![]() |
Originally Posted by DQRider
(Post 19251277)
Interesting. According to the brochure, the "shpg weight" for that bike was 43 lbs. Folks here were just discussing the different frame materials between Schwinn and Raleigh, and how the Schwinns were notably heavier. That seems to support the theory. Has anyone here weighed a similarly-equipped Raleigh Sports?
BTW, this bike is at the top of my "Bucket List" - not that it is any better than a nice Raleigh but it is oh so much rarer! Also, those Bluemel's fenders are not correct on the bike to the best of my knowledge. Maybe a Schwinn aficionado can enlighten us... |
Originally Posted by DQRider
(Post 19251277)
Interesting. According to the brochure, the "shpg weight" for that bike was 43 lbs. Folks here were just discussing the different frame materials between Schwinn and Raleigh, and how the Schwinns were notably heavier. That seems to support the theory. Has anyone here weighed a similarly-equipped Raleigh Sports?
|
Originally Posted by PalmettoUpstate
(Post 19251823)
BTW, this bike (Schwinn Paramount three speed) is at the top of my "Bucket List" - not that it is any better than a nice Raleigh but it is oh so much rarer! Also, those Bluemel's fenders are not correct on the bike to the best of my knowledge. Maybe a Schwinn aficionado can enlighten us...
|
Originally Posted by teisco
(Post 19251304)
Of course the Paramount would be the ultimate but way out of my price range. Is a beauty though.
|
Originally Posted by adventurepdx
(Post 19251837)
According to the flickr photo album description that I posted above, this Paramount is a restoration project. Not only does it have some different parts than stock (like the wheels) but it was repainted.
|
Originally Posted by PalmettoUpstate
(Post 19251844)
Did you do the resto?
I'm just simply reposting something interesting that I found on the internets. Guess I didn't make myself clear. But to make myself clear, I have no connection to this bike or the person behind it. |
Originally Posted by thumpism
(Post 19251276)
Can you believe they'd leave the PV locknut like this?!? For shame!
Attachment 545846 |
Originally Posted by adventurepdx
(Post 19251851)
Oh gosh, no. You don't want me to get near bikes like this! :)
I'm just simply reposting something interesting that I found on the internets. Guess I didn't make myself clear. But to make myself clear, I have no connection to this bike or the person behind it. Seriously, I have been looking for one of these - primarily using the "secret" Google Alert method that Tom Reingold shared a few years back - and they just don't show up. @noglider ha-ha! |
Originally Posted by PalmettoUpstate
(Post 19251862)
Well it's beautiful work. Problem is, from my point of view, it's a beautiful "Frankenbike"...
|
Originally Posted by adventurepdx
(Post 19251853)
Because it's not really a bike thread on an internet forum until someone points out what's wrong with it! :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by adventurepdx
(Post 19251867)
I get that. I sort of figured that someone would point out what's "wrong" with this bike, since whomever this is didn't try to restore it exactly like it would be from 1951. But I'm okay with that, as to me, it's the spirit that counts and it looks good. It's a lot better than the 40's Schwinn Superior that was posted on Portland CL for a bit, where the owner put 700C wheels and a modern cotterless crankset on there. And my 1968 Raleigh Superbe has a bunch of new bits on it that wouldn't have been available back then, but still looks the part. To each their own.
Peace. |
1899 Schwinn Quad - best of all - it's a 3-speed!
http://schwinncruisers.com/catalogs/...n_model_41.jpg |
Originally Posted by adventurepdx
(Post 19251833)
I'm wondering if that shipping weight is including all accessories and the shipping box/crate. The Paramount is chromoly, so the frame itself should theoretically be noticeably lighter than a similar Raleigh.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gJzn-gSPw...029_172245.jpg https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eIDW1z9At...022_170143.jpg |
Originally Posted by SirMike1983
(Post 19252072)
Yes, I believe it does include the shipping materials. The chromoly Continental I have is noticeably lighter than a Raleigh Sports. Just about everything is lighter, particularly the frame, fenders and wheelset. I would say the Paramount might be even a bit lighter than that. I was surprised how light the Continental was when I got it.
|
@PalmettoUpstate, if you include other craigslist sites than your local one, you'll see them. I see plenty of nice 3-speeds for sale here, though they're not cheap. The high asking prices seem fair, though, especially if you'll be riding the bike and locking it up outside. It's a durable, theft-resistant bike.
|
A buddy of mine has an early Paramount set up as a 3-speed. It's a very cool bike:
https://c8.staticflickr.com/9/8278/2...53374033_z.jpgIMG_2777.JPG https://c8.staticflickr.com/9/8138/3...a2ed7e5b_z.jpgIMG_2786.JPG https://c6.staticflickr.com/6/5340/3...a744a537_z.jpgIMG_2787.JPG https://c7.staticflickr.com/6/5613/2...064085d8_z.jpgParamount.jpg |
Originally Posted by BigChief
(Post 19252401)
Where do you find these great bikes? Oh well, a cro-mo Brit club bike was always on the top of my wish list and I haven't found one of those either. Good thing I'm on a roadster kick. Still some of them around.
I think you are right that the Continental, Superior, and Paramount bikes of the 1930s- early 50s are more like an English Clubman level than a Sports. I think the New World sort of goes to the same level as the Sports. |
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 19253325)
A buddy of mine has an early Paramount set up as a 3-speed. It's a very cool bike:
https://c6.staticflickr.com/6/5340/3...a744a537_z.jpgIMG_2787.JPG |
I've seen those integrated headset cups on other bikes from that era, but I don't know how common it is. @rhm might know better than I.
|
Originally Posted by desconhecido
(Post 19254026)
That is a very cool bike with a very interesting headset arrangement. Do you know that headset all fits together? Looks like it's part of the lug -- must be something pressed into it, I'd guess.
http://velobase.com/CompImages/Heads...CAB7B4390.jpeg Don't be distracted by the fact that this Chater Lea headset uses a headclip rather than the usual threaded upper race. The three circles at the bottom of the photo are the frame races and the fork crown race. Each of the frame races fits snugly into a recess in the head lug, which is why the lug has that bulge. The races are not conical; the bearing surface is a circular channel that may be filled with oil, rather than grease. I suspect --I speculate-- that that is the feature that made these attractive to racers. At that time, some racers thought oiled bearings would spin faster than greased ones, which is why hubs, bottom brackets, and even headsets and pedals had oil ports. |
Anybody need a new-ish men's Sports in 23"? I think he's wrong about the year.
MENS 1972 RALEIGH LTD 3 BIKE MENS 1972 RALEIGH LTD 3 BIKE - $159 (CHESTER) https://images.craigslist.org/00q0q_...aT_600x450.jpg NICE EXCELLENT SHAPE |
So this isn't a Raleigh 3-speed as Frank Bowden might have intended, but I came across a somewhat rough 1973 Super Course a few weeks ago for small money and decided to build it up as an English club bike using parts I had on hand. The rear wheel is a 700c Matrix rim laced to a Sturmey Archer alloy AM hub with AW internals (yeah, kind of an odd story). Front is a matching rim laced to a Normany high-flange alloy hub with S-A wing nuts. Williams crankset, Challenge 30mm Eroica tires, top tube trigger modified from an S-A downtube shifter and an old clamp, Brooks B17 and SR/Raleigh post, GB bars and Titan stem, Weinmann levers and Weinmann 750 cp brakes, Honjo fenders. I've only had it out for a short test ride as we're in the midst of a cold snap, but it felt smooth.
https://c5.staticflickr.com/1/717/30...2c11c3e9_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman1 https://c5.staticflickr.com/1/575/31...87c72c98_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman3 https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/460/31...677e1386_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman4 https://c7.staticflickr.com/1/579/31...6d60e23e_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman5 https://c7.staticflickr.com/1/140/30...a4da0c19_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman6 https://c7.staticflickr.com/1/272/30...2afffd51_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman7 https://c8.staticflickr.com/1/306/30...c174d9fd_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman10 https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/514/31...8b1495a0_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman9 |
Hercules, Not 3 Speed, But Nice
I think it is overpriced mainly due to the missing chaincase.
1929/1930 Hercules Popular single speed, perfect mechanical condition |
I forgot to mention the headlight.
|
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 19255195)
So this isn't a Raleigh 3-speed as Frank Bowden might have intended, but I came across a somewhat rough 1973 Super Course a few weeks ago for small money and decided to build it up as an English club bike using parts I had on hand. The rear wheel is a 700c Matrix rim laced to a Sturmey Archer alloy AM hub with AW internals (yeah, kind of an odd story). Front is a matching rim laced to a Normany high-flange alloy hub with S-A wing nuts. Williams crankset, Challenge 30mm Eroica tires, top tube trigger modified from an S-A downtube shifter and an old clamp, Brooks B17 and SR/Raleigh post, GB bars and Titan stem, Weinmann levers and Weinmann 750 cp brakes, Honjo fenders. I've only had it out for a short test ride as we're in the midst of a cold snap, but it felt smooth.
https://c5.staticflickr.com/1/717/30...2c11c3e9_z.jpg1973_SC_Clubman1 |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.