Originally Posted by adamrice
(Post 22073993)
I carry a couple of tubes, a boot, and a Dynaplug in case I get a puncture the sealant can't handle. |
A 50+ thread about going tubeless? This is about vasectomies, isn't it?
|
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
(Post 22074189)
A 50+ thread about going tubeless? This is about vasectomies, isn't it?
No, but some may have been vascetomized. |
Originally Posted by BCAC
(Post 22067377)
The bike is an Argon 18 Disc Di2 with carbon wheels and the original 25’s needed 125 psi. The bike isn’t designed for comfort, but my 67year body was fine with it. It really is much more comfortable with the 28’s at 80. I ride longer because I’m less tired and I think I might be a bit faster, It might say 125 on the tire sidewall, but that refers to the pressure it might blow off the rim. In other words, the maximum allowable pressure. Not the recommended riding pressure. If you weigh 350 lbs, including your bike/gear/clothes, Silca's respected calculator says to ride 98 front/100 rear psi. They don't offer calculations over 350 lbs I ride 85/89 on my Conti 25's w/latex tubes. I weigh 145. Bike 18. Plus 12 for gear/clothes/shoes https://silca.cc/pages/sppc-form?sub...6-619a2df01982 |
Originally Posted by PeteHski
(Post 22074125)
I do the same. It comes to the point eventually where you actually want to get a puncture just so you can feel it was worthwhile carrying that kit around! I'm still waiting to try my Dynaplug
https://us.muc-off.com/collections/n...-puncture-plug https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/13...615815082&2995 |
Originally Posted by Lazyass
(Post 22074873)
These replace your bar end plugs. Kind of cool. It even has a trimming knife.
https://us.muc-off.com/collections/n...-puncture-plug https://cdn-ctstaging.pressidium.com...lingtips-3.jpg |
Originally Posted by bfaIllini
(Post 22074706)
With all due respect, you don't "need" 125 psi unless you're a whale.
It might say 125 on the tire sidewall, but that refers to the pressure it might blow off the rim. In other words, the maximum allowable pressure. Not the recommended riding pressure. If you weigh 350 lbs, including your bike/gear/clothes, Silca's respected calculator says to ride 98 front/100 rear psi. They don't offer calculations over 350 lbs I ride 85/89 on my Conti 25's w/latex tubes. I weigh 145. Bike 18. Plus 12 for gear/clothes/shoes https://silca.cc/pages/sppc-form?sub...6-619a2df01982 Btw, the tires were great. Over 4,000 miles with one flat on a debris laden road after a strong storm. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...e04e07a91.jpeg |
Originally Posted by BCAC
(Post 22075011)
Thanks for your reply. In the case of Vittoria, on their website, they specifically recommend staying within the range printed on the side of the tire. And of course, a range of 100 - 130 by its nature, isn’t a “maximum allowable pressure”. I’m 6’ 3” / 200 lbs and chose to stay toward the higher end of recommended range. I’m sure I could have gone much lower, but chose to stay with the range recommended by both Vittoria and my lbs.
Btw, the tires were great. Over 4,000 miles with one flat on a debris laden road after a strong storm. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...e04e07a91.jpeg I apologize if I came off as a know it all. Whatever works for you is the best for sure. There is a definite acceptance now, even amongst pros, that softer is better, both for speed and comfort. Pinch flats are the concern of too low, but following the Silca pressure chart, which was designed with input from pro cyclists, probably protects you against those. Some more good reads: https://www.roadbikereview.com/threa...or-not.356627/ https://www.renehersecycles.com/myth...ure-is-faster/ Enjoy the riding! |
Originally Posted by bfaIllini
(Post 22075054)
Pinch flats are the concern of too low
|
Originally Posted by adamrice
(Post 22075061)
Which is one of the advantages of going tubeless: you don't need to worry about pinch flats.
|
Originally Posted by terrymorse
(Post 22069831)
What do you carry with you for roadside tubeless repair?
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycl...nner-tube.html https://www.bikeforums.net/general-c...-flat-kit.html |
I spent a year with tubelss (or maybe less, I can't remember exactly) before I quit...for me, they were way more trouble than they were worth. Maybe the ones I had were just crappy ones (they were Mavic, that came with a wheel set) but in that year i destroyed THREE of them.
The lower pressure was softer, but no big deal. Since I went back to tubes, I've never once thought of going tubless again. |
Originally Posted by Ogsarg
(Post 22067369)
I resisted tubeless for about 5 years and flatting 6-8 times a year. After a particularly bad period of several flats in a short time, I took the plunge. My wheels were tubeless ready so it was just a matter of getting the tires, valves, and sealant. Was a bit of a hassle to set the bead on the first try but i don't expect that to be much trouble going forward. I know from finding sealant on my seatpost, that I have prevented at least one roadside repair so far.
