Dropper on a pure road bike
This isn’t a gravel or CX post (pun sort of intended).
How about a dropper on a friggin road race machine? I think of the times I’ve been going 50+ and I could get more but I’m too chicken for the super tuck. If I lowered my butt 2-4” would that appreciably change my aero profile? I ride an 18 lb steel bike and to go less than that would be very very expensive. I probably couldn’t justify making it a 19lb bike for this. So this is mostly hypothetical. Seems like the folks on 13lb bikes would still be super light with a dropper. I’m sure pros could hit 6.8Kg and have one. Did I see them on neutral bikes a few years ago? All riders are different heights I suppose. I guess we’ll know it helps if UCI bans them. |
I certainly could have done with a dropper post today. 4000 m of steep descents with some 25% ramps. I’m not that fussed about the aero, but a dropper would have made these descents so much more comfortable. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them on endurance road bikes in the near future. Even on the flat I prefer my saddle a little lower than climbing, especially when fatigue sets in on a long ride.
|
I think GCN has some videos about this topic.
|
Show the 18lb bike with pedals on ... hanging from a scale, and we'll go from there.....
|
Originally Posted by trailangel
(Post 22137636)
Show the 18lb bike with pedals on ... hanging from a scale, and we'll go from there.....
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...477390800.jpeg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...0d4129ec1.jpeg What this has to do with anything, I dunno. Only playing your game because I’ve never seen you post anything that’s not condescending. Your turn. |
Originally Posted by trailangel
(Post 22137636)
Show the 18lb bike with pedals on ... hanging from a scale, and we'll go from there.....
Of course nobody wants to add weight unless there is a useful trade-off, but I suspect a dropper post could earn its keep on a lot of road bikes. I was a fairly early adopter of mtb dropper posts in 2005 (original Gravity Dropper!) and I remember the usual scepticism of something “different/new” in the bike world. Now they are standard issue and for good reason. |
Although I did before they were commonplace, I couldn't imagine riding trails on my full-sus without a dropper post these days.
I'm sure at some point we'll see a road bike or two with a dropper, especially if you go with the AXS wireless version so no extra cabling needed. They'd be more useful / at home on a gravel type bike rather than a pure roadie though. Unless somebody is looking to eek out every last drop of downhill aero speed without supertucking, I doubt the cost and weight penalty is worth it. |
Originally Posted by tempocyclist
(Post 22137784)
Although I did before they were commonplace, I couldn't imagine riding trails on my full-sus without a dropper post these days.
I'm sure at some point we'll see a road bike or two with a dropper, especially if you go with the AXS wireless version so no extra cabling needed. They'd be more useful / at home on a gravel type bike rather than a pure roadie though. Unless somebody is looking to eek out every last drop of downhill aero speed without supertucking, I doubt the cost and weight penalty is worth it. I could see how it might help on a road bike on super twisty roads or steep descents because I'm way up in the air compared to most. btw I think the AXS post is $800! |
I'll tell you how you do a super light dropper on a road bike - a modified version of the Zipp beam. Of course, the damn UCI would need to get out of the way...
Another use aside from allowing a more aero tuck would be to allow you land a big drop-off - seat height is definitely the limiting factor for that; more than a foot gets pretty silly fast. But the rest of the bike can hack it, as evidenced by all those Road Bike Party vids. |
I just took my dropper off of my gravel bike. I almost never used it and it added a ton of weight and - even worse - it was jarringly stiff and extremely uncomfortable on long rides. I replaced it with a carbon post with a good amount of flex and the ride is so much better (not an issue on a MTB with low pressure tires and plush suspension). Droppers have become almost necessary on current mountain bikes due their geometry. We didn't really need them on the 80s and 90s MTBs, but the new bikes are completely different. I can't imagine putting one on my road bike.
|
Just get a seat post quick release and raise and lower you seat on the fly. Weighs nothing.
|
Originally Posted by Kimmo
(Post 22137815)
I'll tell you how you do a super light dropper on a road bike - a modified version of the Zipp beam. Of course, the damn UCI would need to get out of the way...
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/MH...80-80.jpg.webp https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/E9...68-80.jpg.webp https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/r...ts-2017-339419 |
^ That's actually a pretty neat use of dropper posts on road bikes! I must have missed that. Pretty sure the new Shimano neutral service bikes don't have droppers.
