Old 04-10-22, 09:32 AM
  #82  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,485

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6286 Post(s)
Liked 4,329 Times in 2,425 Posts
Originally Posted by SoSmellyAir
Sorry, cyccommute, the two underlined portions seem to be contradictory. How does one control the performance of one's product without some testing regarding the effect on the efficacy of the lubricant? I understand your point that perhaps 50% of the cleanliness gives you 90% of the performance, but it would behoove the wax maker to point this out so it can sell more wax.
Not contradictory at all. The wax manufacturers want you to clean the chain before using their product so that you don’t introduce something into the wax that could change the characteristics they want. They don’t want you to “contaminate” their wax. That’s the reason they suggest extensive cleaning of a new chain.

Their cleaning protocol probably sprung fully formed from their minds without any testing of the needs of their steps. The most rudimentary tests would be to remove steps, test the chain after lubrication, remove (or replace) another step, test, etc. They just thought up a cleaning method and went with it. They really have no idea if it’s needed or not.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline