Would you consider a Specialized Roubaix Sport to lean towards the endurance end?
Through no fault of my own, my late model Canoondale Synapse 105 was totaled in an accident. Luckily I came out relatively unscathed. This is considered an endurance bike and I rode it with 700x32 tires. I'm still in good shape but at 58 years old and most rides capping out at about 30 miles, averaging 15 mph, The bike was a pretty good fit for me for someone that still wants a road bike experience but giving up ultimate speed and handing for some comfort. A new one cost $1900 and I got enough insurance money to cover it but of course none available and local bike shop said I could order one and wait a year.
Looking at other online offerings at local shops and as you know, pickings are slim but I see one carried a Specialized Roubaix Sport in my size. At $3200 this is a big step up in price which I would have to consider if I really wanted to spend that much but of course it's a better bike with a carbon frame and hydraulic disk brakes. It also comes with some sort of shock absorbing stem. Good news too is it comes with 700x28 tires and it looks like hopefully the 700x32's might fit. Anybody have experience with this bike? Does it lean towards being more a strictly tight handling road bike or would one consider the specs relaxed enough to put it towards the endurance type end? Another option is to ride out the year with my 20 year old tried and true Trek 7500 hybrid and see if new and used bike inventory looks more promising in the spring. Think bike inventory will have picked up by then? |
If it fits and you can actually find one to test ride, it's a nice bike. I know 2 people that ride with this suspension, like it and have had no issues with it.
|
Originally Posted by geepondy
(Post 22199102)
Through no fault of my own, my late model Canoondale Synapse 105 was totaled in an accident. Luckily I came out relatively unscathed. This is considered an endurance bike and I rode it with 700x32 tires. I'm still in good shape but at 58 years old and most rides capping out at about 30 miles, averaging 15 mph, The bike was a pretty good fit for me for someone that still wants a road bike experience but giving up ultimate speed and handing for some comfort. A new one cost $1900 and I got enough insurance money to cover it but of course none available and local bike shop said I could order one and wait a year.
Looking at other online offerings at local shops and as you know, pickings are slim but I see one carried a Specialized Roubaix Sport in my size. At $3200 this is a big step up in price which I would have to consider if I really wanted to spend that much but of course it's a better bike with a carbon frame and hydraulic disk brakes. It also comes with some sort of shock absorbing stem. Good news too is it comes with 700x28 tires and it looks like hopefully the 700x32's might fit. Anybody have experience with this bike? Does it lean towards being more a strictly tight handling road bike or would one consider the specs relaxed enough to put it towards the endurance type end? Another option is to ride out the year with my 20 year old tried and true Trek 7500 hybrid and see if new and used bike inventory looks more promising in the spring. Think bike inventory will have picked up by then? |
If you get on with the front spring and the fit is good then it could be ideal. It's definitely an endurance bike in a similar vein to your Synapse.
|
It's definitely an endurance bike and should fit 32's. I built one up recently for riding fondos since the other bike is a SuperSix; I end up feeling a bit beaten up after long rides.
Overall the Roubaix is more stable in handling and comfortable, particularly while descending. You don't really notice the Future Shock working unless you're out of the saddle and putting in the watts. The Roubaix isn't a race bike so it lacks the snap in acceleration however it holds speed well and is noticeably less taxing after a long day. |
Would you consider a Specialized Roubaix Sport to lean towards the endurance end? Most everything we call road bikes are endurance bikes. It's only the desired fit that changes. Just because you don't want what is considered a race fit doesn't make them any more or less endurance bikes. |
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 22199764)
Toward the Endurance end? It's an endurance bike just like my Tarmac is. However the Roubaix is less aggressive geometry that will give you more of the relaxed, more upright position that your Cannondale did.
Most everything we call road bikes are endurance bikes. It's only the desired fit that changes. Just because you don't want what is considered a race fit doesn't make them any more or less endurance bikes. |
I have what I recall is a Roubaix Elite? It's a 2013-ish model with the Zertz fittings. It has been tremendously comfortable and I compare it to a Cadillac in regard to the other road bikes I have owned and ridden. Great bikes IMO.
|
Definitely worth considering and test riding. Just rode back-to-back 200 kms last weekend on my 2019 Roubaix with Ultegra Di2 on 25mm tubeless tires with only tired legs at the end.
|
Originally Posted by PeteHski
(Post 22199827)
Well the whole point of an endurance bike is the slightly less aggressive geometry. The Roubaix has a much higher stack than your Tarnac, but the rest of the geometry is fairly race oriented. Obviously it has more vertical compliance too for improved comfort. The pros do actually race this bike, but they have a special version with a lower stack height.
BITD I was told that a road bike was an endurance bike and just like color, you picked whether you wanted one with a relaxed fit or a race fit. When mfrs on their websites show less aggressive fit bikes as endurance bikes, it's not because they are the one and only bikes that are endurance. It's more that there is nothing else special about them. And I'm not saying that as a bad thing. It's just that they are the most basic of the endurance geometry bikes |
Geometry-wise, it's definitely on the Endurance end. That said, definitely test ride it. I rented a Roubaix Comp Di2 back in 2019, and it wasn't really the bike for me - ambivalent about the disc brakes, not used to the Di2, but really, really, disliked bobbing up and down on the suspension stem. I'm sure if I had more than a day with it, I would've been able to adjust my pedal stroke to be more compatible, but not so much with one 40 miler.
