Bit thrown off by my first road bike - is this too small?
Hey all! So I got my first road bike, but I'm a bit thrown off by the handlebars being lower than the saddle (which I need to raise 1-2 inches). I understand this is for a more aero position but I've always ridden upright so it's definitely new. Based on the below picture, would you say this bike is my size or too small? I'm just short of 5'7, bike tires are 27''. Are there any other pictures that would help determine fit? Thank you!
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...72f1ee9a38.jpg |
Judging by the height of your saddle, the bike may be too big for you or you have it in the wrong position. Check YouTube for quite a few how-to's on how to adjust your saddle. On the lowest point of your pedal stroke, that leg should only be slightly bent.
|
If that position is too low for you then, I'd think you don't really want a road bike. Road bikes are made for longer endurance riding. From 0 miles to 200 miles and more. If you aren't going to be riding but 20 miles or so, you might prefer a cruiser or hybrid or something else. They can be ridden on the road too.
|
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 21959774)
If that position is too low for you then, I'd think you don't really want a road bike. Road bikes are made for longer endurance riding. From 0 miles to 200 miles and more. If you aren't going to be riding but 20 miles or so, you might prefer a cruiser or hybrid or something else. They can be ridden on the road too.
|
If your bike is the wrong size for you or poorly fitted to you then what you are feeling might be more so because of it being ill fitted. I tended to want to be more upright on old style road bikes that were too big for me. As I got the frame size more appropriate to my size, then I wanted to be more and more aero.
|
That looks like a 21"/54 CM frame. I ride a frame that size at 5' 7" with legs that are on the short side for my height. Yeah, 'bars are generally lower than saddles on road bikes. Was that a surprise? Some stems allow more height; some less. The star in tall stems is the Nitto Technomic. I have a couple of them - but, when I ride myself into decent shape, I wish I could get me 'bars lower, and the Technomic won't allow it. I could go to a different stem, but that's a giant PITA, IMO, so I just bend my elbows more. My reco is to get your seat height right and see if you get used to the 'bars as they are.
I agree that the seat height may need to be raised. If you're lucky, your knees will hurt when the seat height is too high or too low. If you do feel pain, the location will tell you which way to move the seat. A road bike is different from a hybrid. You have to give yourself some time and some miles. You might like it a lot - but you won't know without riding it. The seat meets some definition of 'saddle'. I'll call it a saddle when it sits in a saddle post that fits into a saddle tube.... |
Originally Posted by philbob57
(Post 21959906)
That looks like a 21"/54 CM frame. I ride a frame that size at 5' 7" with legs that are on the short side for my height. Yeah, 'bars are generally lower than saddles on road bikes. Was that a surprise? Some stems allow more height; some less. The star in tall stems is the Nitto Technomic. I have a couple of them - but, when I ride myself into decent shape, I wish I could get me 'bars lower, and the Technomic won't allow it. I could go to a different stem, but that's a giant PITA, IMO, so I just bend my elbows more. My reco is to get your seat height right and see if you get used to the 'bars as they are.
I agree that the seat height may need to be raised. If you're lucky, your knees will hurt when the seat height is too high or too low. If you do feel pain, the location will tell you which way to move the seat. A road bike is different from a hybrid. You have to give yourself some time and some miles. You might like it a lot - but you won't know without riding it. The seat meets some definition of 'saddle'. I'll call it a saddle when it sits in a saddle post that fits into a saddle tube.... Odd question - I've heard most bikers utilize the grip in the "hoods" - near the top of the brake. What's the consensus about doing that on more vintage bikes like these? The wire obviously being a concern, and not sure if this bike is meant to have that level of stress on the brake mechanism. |
The advantage of the dropped bars is that you can move your hands around - tops, drops, ramps, hoods.You can't do much of an emergency stop from more than 12-15 MPH from the hoods; most people use the brakes from the drops. C & V (Classic and Vintage) levers are harder to control from the hoods than brifters and other modern levers. (Here's an outline for new bikes with 'brifters': https://lovelybike.blogspot.com/2012...roduction.html.) Also, don't count on the extenders to do more than slow you down and stop very slowly.
