Originally Posted by
OBoile
Because it's blatantly obvious.
You've should have just told me there was only one acceptable answer when you asked me what my reaction would be to the two proposed scenarios. It would have made it easier for me.
I expressed my opinion that I disagreed with the OP when he stated:
IMO it would take a person much longer to become an above-average recreational tennis player than to become an above-average recreational cyclist
Why is it so hard for you to accept that my opinion is different?