![]() |
Originally Posted by JaccoW
(Post 21772138)
Excellent point, though for the UK I would suggest this eBay seller. However good the BikeSmithDesign cotter press might be. That's a $100+ tool by the time it arrives in the UK.
|
Originally Posted by Monzeglio
(Post 21772195)
Another good tip, Salubrious, thank you. Looks like a pretty simple tool - similar to a small car ball-joint separator. I can imagine it saves a lot of trouble and potential hammer damage!
|
Originally Posted by Salubrious
(Post 21772089)
To check the bottom bracket you'll need a cotter pin press to to remove the crank arms. Don't use a hammer!! The pins are re-usable, and if you have a cotter press You'll find the crank arms easier to remove and install (the nuts are only used to hold the pins in place) than alloy square taper cranks. This press works a treat:
New Crank Cotter Press |
Originally Posted by Rherdegen
(Post 21772530)
beating the heck out of the cotter pin, deforming it in the process, then replacing it
|
Originally Posted by Rherdegen
(Post 21772530)
I’m embarrassed to admit that I never know such a tool existed. Thank you for the heads-up. Of course, it is rather pricey. Is there an alternative to this that doesn’t involve beating the heck out of the cotter pin, deforming it in the process, then replacing it?
And like @albrt already said, a vice with a socket wrench underneath the head of the pin is the other method. |
Originally Posted by Rherdegen
(Post 21772530)
I’m embarrassed to admit that I never know such a tool existed. Thank you for the heads-up. Of course, it is rather pricey. Is there an alternative to this that doesn’t involve beating the heck out of the cotter pin, deforming it in the process, then replacing it?
Unless you are comfortable finding a new cotter pin of the same shape, angle and hardness, DO NOT use a hammer no matter what. People on this thread have cobbled together a press using C-clamps and a bit of ingenuity to good effect- you'll have to search this thread. FWIW the only way the cotter pin ever gets deformed is because of improper removal. If deformed it would be very tricky to re-install! |
Excellent counsel, Salubrious!
|
I've been offering up a G-clamp I have with a socket and I think I should be able to make a Heath Robinson attempt at pressing out the cotter pins on the Superbe's cranks. I'll let you know how I get on!
|
I would add that if you remove the cotters with no damage, label them "R" and "L". It is one little bit of insurance that your crank arms 180 degrees opposed when reinstalled.
|
How sensible! I’ll prepare my Sharpie.
|
Originally Posted by Salubrious
(Post 21773406)
Unless you are comfortable finding a new cotter pin of the same shape, angle and hardness, DO NOT use a hammer no matter what. People on this thread have cobbled together a press using C-clamps and a bit of ingenuity to good effect- you'll have to search this thread. FWIW the only way the cotter pin ever gets deformed is because of improper removal. If deformed it would be very tricky to re-install!
https://bikesmithdesign.com/CotterPress/cotters.html |
I was on the Superbe today and the ride has definitely improved with the headset lubed and the saddle height raised a little. Swooping through a sequence of corners it held its line very nicely and it’s pulling up faster when I squeeze on the rod brakes. I can detect some modulation through the front brake though, which means the braking surface is probably ‘out of round’ over a small section - I can detect a very slight variation in the rim.
Is this common and does anyone have a suggestion of the best way to sort it out? I’m hoping it might be adjusted by a truing-type exercise. |
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...289eda289.jpeg
I can now post images, so here’s the bottom race of the ‘82 Raleigh Superbe’s headset with the full complement of 25 ball bearings, as recommended by Sheldon Brown. I used Park Tool grease which stuck the bearings in place nicely while I slid the fork back into the frame. |
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...09e6a7213.jpeg
Here’s the ‘82 Superbe before I cleaned it up. Very original, nothing has been replaced from new as far as I can tell, including the tyres. It even has the remnants of its ‘inspected’ paper sticker on the stem. I’m already quite fond of the tartan rear carrier... |
Originally Posted by Monzeglio
(Post 21774934)
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...09e6a7213.jpeg
Here’s the ‘82 Superbe before I cleaned it up. Very original, nothing has been replaced from new as far as I can tell, including the tyres. It even has the remnants of its ‘inspected’ paper sticker on the stem. I’m already quite fond of the tartan rear carrier... |
FYI, @Monzeglio, that particular Superbe may differ in some specifications from the typical Raleigh Sports or Superbe as is often mentioned here on the forum.
I don't know much about these - other than they're UK-market only - but they have a different (and slightly nicer) frame than the typical Sports, if a bit lacking in the traditional details one expects. The dropouts are different (I've never seen one close enough to figure out if they're the same stamped steel dropout in the fashion of the older Super Course), the lugs are generic cast (?) pieces, and the stays have spoon caps. The fenders are different than the norm as well, and the crankarms also appear different. I've always assumed these came from Japan, but that's obviously a classic Nottingham headset. Would love to see more closeups of the details. -Kurt |
Scandinavian market, probably Danish. I toured Denmark for a month in '93 and saw many similar models.
Downtown. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...1a53fa1d9a.jpg |
I'm liking the light blue thing to the left. It's not lugged, but it has a good look.
