"downgrading" from electronic shifters
I have a '12 venge with ultegra di2 shifters on it, and I think I honestly prefer mechanical shifters.
Am I the only one in this situation? Is there an objective advantage to electronic shifters over mechanical? |
It's your bike, do as you like.
|
Originally Posted by Bikealangelo
(Post 23226353)
I have a '12 venge with ultegra di2 shifters on it, and I think I honestly prefer mechanical shifters.
Am I the only one in this situation? Is there an objective advantage to electronic shifters over mechanical? |
The advantage for Di2 is not having to adjust anything. In the four years I've had my bike, the only time it required adjustment was when I went into the settings and mucked it up before I really understood what those settings did.
With my mechanical shifting, I'd be adjusting them at least once a year to maintain the perfect shifting I like. And changing cables every 2 or 3 years. There are differences you'll experience with electronic shifting that are unique to it alone, but just things you have to get use too. I'm sure there were things I had to get use to with mechanical shifting too, but after most of a lifetime using them, I'd have to sit here most of the day to come up with what they are. If this Venge with Di2 is fairly new to you, then you probably just need to get use to it and get some experience. If you are new to cycling, you might not be as good with the mechanical either as you now imagine you are when comparing it to the Di2. I don't recommend converting the bike to mechanical. If you want mechanical, get a bike that has it already. |
Modern mechanical is good as it ever has been but on the other hand we are going into peak an electronic shifting era where battery, shifting speed, app control, price, and weight is drastically getting better. If you are coming from a later Venge yeah electronic shifting in practice hasn't changed, but IMO the positives of electronic shift vastly outweigh going back to mechanical unless the finances prohibited it.
|
Originally Posted by Bikealangelo
(Post 23226353)
I have a '12 venge with ultegra di2 shifters on it, and I think I honestly prefer mechanical shifters.
Am I the only one in this situation? Is there an objective advantage to electronic shifters over mechanical? ... and you're new to cycling and especially higher end bikes... short comment : I would give yourself time to really get to know the intricacies of 'electronic' shifting, become really familiar and then decide. Longer comment - running the needed cabling for mech shifting may bring up some issues... I'm staying with mech shifting... for all the decades of integrated shifting/braking systems, I've had very reliable shifting, and almost never had issues which caused me to interrupt a ride - couple times in the first decade of not paying attention to old cables which should have been replaced - but no issues in the last 25 ish yrs. I've now become a slave to ALL the recharge battery devices which for wwhich I need to concern myself about 'charge level'... Not a 'bike' thing, but very much a 'life' thing... ... given current trends of bike shifting technology and equipment available, I don't need or want what 12 speed systems have to offer... (to0 lengthy to go into here...) 11 speed seems to be the final frontier for mech shifting on road bikes. IF, I had a bike with E-shifting, I would prolly just deal with the battery issue, and just ride it... I will prolly end up with a higher level "road E-bike", as quite a few of my riding/ex-racer buddies have. They've integrated into the local group/peloton rides with the younger racers... I've had to stay out of many of those rides... At coffee stops, I'm constantly being 'campaigned' by my buds to 'Get an E-Bike!, and get back into the peloton"... so maybe give e-shifting some time... you might find a liking... Ride On Yuri The 'End' of the Ride is known, inevitable - but we get to choose the journey and how we get there... |
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 23226394)
The advantage for Di2 is not having to adjust anything. In the four years I've had my bike, the only time it required adjustment was when I went into the settings and mucked it up before I really understood what those settings did.
With my mechanical shifting, I'd be adjusting them at least once a year to maintain the perfect shifting I like. And changing cables every 2 or 3 years. There are differences you'll experience with electronic shifting that are unique to it alone, but just things you have to get use too. I'm sure there were things I had to get use to with mechanical shifting too, but after most of a lifetime using them, I'd have to sit here most of the day to come up with what they are. If this Venge with Di2 is fairly new to you, then you probably just need to get use to it and get some experience. If you are new to cycling, you might not be as good with the mechanical either as you now imagine you are when comparing it to the Di2. I don't recommend converting the bike to mechanical. If you want mechanical, get a bike that has it already. Thank you, this is the input that I was hoping for. I am fairly new to cycling (last year was really my first year cycling) so it would have taken a ton of time for me to notice the easier upkeep. |
Originally Posted by cyclezen
(Post 23226407)
so your thread title is "downgrading" from electronic shifters"
... and you're new to cycling and especially higher end bikes... short comment : I would give yourself time to really get to know the intricacies of 'electronic' shifting, become really familiar and then decide. Longer comment - running the needed cabling for mech shifting may bring up some issues... I'm staying with mech shifting... for all the decades of integrated shifting/braking systems, I've had very reliable shifting, and almost never had issues which caused me to interrupt a ride - couple times in the first decade of not paying attention to old cables which should have been replaced - but no issues in the last 25 ish yrs. I've now become a slave to ALL the recharge battery devices which for wwhich I need to concern myself about 'charge level'... Not a 'bike' thing, but very much a 'life' thing... ... given current trends of bike shifting technology and equipment available, I don't need or want what 12 speed systems have to offer... (to0 lengthy to go into here...) 11 speed seems to be the final frontier for mech shifting on road bikes. IF, I had a bike with E-shifting, I would prolly just deal with the battery issue, and just ride it... I will prolly end up with a higher level "road E-bike", as quite a few of my riding/ex-racer buddies have. They've integrated into the local group/peloton rides with the younger racers... I've had to stay out of many of those rides... At coffee stops, I'm constantly being 'campaigned' by my buds to 'Get an E-Bike!, and get back into the peloton"... so maybe give e-shifting some time... you might find a liking... Ride On Yuri The 'End' of the Ride is known, inevitable - but we get to choose the journey and how we get there... |
Originally Posted by Bikealangelo
(Post 23226445)
Fair points. I have put around 100 miles on it so far, which is a decent amount for me. I thought maybe that was long enough to tell, but it sounds like it isn't (and it also sounds like converting to mechanical is trickier than I thought it would be).
|
Originally Posted by PeteHski
(Post 23226456)
What are you not liking that motivates you enough to consider all the hassle of converting it to mechanical? I can certainly understand someone not wanting to convert from existing mechanical to electronic, but I've never heard of anyone doing the opposite unless moving to a different bike.
|
I prefer mechanical 11sp Dura Ace, and never went electric. (Although I rode it and liked it.)
