Cross Tires for Dummies
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,873 Times
in
1,440 Posts
Cross Tires for Dummies
I demonstrated my total ignorance of tire tread recently on a thread in the racing sub-forum. I'm guessing I'm not alone on this, particularly among beginning cross racers.
It seemed like it would be a good idea to start a thread that explained several aspects of tire tread in a simple, newbie-friendly way. Every web page I've found seems to assume at least that you can tell the difference between a file tread and a tractor tread or whatever else, which for me hasn't been a good assumption.
I thought maybe if I kicked something off and people who know what they're talking about added some input, this could morph into a good sticky thread.
To that end, I thought I'd begin by throwing up some pictures of various tires and ask what you can tell me about it based on the tread pattern. Like, what would you call this tread pattern? What conditions would it be best for? What are its weaknesses? What makes it different/similar to the other tires? Tell me things like that.
By the way, I'm borrowing all these images from Bike Tires Direct on the good faith that they'd be OK with that as long as I gave them a plug. Go buy some tires from them so they don't get mad at me.
Schwalbe Racing Ralph
Type: All around
Schwalbe CX Pro Light
Type: All around
Kenda Kross Supreme
Type: All around
Michelin Mud2
Type: Mud
Michelin Jet
Type: File
Continental Speed King Cross
Type: All around
Maxxis MiMo CX
Type: All around
Geax Mezcal
Type: File
Feel free to comment on just one tire, or a few. Please don't "quote" the pictures.
If I'm missing some important tire type, let me know.
It seemed like it would be a good idea to start a thread that explained several aspects of tire tread in a simple, newbie-friendly way. Every web page I've found seems to assume at least that you can tell the difference between a file tread and a tractor tread or whatever else, which for me hasn't been a good assumption.
I thought maybe if I kicked something off and people who know what they're talking about added some input, this could morph into a good sticky thread.
To that end, I thought I'd begin by throwing up some pictures of various tires and ask what you can tell me about it based on the tread pattern. Like, what would you call this tread pattern? What conditions would it be best for? What are its weaknesses? What makes it different/similar to the other tires? Tell me things like that.
By the way, I'm borrowing all these images from Bike Tires Direct on the good faith that they'd be OK with that as long as I gave them a plug. Go buy some tires from them so they don't get mad at me.
Schwalbe Racing Ralph
Type: All around
Schwalbe CX Pro Light
Type: All around
Kenda Kross Supreme
Type: All around
Michelin Mud2
Type: Mud
Michelin Jet
Type: File
Continental Speed King Cross
Type: All around
Maxxis MiMo CX
Type: All around
Geax Mezcal
Type: File
Feel free to comment on just one tire, or a few. Please don't "quote" the pictures.
If I'm missing some important tire type, let me know.
Last edited by Andy_K; 09-16-09 at 03:55 PM. Reason: Took a guess at file types
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If this thread is for dummies, it's worth saying that the UCI forbids the use of tyres wider than 35mm... The Marathon Extreme - sibling to the Marathon Supreme and the Ultremo racing tyre, but with added durability and off road grip - comes in 35mm: Marathon claim that this is a very fast roller - just a notch behind the Supreme and Marathon Racer. It's meant for adventure touring.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152
Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,873 Times
in
1,440 Posts
That link gives specific evaluations of each specific tire it reviews. What I'd like to accomplish with this thread is to provide something so that anyone who reads it can look at any tire and figure out, based on tread, what type of tread it is and what it will be good (and bad) for. Ideally, they'd also be able to look at two tires in the same category and guess what their relative strengths and weaknesses will be.
Edit: looking closer, I'm not sure I can tell from that link what differentiates mud tires from all-arounders.
#7
Oh The Huge Manatee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mabra
Posts: 4,528
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i was say mich muds are a better option than the grifo for a all around clincher tire.
then i would go with the racing ralph followed by the grifo.
then perhaps hutch bulldogs.
other than that wake me when you are ready for tubulars
then i would go with the racing ralph followed by the grifo.
then perhaps hutch bulldogs.
other than that wake me when you are ready for tubulars
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,873 Times
in
1,440 Posts
Alright, I took some guesses at the types for each of these. How did I do?
File tread, I think I understand. It's basically flat with just enough texture to grab a rough surface, so it will be fast on flat, hard surfaces but provide some traction.
All around? Looks basically like a skinny mountain bike tire. I know mountain bikers would add some further descriptors within this type. I'm wondering about things like tread shape, height and spacing. What effect do they have?
Mud? Putting the Mud2 in this category was a gimme. From what I've been able to tell, the key here is having blocks far enough apart that they don't collect mud. It seems like skinnier is better. Is short tread also good? Basically, I'm not sure what moves something from "all-around" to "mud" but the distinction seems to be important. My races will all be mudders within a month, so I really want to understand this.
File tread, I think I understand. It's basically flat with just enough texture to grab a rough surface, so it will be fast on flat, hard surfaces but provide some traction.
All around? Looks basically like a skinny mountain bike tire. I know mountain bikers would add some further descriptors within this type. I'm wondering about things like tread shape, height and spacing. What effect do they have?
Mud? Putting the Mud2 in this category was a gimme. From what I've been able to tell, the key here is having blocks far enough apart that they don't collect mud. It seems like skinnier is better. Is short tread also good? Basically, I'm not sure what moves something from "all-around" to "mud" but the distinction seems to be important. My races will all be mudders within a month, so I really want to understand this.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,873 Times
in
1,440 Posts
I've been surprised to see that a lot of the articles that try to address this topic start with a long discussion about whether you should choose clinchers or tubulars and then it always boils it down to, "you should choose tubulars" without qualification or exception.
I completely believe that, but since I'm trying to make this a discussion for newbs like myself, I'm not sure it's worth even bringing tubulars into the picture other than to mention that as the ultimate destination.
Personally, I'm at an ability level where it's hard to justify replacing the stock tires that came with my bike, never mind sinking $300+ into a wheelset and another $200 into tires. But I do want to understand my choices so when I replace the stock tires I won't just get tires because they look cool.
I completely believe that, but since I'm trying to make this a discussion for newbs like myself, I'm not sure it's worth even bringing tubulars into the picture other than to mention that as the ultimate destination.
Personally, I'm at an ability level where it's hard to justify replacing the stock tires that came with my bike, never mind sinking $300+ into a wheelset and another $200 into tires. But I do want to understand my choices so when I replace the stock tires I won't just get tires because they look cool.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,183
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152
Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Alright, I took some guesses at the types for each of these. How did I do?
File tread, I think I understand. It's basically flat with just enough texture to grab a rough surface, so it will be fast on flat, hard surfaces but provide some traction.
All around? Looks basically like a skinny mountain bike tire. I know mountain bikers would add some further descriptors within this type. I'm wondering about things like tread shape, height and spacing. What effect do they have?
Mud? Putting the Mud2 in this category was a gimme. From what I've been able to tell, the key here is having blocks far enough apart that they don't collect mud. It seems like skinnier is better. Is short tread also good? Basically, I'm not sure what moves something from "all-around" to "mud" but the distinction seems to be important. My races will all be mudders within a month, so I really want to understand this.
File tread, I think I understand. It's basically flat with just enough texture to grab a rough surface, so it will be fast on flat, hard surfaces but provide some traction.
All around? Looks basically like a skinny mountain bike tire. I know mountain bikers would add some further descriptors within this type. I'm wondering about things like tread shape, height and spacing. What effect do they have?
Mud? Putting the Mud2 in this category was a gimme. From what I've been able to tell, the key here is having blocks far enough apart that they don't collect mud. It seems like skinnier is better. Is short tread also good? Basically, I'm not sure what moves something from "all-around" to "mud" but the distinction seems to be important. My races will all be mudders within a month, so I really want to understand this.
you would have a hard time going wrong with mich muds, but if you have a chance just chat up someone like Erik Tonkin on the subject.
#12
Señor Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 196
Bikes: Motobecane Immortal, Van Dessel Gin & Trombones, Rawland Stag, Bianchi SASS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What would help most on off camber turns in wet grass and mud typical of PacNW?
I've currently got WTB Cross Wolf tires thinking the side knobs would help. What do you guys think?
Also, Is there a noticeable performance difference between 700x32 and 700x35?
I've currently got WTB Cross Wolf tires thinking the side knobs would help. What do you guys think?
Also, Is there a noticeable performance difference between 700x32 and 700x35?
#13
Batüwü Creakcreak
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,795
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
161 Posts
Someone I've talked to recommended challenge grifo's in a 32 for every condition.
If they're good enough for him, I'm pretty sure they're good enough for anyone...
35 will be grippier than 32, but will be slower on the flatter stuff and road-ish stuff. 32 should be more than enough for most courses.
If they're good enough for him, I'm pretty sure they're good enough for anyone...
35 will be grippier than 32, but will be slower on the flatter stuff and road-ish stuff. 32 should be more than enough for most courses.
#14
Oh The Huge Manatee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mabra
Posts: 4,528
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,873 Times
in
1,440 Posts
Dang it! I was talking to Erik just last night (he coaches the cross clinic I went to), and this wasn't among the many things I asked him. Oh well, I've been meaning to make a trip to Sellwood anyway. I guess I'll go buy some tires from him when I go.
#17
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
I put 1 season of training and racing on 1 set and the front still looks great but I need a new one for the rear. It's ok, but gets sloppy in looser stuff.
I am using some Vittoria Cross EVO XG tubulars that I have as a "training" set that I finally got glued up last night and I picked up a set of Griffos (in a 30 - because that's all I could get) for my "race" wheels that I have yet to build...which is funny because the races start this week... Suck.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152
Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am just using this thread to call attention to my new signature, as you cant use tubbies with tubes in the SW
#19
Steel snob by accident
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 648
Bikes: Masi steel cross, Torelli steel roadie, Brew steel bmx
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i have rithey speed maxes. pretty smooth center, and plenty big knobs on the side for cornering confidence. also seemed to help me with off camber turns too. Mine are 35s ran mine at 40 btw
#20
Don't smoke, Mike.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,295
Bikes: Devinci Tosca, IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like these tires a lot. Mostly I race them in early season point-to-point races through the countryside (gravel/dirt roads, singletrack, the remains of last year's corn crop, etc.).
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 1,990
Bikes: Dawes Kalahari, Puch Prima Super Sport, Graham Weigh 853
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Someone I've talked to recommended challenge grifo's in a 32 for every condition.
If they're good enough for him, I'm pretty sure they're good enough for anyone...
35 will be grippier than 32, but will be slower on the flatter stuff and road-ish stuff. 32 should be more than enough for most courses.
If they're good enough for him, I'm pretty sure they're good enough for anyone...
35 will be grippier than 32, but will be slower on the flatter stuff and road-ish stuff. 32 should be more than enough for most courses.
Don't forget the Vredestein Premiato.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
What do you think of the Specialized Houffalize CX Pro (32mm)?
They carry these at my LBS (and I think they'll still give me team discount if I ask nicely )
They carry these at my LBS (and I think they'll still give me team discount if I ask nicely )
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,873 Times
in
1,440 Posts
At first glance that looked like it had an inverted tread, but I suppose that's just the picture background on the bottom left.
The tread looks similar to my Maxxis Locust CX, which quickly become slicks in heavy mud, but drop it again once I get in some grass.
The tread looks similar to my Maxxis Locust CX, which quickly become slicks in heavy mud, but drop it again once I get in some grass.
#24
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,340
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
I have one of the Specialized tires. I really like it. I find that the traction is almost on par with my tubulars. Are you shopping at Mikes? What team are you on?
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
No, I saw them in person at the LBS and they are knobbies, but have a center section that look like they'd be better for grass and packed dirt than the Michelin Mud 2. It's figuring to be a long hot fall here in NorCal, so I think it's going to be mostly gravel and hardpan, at least until December.