Mountain or Otherwise ?
I'd be the first to say I'm not much for labels, but wondering what you guys would label this bike as. Or maybe the better question is what was Cannondale thinking as far as this bike ? It seems like its caught in no mans land to me. Not that it much matters as I will just enjoy it as a light trail bike until such time to move it along.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...c79304471d.jpg |
That is certainly 100% a mountain bike.
|
+1 for mountain bike
|
Mountain Bike.
It was not a particularly good one, but that is absolutely what it was intended for. |
What about that bike would lead the OP to label it as "not" a mountain bike?
|
Light trail bike is a perfect usage for that bike. It's a mountain bike, no question. But it's a very early full suspension design, with a Hedshok and limited travel. Trying to take it down blue/black trails at a mountain bike park is not advisable.
|
airplane :P
|
Originally Posted by c_m_shooter
(Post 21683735)
What about that bike would lead the OP to label it as "not" a mountain bike?
I assume the travel is pretty limited, which is why I question it. More of a curiosity than anything. |
No matter what you think of it today, this was definitely a serious downhill bike at the time. The Headshok was an early effort in 1992, when everyone’s forks had short travel. It was a real commitment as other forks were retrofit but the Headshok required a matching frame. There were versions that were as fully featured as any regular fork that lasted into the late 2000’s. They also made dual crown forks with more travel but not til 1997. Later on the Headshok was limited to hybrids. The short travel available from the steerer tube is why they later turned it into the Lefty in Y2K.
|
60mm of travel was big deal in the mid 90's.
|
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
(Post 21686694)
No matter what you think of it today, this was definitely a serious downhill bike at the time. The Headshok was an early effort in 1992, when everyone’s forks had short travel. It was a real commitment as other forks were retrofit but the Headshok required a matching frame. There were versions that were as fully featured as any regular fork that lasted into the late 2000’s. They also made dual crown forks with more travel but not til 1997. Later on the Headshok was limited to hybrids. The short travel available from the steerer tube is why they later turned it into the Lefty in Y2K.
Yes, the Headshock was a very good XC fork. But in this case it was bolted to a sub-par bike. |
Originally Posted by Kapusta
(Post 21683079)
Mountain Bike.
It was not a particularly good one, but that is absolutely what it was intended for. |
Originally Posted by sdn40
(Post 21686648)
Mainly the front headshok. Cannondale has used it on other models, but none on a pure "mountain bike" IIRC.
I assume the travel is pretty limited, which is why I question it. More of a curiosity than anything. |
Over kill for light trail riding* but you should be comfy while doing it..
*a hardtail + a suspension seat post should be sufficient.. |
It's the kind of bike that fits into the category:
Classic - Needs a dropper post and willing rider that fits it to see what it can really do. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.