There's a C&V forum here. French bikes like your Moto are pretty well thought of and pretty well-known. Fit for diamond-frame bikes like yours is different from contemporary bikes. You might get better advice there. Good luck with the bike. I ride with someone who can buy a new bike but loves her basic Moto, and yours is a step or 2 up from hers. |
That looks like a very nice bike, well set up and beautifully cared for. My bike fitting primer is here:
https://www.bikeforums.net/21296948-post3.html Going through that process should tell you whether or not the bike is the right size. When you finish the fitting process and have ridden it a few miles to make sure you got it about right, post a couple photos of you on the bike. You'll have to use a stand or lean against something: 1) Hands in the drops, balls of feet on the pedals, elbows slightly bent, cranks vertical. 2) Cranks horizontal, hands deep in the drops, elbows bent to almost 90° |
And make certain that helmet goes on your head and doesn't stay hung on the handle bars.
You wouldn't believe how many I see cycling the MUP here with their helmets hanging on the bars. I guess they plan to put them on just before they have an accident. When you get to be a full fledged addicted to cycling cyclist you will want your pictures in full cycling kit and that includes helmet on head, wheels oriented with valve stems on bottom, picture taken from the drive side with it's crank forward and a few other things..... <grin> |
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 21960711)
And make certain that helmet goes on your head and doesn't stay hung on the handle bars.
You wouldn't believe how many I see cycling the MUP here with their helmets hanging on the bars. I guess they plan to put them on just before they have an accident. When you get to be a full fledged addicted to cycling cyclist you will want your pictures in full cycling kit and that includes helmet on head, wheels oriented with valve stems on bottom, picture taken from the drive side with it's crank forward and a few other things..... <grin> |
Helmets - the CPSC has set standards that all helmets sold in the US must meet. They're far from perfect, but they're what we have. It has been asserted on these pages that the more expensive helmets may provide less protection than cheaper ones, because they're lighter and may be closer to the CPSC minima. MIPS and Wavecell are attempts to make better ones, but who knows? I chose a helmet base on VPI's ratings: https://www.helmet.beam.vt.edu/bicyc...t-ratings.html.
If I fall and hit my head, I just hope the fall matches the test conditions. That's 'hope', not 'expect'.:twitchy: BTW, your photo shows that the valve stems of the tubes are skewed; they should point directly to the center of the hub. That's not an esthetic issue. The skewing stresses the valve stems and reportedly can lead to premature failure. This might help you fix it yourself : Not so BTW, I can't tell whether your rims are steel or aluminum. If they're steel, be VERY careful around moisture, mist, rain. Steel rims do not stop at all well. when wet. If they're steel, consider buying some wheels with aluminum rims sooner rather than later. In fact, buy aluminum rimmed wheels very soon, if your budget allows. Of course, for decades there were no aluminum rims, and for additional decades, they were pretty expensive. I rode for several years on steel, as did almost everybody else. Anyway, if it's wet, giove yourself lots of space for braking with steel rims. |
Originally Posted by philbob57
(Post 21961476)
Helmets - the CPSC has set standards that all helmets sold in the US must meet. They're far from perfect, but they're what we have. It has been asserted on these pages that the more expensive helmets may provide less protection than cheaper ones, because they're lighter and may be closer to the CPSC minima. MIPS and Wavecell are attempts to make better ones, but who knows? I chose a helmet base on VPI's ratings: https://www.helmet.beam.vt.edu/bicyc...t-ratings.html.
If I fall and hit my head, I just hope the fall matches the test conditions. That's 'hope', not 'expect'.:twitchy: BTW, your photo shows that the valve stems of the tubes are skewed; they should point directly to the center of the hub. That's not an esthetic issue. The skewing stresses the valve stems and reportedly can lead to premature failure. This might help you fix it yourself : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE2xdvhAYCE. I think you can do it simply by deflating the tube. I've never had to take out the mechanism, but I've only had the problem with Presta valves. Not so BTW, I can't tell whether your rims are steel or aluminum. If they're steel, be VERY careful around moisture, mist, rain. Steel rims do not stop at all well. when wet. If they're steel, consider buying some wheels with aluminum rims sooner rather than later. In fact, buy aluminum rimmed wheels very soon, if your budget allows. Of course, for decades there were no aluminum rims, and for additional decades, they were pretty expensive. I rode for several years on steel, as did almost everybody else. Anyway, if it's wet, giove yourself lots of space for braking with steel rims. I think those rims are aluminum... is there a good way to tell? Here's two pictures of the tires below (pre-tuneup) if that helps determine what type they are. But noted! https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...ed0b138e51.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...a07ee96954.jpg |
Originally Posted by kolt54321
(Post 21962597)
I think those rims are aluminum... is there a good way to tell?