But if the bike shop says its available, go test ride it and let us know what you think! |
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 22199870)
So those that ride road bikes for hours and many miles on end with a low stack in a more aero position aren't on a endurance geometry bikes?
|
Originally Posted by yarbrough462
(Post 22200305)
No...
|
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 22200312)
But you aren't able to give any reasoning and justification. Just that like others I would have to blindly accept that you actually know anything.
|
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 22199870)
So those that ride road bikes for hours and many miles on end with a low stack in a more aero position aren't on a endurance geometry bikes?
If you ride your Tarmac in a triathon, is it a tri bike? If you ride your Tarmac on single track, is it a mountain bike? etc... |
Iride01 has been peddling the same 'all bikes are endurance bikes' BS since he purchased his Tarmac. I just laugh and don't bother responding to his ridiculous generalization any more. By the way, it doesn't help to reason with him, provide geometry charts, etc. to point out the differences-- he just continues with his ridiculous assertions regarding road frame geometry.
Hopefully the OP, and others who have asked about endurance geometry, see right through his ridiculous logic straight away also. Unfortunately for BF, he seems to have a lot of time on his hands to post about things he knows little about. |
Thanks for the sage advice thus far. Another issue is the frame size. The available bike is 54cm and at 5'10", I think 56cm is more suitable. My friend said you can compensate for frame differences somewhat by changing the stem, etc.
|
Originally Posted by Iride01
(Post 22199870)
When mfrs on their websites show less aggressive fit bikes as endurance bikes, it's not because they are the one and only bikes that are endurance. It's more that there is nothing else special about them. And I'm not saying that as a bad thing. It's just that they are the most basic of the endurance geometry bikes
|
Originally Posted by geepondy
(Post 22200429)
Thanks for the sage advice thus far. Another issue is the frame size. The available bike is 54cm and at 5'10", I think 56cm is more suitable. My friend said you can compensate for frame differences somewhat by changing the stem, etc.
|
Originally Posted by geepondy
(Post 22200429)
Thanks for the sage advice thus far. Another issue is the frame size. The available bike is 54cm and at 5'10", I think 56cm is more suitable. My friend said you can compensate for frame differences somewhat by changing the stem, etc.
Geometry Geeks |
I have a 56cm Roubaix (2013, pre- future shock) and a 32" pants inseam (height is 5'10"+). Don't think I'd fit on a 54cm bike.
It came with 25s, and I run it with 28s. Would like to go with 30s or 32s, but can't. Still, I like my bike a lot, and never feel bike envy. |
I'd been riding a 2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite Triple for many years before I finally took delivery this year of a 2021 Roubaix Sport. It's a terrific bike. The FutureShock stem is wonderful and the entire ride is just what I wanted. Like you, I ride a hilly 20-mile course at average 15 mph. I'm more interested in overall comfort than razor handling so I was looking for the endurance rider design.
My thoughts on the Roubaix Sport: https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycl...ths-delay.html My only concern for you is the frame size. I'm your cohort (age and height, I'm a little taller and a little older). The Roubaix Elite I used to ride was a 56 and since I got the Sport in a 58 frame size, I realize that at 6-foot-1 I was really a 58 all along. So the 54 might possibly be small for you at 5-foot-11. I would guess you're a 56. Don't let the simple availability of the bike in 54 sway you - it's an expensive bike and you need to get it in your size. It's worth waiting for. It only took me 9 months to receive mine in the correct size ... see thread at https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycl...ew-normal.html ... but the Roubaix Sport was worth every day of the wait. =K |
Originally Posted by DBT
(Post 22200642)
I am about the same height as you (5' 11"). I think we roughly straddle the 2 sizes. I purchased a 54 Roubaix in 2013 and have ridden it many miles. Yesterday, I took delivery of a 56 Aethos. I'm still dialing in the fit, but it feels good so far. I only have about 10 miles on it so far. Plan to stretch it legs this weekend.
Your 56 Aethos has about the same amount of stack as your 54 Roubaix (565mm vs 563mm) but a lot more reach (395mm vs 380mm). At 392mm, even my 58 Roubaix (2020 model) (for reference I'm 6' and have a 36" cycling inseam) has a shorter reach than your 56 Aethos. |
Originally Posted by aliasfox
(Post 22200035)
I rented a Roubaix Comp Di2 back in 2019, and it wasn't really the bike for me - ambivalent about the disc brakes, not used to the Di2, but really, really, disliked bobbing up and down on the suspension stem.
|
Originally Posted by geepondy
(Post 22200429)
Thanks for the sage advice thus far. Another issue is the frame size. The available bike is 54cm and at 5'10", I think 56cm is more suitable. My friend said you can compensate for frame differences somewhat by changing the stem, etc.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.