-Kurt |
You're a sucker for precious, shiny objects Kurt. ;)
Agree. |
Mongrel Lenton
I am posting pictures of the crankset cleaned up. Does anyone have any idea about it. It seems like it was made by Williams. It has Williams chainring square head bolts. It is designed for 1/8th chain.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...3c67bf888.jpeg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...825c92961.jpeg |
Anybody in need of a really big frame? :P
Originally Posted by JaccoW
(Post 21777859)
EMPO 3-speed bike - Big frame (75cm / 29 inches) €295 in The Hague, the NetherlandsMarktplaatshttp://i.imgur.com/KtUWupw.jpg |
Originally Posted by JaccoW
(Post 21777863)
Anybody in need of a really big frame? :P
|
Originally Posted by bluesteak
(Post 21777087)
I am posting pictures of the crankset cleaned up. Does anyone have any idea about it. It seems like it was made by Williams. It has Williams chainring square head bolts. It is designed for 1/8th chain.
|
Is the “P” on the inside of left crankarm a date code?
|
Originally Posted by bluesteak
(Post 21778547)
Is the “P” on the inside of left crankarm a date code?
|
Tube information and recommendation
Once again, I come to members of this forum for help and advice. I’m in the final steps of a refurb of my ‘51 Raleigh Superbe Sports Touring, a bike which hasn’t seen the light of day in probably 30 years, and which I’ve had in pieces for pretty much that whole time. My plan was to put on new tubes and tires due to age of ones it came with. And I figured I could just use new tubes with Schraeder valves instead of the old tubes with a woods/Dunlop valves as I believed other people had done in similar refurb projects. No dice. The holes in the old rims are just a bit too small to accommodate the Schraeder valves on the domestic tubes I bought. So...is there a brand of domestic US tube with a Schraeder valve that is small enough to get through the hole in the rim of a ‘51 Raleigh? Or, do I just need to bite the bullet and get tubes with Woods valves? And if the latter, does anyone have a recommended domestic source of tubes with Woods valves, or do I need to get them from an overseas source (and pay a bunch extra for shipping)? My main reason for wanting the Schraeder valve tubes is that everything else I own (well, almost everything) has Schraeder, and a domestic source really for speed of getting them and saving on shipping.
Oh, and it is a 26 x 1 3/8” tube/tire. I’m grateful for any advice you have! |
Mongrel lenton
I couldn’t access your link but 1930 seems to old. The mounting holes in the chain ring are on 4” centers. I have seen similar herons on double chain ring cranks from around 1960. I will attach a couple more photos. Who made them and when may remain a mystery.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...61bdf195e.jpeg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...e0e5a2429.jpeg |
Originally Posted by Rherdegen
(Post 21779480)
Once again, I come to members of this forum for help and advice. I’m in the final steps of a refurb of my ‘51 Raleigh Superbe Sports Touring, a bike which hasn’t seen the light of day in probably 30 years, and which I’ve had in pieces for pretty much that whole time. My plan was to put on new tubes and tires due to age of ones it came with. And I figured I could just use new tubes with Schraeder valves instead of the old tubes with a woods/Dunlop valves as I believed other people had done in similar refurb projects. No dice. The holes in the old rims are just a bit too small to accommodate the Schraeder valves on the domestic tubes I bought. So...is there a brand of domestic US tube with a Schraeder valve that is small enough to get through the hole in the rim of a ‘51 Raleigh? Or, do I just need to bite the bullet and get tubes with Woods valves? And if the latter, does anyone have a recommended domestic source of tubes with Woods valves, or do I need to get them from an overseas source (and pay a bunch extra for shipping)? My main reason for wanting the Schraeder valve tubes is that everything else I own (well, almost everything) has Schraeder, and a domestic source really for speed of getting them and saving on shipping.
Oh, and it is a 26 x 1 3/8” tube/tire. I’m grateful for any advice you have! Can you not just ream out the hole on the rim a bit? |
Originally Posted by Rherdegen
(Post 21779480)
Once again, I come to members of this forum for help and advice. I’m in the final steps of a refurb of my ‘51 Raleigh Superbe Sports Touring, a bike which hasn’t seen the light of day in probably 30 years, and which I’ve had in pieces for pretty much that whole time. My plan was to put on new tubes and tires due to age of ones it came with. And I figured I could just use new tubes with Schraeder valves instead of the old tubes with a woods/Dunlop valves as I believed other people had done in similar refurb projects. No dice. The holes in the old rims are just a bit too small to accommodate the Schraeder valves on the domestic tubes I bought. So...is there a brand of domestic US tube with a Schraeder valve that is small enough to get through the hole in the rim of a ‘51 Raleigh? Or, do I just need to bite the bullet and get tubes with Woods valves? And if the latter, does anyone have a recommended domestic source of tubes with Woods valves, or do I need to get them from an overseas source (and pay a bunch extra for shipping)? My main reason for wanting the Schraeder valve tubes is that everything else I own (well, almost everything) has Schraeder, and a domestic source really for speed of getting them and saving on shipping.
Oh, and it is a 26 x 1 3/8” tube/tire. I’m grateful for any advice you have! Just be sure to deburr the holes after. ;) |
I'm feeling the lack of love for my three speed, LOL! After years I finally had to admit it's just too small for me. Found a replacement bike for it and posted it locally. Down to asking a give away price and still no love for it. I got a feeling it's going to wind up as a donation to the bike coop. :ride:
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...4f3d37fa37.jpg Rough old girl but she get's the job done. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.