Old 07-02-18, 07:42 AM
  #2  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by Spartan420
Ive been doing Trainerroad for 6 weeks. Most of the workouts are high cadence with less force on the pedals. Yesterday, I switched it up and did a low cadence but with the same power. I was wondering if say 600Kj equated to the same calorie burn at at 99 RPM cadence and at a 72 RPM cadence? The power and speed were the same. The only difference was a lower heart rate with the lower cadence.

Example: Tray Mountain
High Cadence - Avg Cadence 95 RPM - Power - 128w - NP - 135w KJ - 691
Low Cadence - Ave Cadence 72 RPM - Power- 128w - NP - 135w KJ - 691

I want to build a little more power for hills is the reason I am going higher force, lower cadence. But, I want to know if the calorie burn is the same since I am getting less of an aerobic workout.
the calorie burn assumes a metabolic efficiency of ~25% which can vary from individual to individual and within the same individual depending on various parameters like cadence/hr/temp etc. How much you won't know unless you get tested in a lab. The difference won't be huge. Concern yourself with the training adaption, not the minimal differences in calorie burn
redlude97 is offline