Just to be clear, I would not bother with tubeless if I was getting 1-2 flats a year or less. |
wow, and here i was all set and eager to go tubeless!
i’m riding on 700x32 conti gator hardshells, 50-80psi depending on the ride. 99% road riding. 195lb + 30lb bike and stuff. usually do 20-50 miles, speeds from 10-40, never so far from civilization that i couldn’t uber/lyft my way back from a total disaster, but i got the hardshells because a lot of my riding is through the city, the usual debris in the road, broken glass etc. no flats yet on this setup (about 1000 miles in), knock on wood. i was planning on going to some lighter, lower RR tires in the same size and setting them up tubeless... but this thread has me thinking it’s too much hassle. |
so if I use stans in my tubes do I need to replace it each year? I know it has plugged some leaks as the tube was stuck to the tire. a couple of times Once I had the wrong pump sealed the tube before I took the tire off when I got home.
|
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 22068789)
We're up to post 30. Need 20 more thoughts to pass 50 as is the title. <grin>
No tubeless for me - I do not flat that much. Kind of like disc brakes - I do not ride in muddy or wet conditions, and know how to use my rim brakes if I do get caught. So I don't see much need for either. |
Tubeless
On both bikes I put tubeless and replaced OEM wheels on my bianchi with i9 for tubeless. The ride is smooth (can operate at lower pressure if you want) and I've had a few punctures that have filled and allowed me to continue ride and get back home without problem. Peace of mind is one big factor. But I also find with current tires (Hutchinson Sector) I'm getting a very nice ride for long distances. Cons would include that they are slightly more challenging to change with the sealant. I'm sold on tubeless.
|
Originally Posted by Chinghis
(Post 22075710)
Yeah, I thought it was "50 thoughts". Ya know, like "50 Ways To Leave Your Lover."
No tubeless for me - I do not flat that much. Kind of like disc brakes - I do not ride in muddy or wet conditions, and know how to use my rim brakes if I do get caught. So I don't see much need for either. |
Originally Posted by BCAC
(Post 22075011)
Thanks for your reply. In the case of Vittoria, on their website, they specifically recommend staying within the range printed on the side of the tire. And of course, a range of 100 - 130 by its nature, isn’t a “maximum allowable pressure”. I’m 6’ 3” / 200 lbs and chose to stay toward the higher end of recommended range. I’m sure I could have gone much lower, but chose to stay with the range recommended by both Vittoria and my lbs.
Btw, the tires were great. Over 4,000 miles with one flat on a debris laden road after a strong storm. |
Originally Posted by terrymorse
(Post 22071223)
About the assertion that tubeless is better because of fewer flats:
1. Isn't that because everyone uses sealant in their tubeless tires? 2. Wouldn't using sealant in a tubed tire provide the same flat prevention benefit? So sealant in a tube probably provides slightly better flat prevention. Add to this, little mess normally, as the sealant is contained in the tube, and the ability to change the tire, while reusing the tube with sealant in it, instead of needing new sealant. |
Originally Posted by alo
(Post 22079073)
I don't have scientific proof, but my gut feeling is, there would be a small number of punctures that would seal in a tire and tube, but not in a tubeless tire. This is because the sealant would collect in the space between the tire and tube, forming the seal.
So sealant in a tube probably provides slightly better flat prevention. Add to this, little mess normally, as the sealant is contained in the tube, and the ability to change the tire, while reusing the tube with sealant in it, instead of needing new sealant. |
Originally Posted by PeteHski
(Post 22079320)
So do you run tubes with sealant?
I have small punctures which the sealant seals, approximately once a month, and large punctures that need to be patched, approximately once a year. To only need a puncture repair approximately once a year is a real benefit. With the amount of riding I have been doing recently, I wear out the back tire in a little over a year. The front tire lasts a little longer. So I am talking about one puncture repair in the life of the tire. The future is unknown. There is a possibility I might have a bad run, with a lot of large punctures in a short time. I know, different people ride in different environments, and have different numbers of punctures. |
Originally Posted by alo
(Post 22079704)
Yes.
I have small punctures which the sealant seals, approximately once a month, and large punctures that need to be patched, approximately once a year. To only need a puncture repair approximately once a year is a real benefit. With the amount of riding I have been doing recently, I wear out the back tire in a little over a year. The front tire lasts a little longer. So I am talking about one puncture repair in the life of the tire. The future is unknown. There is a possibility I might have a bad run, with a lot of large punctures in a short time. I know, different people ride in different environments, and have different numbers of punctures. One thing I’ve always liked about tubeless tyres is the ability to plug them from the outside if you do get a large puncture that the sealant can’t handle. I’ve only ever had to do that with mtb tyres when not running any sealant on Mavic UST rims. Much quicker than changing a tube. But since running sealant I’ve never had to plug any holes since. |
I will explain some more.
When doing this, you get small punctures which seal with sealant. When you do have a large puncture and need a puncture repair, you take the tube out and inflate it to see where the leak is. The tube stretches, and the small holes which have sealed with sealant leak. So instead of patching one just puncture, I have patched several of the larger punctures. I have left the very small ones to seal again with sealant. I replaced a tire recently and used the same tube. It took several days to stop leaking. Whenever I have that tube out again, I plan to patch the larger holes. |
Originally Posted by PeteHski
(Post 22079732)
Well since running road tubeless with sealant I haven’t had a single puncture in 18 months. The tubeless tyres I’m running are pretty tough though, so that does help a lot. I don’t think the sealant has had to do any work yet, other than seal around the tyre beads.
One thing I’ve always liked about tubeless tyres is the ability to plug them from the outside if you do get a large puncture that the sealant can’t handle. I’ve only ever had to do that with mtb tyres when not running any sealant on Mavic UST rims. Much quicker than changing a tube. But since running sealant I’ve never had to plug any holes since. Maybe you are in an area where there are few things to puncture tires. Maybe you have had more seal with sealant than you think. Where I am, there are several types of plants with sharp spikes on them. They are impossible to avoid, if you go where I go. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.