The fancy scientific test is to use a magnet. |
You really need to decide what you are wanting. This bike will quickly have you spending more money upgrading things than it's worth. And depending on what you are wanting, it might not ever be able to do that thing well.
If you don't see yourself ever wanting to routinely ride 20 mph or even 16 mph. And you aren't going to ride for much more than an hour at a time, then consider something like this so you can have a comfortable upright position.. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...b43925dee.jpeg https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/b...lorCode=bronze brand new, inexpensive and made for persons that don't like the typical position a road bike (endurance bike) is made for. |
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 21962850)
You really need to decide what you are wanting. This bike will quickly have you spending more money upgrading things than it's worth. And depending on what you are wanting, it might not ever be able to do that thing well.
If you don't see yourself ever wanting to routinely ride 20 mph or even 16 mph. And you aren't going to ride for much more than an hour at a time, then consider something like this so you can have a comfortable upright position.. https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/b...lorCode=bronze brand new, inexpensive and made for persons that don't like the typical position a road bike (endurance bike) is made for. I remember from my last weekly 25 mile ride (when the weather supported it) I was doing 11mph on the Trek most of the time, max 19mph, but it was no race, and on certain (non highway) stretches I would definitely have liked to go faster. |
Alright, but don't name your bike. That makes some folks too emotionally attached and they want to throw big bucks at stuff to "save" it from the scrap yard. <grin>
I just look at throwing old bikes in the scrapyard as re-cycling. It'll get back to me some day in some other form. |
I don't know how these threads get so weird. It's a perfectly good bike, better than bikes I've ridden doubles on. Get it all adjusted like I mentioned above in post 9, and take a picture of you on bike.
|
Originally Posted by kolt54321
(Post 21959932)
Thank you! Basically that height as well so good to know I'm not doing it "wrong". 21'' sounds about right, I don't think it's a 19''. I was surprised actually! I knew that road bike riders typically were in a lower position, but being so "forward" in that position myself felt fairly scary the first time today. Definitely will be trying it out more on dedicated bike paths vs on the road.
Odd question - I've heard most bikers utilize the grip in the "hoods" - near the top of the brake. What's the consensus about doing that on more vintage bikes like these? The wire obviously being a concern, and not sure if this bike is meant to have that level of stress on the brake mechanism. I love my new bike so I'm going to be spending some time on it to adjust, but good luck and let me know if you find any tips/tricks :) |
I’m surprised no one asked whether you can clear the top tube standing flat-footed - from the pic it looks doubtful. Isn’t that one method of determining whether or not a bike frame size is in the ballpark?
|
That bike has some beautiful geometry. I love the way the fork angles forward, essentially making it much more stable. I would wager money that it's a 60cm frame and might be a tad large for your build, but adjust it as best you can for yourself and your body will more than likely adapt to it with riding. Good luck and enjoy,
|
Originally Posted by Bigbus
(Post 22064516)
That bike has some beautiful geometry. I love the way the fork angles forward, essentially making it much more stable. I would wager money that it's a 60cm frame and might be a tad large for your build, but adjust it as best you can for yourself and your body will more than likely adapt to it with riding. Good luck and enjoy,
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...cb18dbc28c.jpg |
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
(Post 22064523)
60 Frame. Me 6FT
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...cb18dbc28c.jpg |
Originally Posted by Bigbus
(Post 22064897)
Hey Fred, nice bike. I'm guessing it has 700c wheels? You make it look small. When was the last time you measured yourself? haha
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.