, obviously, because there speed matters.
My point: making a TRAINING bike lighter isn't helping with he training effort. it will make a difference for a race day bike, obviously, because there speed matters.
Coincidentally, I do much of my winter and spring training on a rather heavy bike, but that is because I choose the bike with a very comfy Brooks saddle, fenders, and sturdy steel frame and fork. But anyone who is worried about speed when training is not doing it correctly.
#32
Senior Member
Agreed, and thanks for the clarification. We are in agreement.
Coincidentally, I do much of my winter and spring training on a rather heavy bike, but that is because I choose the bike with a very comfy Brooks saddle, fenders, and sturdy steel frame and fork. But anyone who is worried about speed when training is not doing it correctly.
Coincidentally, I do much of my winter and spring training on a rather heavy bike, but that is because I choose the bike with a very comfy Brooks saddle, fenders, and sturdy steel frame and fork. But anyone who is worried about speed when training is not doing it correctly.
If it wasn't for the slightly different seating position, all racers should ride a fatbike for training. Use cheap tires and you even pedal when most people coast = added training!
if you want to train, use some strap and attach to a pulled brake lever :-)
Likes For HerrKaLeun:
#33
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Otto
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I was never a real weight weenie, but many decades ago I tried to get my bike lighter and actually cut an inch off an aluminum seat post. I really have to look back and laugh at that one.
For me the rationale was not having the lightest bike that I could get, it was to make my bike as light as I could so when I was struggling up a hill I knew it was not the bike. It was just psychological.
Speed is relative, personal speed is one thing and if it important to you then go lighter and stiffer. Competitive speed is something else. Until you are smoking everyone else on a climb, it isn’t important.
John
For me the rationale was not having the lightest bike that I could get, it was to make my bike as light as I could so when I was struggling up a hill I knew it was not the bike. It was just psychological.
Speed is relative, personal speed is one thing and if it important to you then go lighter and stiffer. Competitive speed is something else. Until you are smoking everyone else on a climb, it isn’t important.
John
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: socal
Posts: 4,266
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 883 Post(s)
Liked 824 Times
in
623 Posts
I've never read anything definitive about this topic (and wish someone would tackle it), but intuitively think (from my experience) that weight off the bike is more important for climbing. In any event, Mother Nature doesn't acquiesce; less weight means better efficiency. Lose a couple of pounds off the bike and your power/weight ratio will increase and you'll ascend faster everything else being equal. I doubt the difference in stiffness will have influence unless one or the other isn't adequate.
#37
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
A carbon bike isn't going to improve your fitness or make you a better rider....Continue training on your aluminum bike.
Likes For wolfchild:
#39
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,099 Times
in
3,833 Posts
Carbon fiber material can be manipulated in ways that metals cannot, including fine-tuning of how the structure reacts to pedaling forces. In my own experience, I've owned bikes built from steel, titanium, aluminum, and carbon fiber. Both of the CF frames I've owned have been stiffer than the three aluminum frames I've owned. My current CF frame is noticeably stiffer in the BB than my previous CF frame. I'm not saying that all CF frames are stiffer than all alum frames, but it would be inaccurate to say that all alum frames are stiffer than all CF frames.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#40
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,099 Times
in
3,833 Posts
I had an alum Colnago in the early 2000s that was quite soft compared with the CF frame I also had at the time. The alum Felt that followed the Colnago closed the gap, but the CF was still stiffer.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 727
Bikes: Current: 2016 Bianchi Volpe; 1973 Peugeot UO-8. Past: 1974 Fuji S-10-S with custom black Imron paint by Stinsman Racing of PA.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
142 Posts
You could explain why would you "rather climb with a 15lb aluminum bike than a 23lb carbon bike any day" ?
But isnt bike weight different that rider weight? For example, lighter wheels means you ride faster, dont they? Or you are saying if I ride 5kg bike and weight 70kg, I will ride as fast as if I ride 10kg bike and weight 65kg?
But isnt bike weight different that rider weight? For example, lighter wheels means you ride faster, dont they? Or you are saying if I ride 5kg bike and weight 70kg, I will ride as fast as if I ride 10kg bike and weight 65kg?
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
248 Posts
You're the engine, so remember that as the "first factor" regardless of what's under you. Second, weight is a bigger factor than stiffness. I'd rather climb with a 15lb aluminum bike than a 23lb carbon bike any day. Third, it's easier for me to lose 3lbs than it is to make a 23lb bike become a 20lb bike (cheaper, too). Fourth, I only hear sprinters fussing about stiffness, rarely climbers.
I test rode a Serotta Ottrot about 15 years ago, and I was riding (still ride) a 1995 Cannodale T700 (aluminum frame touring bike). The weight difference between the two bikes was probably in the neighborhood of 10 lb, my touring rig had 35mm tires while the Ottrot had 23 mm tires, the bars on the Ottrot were significantly wider, etc. Was I faster while climbing? Definitely. Was the difference "significant"? Well, I was no threat to the Tour de France riding either bike so, no, not really. However, the difference in feel was like night and day. I felt like I was flying up the climbs. One climb that I normally had to take out of the saddle on my Cannondale in a 32 x 25 gear I was spinning in the saddle on the Ottrot in a 39 x 25 gear.
I guess I'd answer the OP's question by saying that, objectively there may be a small but measurable increase in speed and that subjectively there could be a "significant" difference. The magnitude of the objective and subjective differences depend on many factors, including not only the differences in weight and "stiffness", but in tires/tire pressure, relative weight of the wheels, width of bars, etc. - even differences in stand-over height can have an effect on how fast a bike feels.
Likes For noimagination:
Likes For utoner34:
#46
Senior Member
Yes. When racing in the Alps and Pyrenees back in the day, we had (some of us) special bikes. These bikes were lighter than the bikes we used on the flats. They had lighter frames, wheels, and tires, and were geared better. However, there was more risk of punctures (like the '98 Tour in which Jan Ulrich punctured, and Pantani went on to with the stage and the Tour).
#47
Senior Member
Thoughtful answer: as stated here many times, weight is your enemy going uphill. A lighter bike will climb faster and save you precious seconds in your grand tour or local Wednesday Worlds.
Wiseguy answer: You can get the same savings by losing 5lbs, taking only one water bottle and removing unnecessary keys from your pocket. Cost: zero.
The real answer: Let's understand the real question: should you buy that new bike? Hell yes, buy the bike! Just having a new bike will make you not only faster, but the envy of your mates. You will love riding it, taking pictures of it, talking about it and just looking at it. In your mind, Phil Liggett will narrate all of your epic climbs as you "dance on your pedals" on the way to a mountaintop world championship.
Wiseguy answer: You can get the same savings by losing 5lbs, taking only one water bottle and removing unnecessary keys from your pocket. Cost: zero.
The real answer: Let's understand the real question: should you buy that new bike? Hell yes, buy the bike! Just having a new bike will make you not only faster, but the envy of your mates. You will love riding it, taking pictures of it, talking about it and just looking at it. In your mind, Phil Liggett will narrate all of your epic climbs as you "dance on your pedals" on the way to a mountaintop world championship.