View Single Post
Old 07-05-22, 12:24 PM
  #125  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,145

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4073 Post(s)
Liked 7,665 Times in 3,076 Posts
Originally Posted by ofajen
Just a reminder that the internal power requirement of pedaling (just moving legs, feet and pedals in a circle but applying no external power to the pedals) is a sharply increasing function of pedal rate.

Formenti’s published data covers 50 rpm to 110 rpm and matches a cubic function quite nicely. It’s about 1.0 W/kg at 110 rpm. Assuming that the power remains a cubic function at higher rpm, it will be 3 W/kg at 160 rpm and 6W/kg at 200 rpm. That’s just the overhead of keeping feet in position to apply power.

The power you apply to bike and rider and that your meter measures is on top of that. By way of comparison, at 70 rpm it runs about 0.3 W/kg and at 90 rpm it runs about 0.6 W/kg.
Don't cloud the issue with science.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe: