Originally Posted by Troul
(Post 22642436)
Have you considered speedplay zeros? Biggest drawback is the shoe selection if adapters are not your thing.
Fun stuff. |
Originally Posted by terrymorse
(Post 22642459)
There's also the fun of walking on those Speedplay cleats. Less walking, actually, more mincing. Or carrying cleat clovers, having them fall off while walking about, and retracing your steps to find the lost cleat cover.
Fun stuff. |
Originally Posted by terrymorse
(Post 22642459)
There's also the fun of walking on those Speedplay cleats. Less walking, actually, more mincing. Or carrying cleat clovers, having them fall off while walking about, and retracing your steps to find the lost cleat cover.
Fun stuff. |
Originally Posted by Maelochs
(Post 22642247)
Basically you were inept and didn't bother to learn how to use the gear, and are blaming the gear for your unwillingness to master it.
Okay. At least not in my case, not the way I ride. You want to ride clipped in, knock yourself out. Unlike some of you judgy types, I believe you can do whatever the hell makes you happy. |
Originally Posted by freeranger
(Post 22642285)
Use whatever works for you. But just because something didn't work for you doesn't mean it's a bad idea, or may not be of benefit for someone else. FWIW, I tried clipless pedals after I bought a road bike. Had ridden mtn bikes prior, with pinned flats, as the terrain I was riding sometimes demanded a dab to happen quickly and unexpectedly. Figured with the road bike, since the need to get a foot off the pedal would be forseen easily, I gave clipless a try. Wasn't for me, so went back to pinned flats on the road bike also. Clipless are not for me, but others find them useful, which is fine with me. Ride what works for you, and keeps the wheels turning!
|
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
(Post 22642342)
You gave up after one 20 mile ride?
|
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642514)
At least not in my case, not the way I ride.
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642514)
Unlike some of you judgy types, I believe you can do whatever the hell makes you happy.
|
I don't care how any of you ride. But if you make specious arguments i will note that.
Trying to "prove" that your way is better is pointless and in fact, impossible. There is no objective evidence to justify Any preference. But seriously, if i am deaf and talk a lot about which bands don't impress me, are you going to listen closely to my opinions? If you give me two cars to test and I say one is better, are you going to listen to my judgment after you find out that i crashed the second one before the test? You know you don't like cleats. You knew it before you started. You had a bunch of accidents because apparently you never bothered to learn to use them. You have Zero objective evidence showing they are as good, better, or less good than ... what you prefer. You never did a valid test. You preference alone is all the validation you should need. You want it, that's it. A lot of people start threads here here trying to "prove" that what they like is quantifiably better. It is pitiful and pathetic. Which color is better? What is the best song? Why people cannot distinguish between subjective and objective .... maybe there is something to the "dumbing down" of the U.S. educational system. |
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642518)
If people actually bothered to read my post, this is pretty much exactly what I said. I don't like them and I don't see a benefit. But I clearly state that if it's your thing, then you do you.
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642514)
You guys defend clipping in all you want. But the data is out there. Clipping in gives modest gains in power, at best. So you can promote the additional expense and complication if you want. But I am immune to hype. The **** to worth ratio analysis shows no advantage.
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642200)
I suppose if you do a lot of riding in the rain or snow or an oil storm(?) then I can see how keeping your feet clipped to the pedals could give you some reassurance. So there's that. And if I was ever sponsored by a manufacturer that required me using their product, sure,
You're a novice rider who tried clipless for a few rides and then comes onto a cycling forum (in which the average member has vastly more experience and knowledge than you) to tell a whole bunch of us that we're fools. You've got quite a Dunning Kruger effect going on. |
Originally Posted by Koyote
(Post 22642549)
You're a novice rider who tried [insert choice here] for a few rides and then comes onto a cycling forum (in which the average member has vastly more experience and knowledge than you) to tell a whole bunch of us that we're fools.
|
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 22642523)
This is the most insightful thing you've said. If I rode like you ride, I wouldn't use clipless, either. If you rode like I ride, you wouldn't do so without clipless pedals, either.
Yet you insinuate that the majority of us are only buying in to hype, fashion and/or the emulation or pros. Seems awfully judgy to me. :foo: And the fact that so many of you have your panties in a wad over my opinion does speak to the issue all by itself. |
Originally Posted by Maelochs
(Post 22642527)
I don't care how any of you ride. But if you make specious arguments i will note that.
Trying to "prove" that your way is better is pointless and in fact, impossible. There is no objective evidence to justify Any preference. But seriously, if i am deaf and talk a lot about which bands don't impress me, are you going to listen closely to my opinions? If you give me two cars to test and I say one is better, are you going to listen to my judgment after you find out that i crashed the second one before the test? You know you don't like cleats. You knew it before you started. You had a bunch of accidents because apparently you never bothered to learn to use them. You have Zero objective evidence showing they are as good, better, or less good than ... what you prefer. You never did a valid test. You preference alone is all the validation you should need. You want it, that's it. A lot of people start threads here here trying to "prove" that what they like is quantifiably better. It is pitiful and pathetic. Which color is better? What is the best song? Why people cannot distinguish between subjective and objective .... maybe there is something to the "dumbing down" of the U.S. educational system. You do you and I'll do me. |
VegasJen - learn to shift. Also, I can ride atop(not clipped in) my spd pedals without issue. If one isn't clipped and the other is, just pedal with the clipped in leg while your unclipped foot attaches to the pedal. Pretty simple.