In your case, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Switching to mechanical will cost you a fair amount. If I found myself in your shoes, I'd ride that old Di2 until it wore out. |
Originally Posted by Bikealangelo
(Post 23226445)
Fair points. I have put around 100 miles on it so far, which is a decent amount for me. I thought maybe that was long enough to tell, but it sounds like it isn't (and it also sounds like converting to mechanical is trickier than I thought it would be).
|
Originally Posted by alcjphil
(Post 23226478)
I do know someone who make that switch. He considers himself "old school" and when he bought a new bike a few years ago he had the bike converted from DI2 to mechanical shifting. He also scoffs at disc brakes and road tubeless tires. A lot of experienced older riders who buy new bikes nearing retirement age buy the bike they couldn't afford when they were younger
or was he just dead set against trying something different? I can fully understand not going to the expense and hassle of converting from mechanical to electronic, but it just seems nuts to rip off a brand new functioning Di2 groupset and replace it with mechanical. Not unless you were having serious issues. |
Originally Posted by PeteHski
(Post 23226503)
Did he actually ride it with Di2 and disliked it enough to go to the expense of converting to mechanical
or was he just dead set against trying something different? . |
Originally Posted by Bikealangelo
(Post 23226353)
Is there an objective advantage to electronic shifters over mechanical?
Bear in mind that whether it's a 'downgrade' or not, converting from electronic to mechanical shifting will require new shift levers and new derailleur(s). It'll be costly. |
Originally Posted by alcjphil
(Post 23226478)
A lot of experienced older riders who buy new bikes nearing retirement age buy the bike they couldn't afford when they were younger
|
It's not always easy to find parts for older Di2. If something expensive wears out, it might make sense to switch to mechanical shifting rather than spring for current Di2. Otherwise, enjoy it! :thumb:
|
12sp mechanical seems like it would be really sensitive to small adjustments and need a lot of fussing to keep in perfect shifting condition.
|
The principals of bicycle shifting were perfected a very long time ago.
Whenever a technology has reached it's peak of ingenuity, people invent gimmicks instead of actually innovating. Granted, manufacturers have to eat too, but at some point we must insist on actual, revolutionary technology improvements and refuse these incremental, minor upgrades that come around once a year to drain our pockets. Same goes for phones, laptops and computer hardware as a whole. |
Originally Posted by Koyote
(Post 23226545)
That's a bit sad.
|
Originally Posted by 2muchroad
(Post 23226628)
The principals of bicycle shifting were perfected a very long time ago.
Whenever a technology has reached it's peak of ingenuity, people invent gimmicks instead of actually innovating. Granted, manufacturers have to eat too, but at some point we must insist on actual, revolutionary technology improvements and refuse these incremental, minor upgrades that come around once a year to drain our pockets. Same goes for phones, laptops and computer hardware as a whole. |
Originally Posted by 2muchroad
(Post 23226628)
The principals of bicycle shifting were perfected a very long time ago.
Whenever a technology has reached it's peak of ingenuity, people invent gimmicks instead of actually innovating. Granted, manufacturers have to eat too, but at some point we must insist on actual, revolutionary technology improvements and refuse these incremental, minor upgrades that come around once a year to drain our pockets. Same goes for phones, laptops and computer hardware as a whole. Phones might get updated more often, but you can skip a few generations and they certainly improve. Try going back to an original iPhone or Blackberry and see how that compares. |
Originally Posted by PeteHski
(Post 23226709)
Nobody is forcing you to buy new stuff every year.
The point is that R&D resources should be utilized for technological innovation, not the unnecessary and repeated refinements of an already complete technology, in this case electronic shifters. The reason for this isn't ingenuity or technological progress, but corporate greed. Finding another reason to charge exorbitant sums for that next best thing. Of course you don't have to buy it, but that's not stopping the market from being manipulated in this manner. |
Originally Posted by 2muchroad
(Post 23226628)
The principals of bicycle shifting were perfected a very long time ago.
Whenever a technology has reached it's peak of ingenuity, people invent gimmicks instead of actually innovating. Granted, manufacturers have to eat too, but at some point we must insist on actual, revolutionary technology improvements and refuse these incremental, minor upgrades that come around once a year to drain our pockets. Same goes for phones, laptops and computer hardware as a whole. |
Originally Posted by alcjphil
(Post 23226478)
A lot of experienced older riders who buy new bikes nearing retirement age buy the bike they couldn't afford when they were younger
Originally Posted by Koyote
(Post 23226545)
That's a bit sad.
Originally Posted by big john
(Post 23226647)
Why do you say that?
Originally Posted by big john
(Post 23226647)
Now that I'm retired I wish I had bought some new bikes before I stopped working. Budget is very tight now. I could still spring for one but it would come out of savings. More sad.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:18 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.