Originally Posted by Kimmo
(Post 22137815)
Another use aside from allowing a more aero tuck would be to allow you land a big drop-off - seat height is definitely the limiting factor for that; more than a foot gets pretty silly fast. But the rest of the bike can hack it, as evidenced by all those Road Bike Party vids.
Can't say I've ever needed to tackle a foot or higher drop on my road bike, the roads much bet a lot worse where you are. :D |
Dropper post really will not go with that bike. Forget about the idea for a dropper on this bike.
|
0 interest in a dropper post for my road bikes. The hills arent long enough for me to stop pedaling for a long enough time to tuck and make an even lower position worth it. The tuck time is under a minute as it is, so a dropper would give me what...1.125 seconds faster down the hill?...maybe? Meanwhile I have a dropper post on my road bike and all the common issues/complaints that come with em. Lower level gear then copies the look of costly gear and suddenly clunky poorly designed cheap droppers are on entry road bikes and are basically unusable.
Nope, no interest in anything close to that version playing out. Its a road bike, I dont need to get my weight back behind the saddle. Along these lines, I also dont have a dropper on my gravel bike because gravel roads are just unpaved roads. If someone wants to underbike and use their gravel bike on technical difficult MTB terrain, I guess a dropper would be good. |
Originally Posted by cmon4day
(Post 22137986)
Just get a seat post quick release and raise and lower you seat on the fly. Weighs nothing.
|
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 22138298)
Along these lines, I also dont have a dropper on my gravel bike because gravel roads are just unpaved roads. If someone wants to underbike and use their gravel bike on technical difficult MTB terrain, I guess a dropper would be good.
|
Originally Posted by mattcalifornia
(Post 22137977)
Droppers have become almost necessary on current mountain bikes due their geometry. We didn't really need them on the 80s and 90s MTBs, but the new bikes are completely different.
Still, some of the top XC racers don't use droppers and those that do use short travel (80mm) models. They typically add about 200 grams. An XC course isn't an Enduro course and I doubt any Enduro racers go without a dropper. When I've ridden my mtb on a steep, twisty paved road I will drop the saddle a couple inches. It feels more like a motorcycle and lowers my center of gravity. If I ever had one on a road bike it would be for this reason and not to make a lower tuck for descending speed. Probably never do it, though. |
Originally Posted by mattcalifornia
(Post 22138391)
I occasionally ride some more technical MTB trails on my gravel bike, and I still don't want a dropper. I can get my weight back far enough without it. The bigger issue for me is that the brakes just aren't as good as 4-piston MTB brakes and the brake lever positioning on drop bars just isn't as good as a flat bar MTB. And, obviously, the lack of plush suspension. Point being that a dropper post doesn't turn a gravel bike into a MTB anyway.
|
As a tall guy who sits way up high, I could see the benefit for lowering center of gravity on winding descents. On the other hand, I'm a bit of a chicken and tend to sit up as much as possible to scrub height when the speed/turns get too much for me. On the other, other hand, after getting hit while riding a couple months back, once I am physically able to get back in the saddle (and get a bike with a saddle to get back in), I'll probably be spending most of my miles on Zwift (or similar) for quite some time so actual height/center of gravity won't be an issue.
|
Just supertuck man, its not scary when you get used to it. I supertuck probably 20-30 minutes a week and feel very stable
|
Originally Posted by big john
(Post 22138411)
What about on a super steep descent, wouldn't it help there or do you just hang off the back of the saddle?
|
I've read of bike racers lowering their saddle on snowy or muddy or gravelly stretches in the past, so I'm sure they would have appreciated a dropper post. :)
|
Originally Posted by mattcalifornia
(Post 22138481)
I just hang off the back of the saddle like I did on my MTB in the 80's and 90's. It's a rare occurrence anyway, and the dropper is usually the least of my concerns at that point -- the brakes, tires and lack of suspension are typically bigger issues.
I thought a dropper might be useful on a gravel bike when things get sketchy or steep. |
Originally Posted by big john
(Post 22138506)
I don't have a gravel bike but I have gone on rides where there were other people on them. None of them had droppers but the roads we were on were not super steep or technical. I would get a gravel bike if I knew friends were available to ride with.
I thought a dropper might be useful on a gravel bike when things get sketchy or steep. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.