But most importantly - learn to shift. You won't then get stuck in a bad gear riding up a hill. |
I'm guessing now (and I should have known by the mention of flame suit in the thread title) that you just want to argue about clipless pedals. I think you could have learned more and perhaps got better results had you posted something more along the line of asking for tips how to use foot retention and using the resources of this board's membership rather than alienating some of the people you think have panties in a wad.
Some of the more notorious trolls have recently been banned otherwise they would perhaps join in with you. |
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642647)
But you're inferring that I'm judging everybody against the gotta-have-the-gear standard. I'm not.
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642647)
And the fact that so many of you have your panties in a wad over my opinion does speak to the issue all by itself.
|
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642647)
The fact is the data doesn't support the efficiency argument.
As I wrote elsewhere: One thing that often gets overlooked when folks cite studies on "Pedaling Efficiency" (that demonstrate the downstroke produces positive torque while the upstroke produces negative torque) and conclude that this must be a reason why clipless pedals or toeclips are unnecessary, is that they may be confusing Efficiency with Efficacy. Efficiency is a fairly objective measurement; it's defined as the ratio of the useful work performed by a machine or in a process to the total energy expended (or heat taken in). Yes, putting all of your force into the downstroke of a pedal (and little-to-none into the upstroke) will produce more useful work -- make the bike go faster or farther -- or it will expend less energy, than having a uniform pedal stroke with consistent power around the full 360°. But often our cycling goals aren't concerned with absolute Efficiency; our goals while riding aren't necessarily to always Maximize The Ratio Of Useful Work To Energy Expended. Sometimes our cycling goals are a bit more abstract ...like, Win The Race. Or Get To The End Of The Ride Without Bonking. This is where Efficacy trumps Efficiency. Achieving these abstract goals often requires that you temporarily ride in an inefficient manner. Because pulling on the upstroke or applying power through all 360° of the pedal stroke can distribute the workload to less-sore/tired muscles, and/or it can allow for more instantaneous acceleration. And being able to selectively do those things can often allow the cyclist to be more effective at achieving their ultimate goal. And clipless pedals or toe clips have been shown empirically to aid the Efficacy of those strategies. |
as a rider who has been "clipped in" since 1994....
cool. you do you. |
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642647)
I made the attempt to use "clipless" pedals. The fact is the data doesn't support the efficiency argument. Not my opinion, but studies by people that live and breathe cycling. So that leaves really only two viable arguments. 1) you feel more in control and stable being clipped in. That's a valid observation, and I respect that. 2) you're buying all the kit to look like the "big boys". If that's your thing, that's fine too. I don't know why you choose to and I don't care. But you're inferring that I'm judging everybody against the gotta-have-the-gear standard. I'm not. That may be a factor, but it's not a deciding factor.
And the fact that so many of you have your panties in a wad over my opinion does speak to the issue all by itself. Take the advice that you find useful and ignore the rest. If you insist on things like "the data doesn't support". you're just being argumentative and contrary. And then you get pissy because because not everyone agrees with you, Feel free to ride the way you like, but don't come here and tell everyone else they're wrong. Some people enjoy the sport of debate for its own sake. I'm not one of them. I think you might be. |
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 22642523)
This is the most insightful thing you've said. If I rode like you ride, I wouldn't use clipless, either. If you rode like I ride, you wouldn't do so without clipless pedals, either.
Yet you insinuate that the majority of us are only buying in to hype, fashion and/or the emulation or pros. Seems awfully judgy to me. :foo: |
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642514)
...But the data is out there...
Originally Posted by Koyote
(Post 22642549)
And the data is actually quite mixed....
Originally Posted by VegasJen
(Post 22642647)
... The fact is the data doesn't support the efficiency argument....
Originally Posted by Bob Ross
(Post 22642671)
Some data doesn't support the efficiency argument, that's true.
If you're going to waste time arguing about personal preferences as if they're empirically derived, you could at least do it grammatically. /rant |
Originally Posted by genejockey
(Post 22642700)
Jesus, people! "Data" is the PLURAL!!!
...kidding. |
The word data is not a plural. There is one word. Geese is a single word for more than one goose. Mice is a single word for more than one mouse. Data is a single word for more than one datum.
The data themselves are plural. |
BTW, for the OP - as someone above said, you'd benefit from learning how and when to shift. Also, you might benefit from spending time and effort on bike set up and maintenance. With the derailleurs and shifters set up properly, and shifted properly, you shouldn't find yourself stalling out and dropping the chain, pedal type notwithstanding.
|
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
(Post 22642708)
The word data is not a plural. There is one word. Geese is a single word for more than one goose. Mice is a single word for more than one mouse. Data is a single word for more than one datum.
The data themselves are plural. |
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 22642705)
I believe you meant to post- data are the plural.
...kidding. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.