View Single Post
Old 12-13-22, 04:49 PM
  #75  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,180

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5064 Post(s)
Liked 8,352 Times in 3,945 Posts
Originally Posted by jonathanf2
Yeah, use your brain. Bigger cassette to attack the hills, larger chainring to go faster on the flats. Plus not all us cyclists are scrawny weenies who attack hills in saddle, some of us actually have muscle to power up with the big chainring.
Your logic isn't following, Jonathan. Using a larger chainring will negate (or mostly negate) the lower gearing you got by going with a larger cassette. Your only gain would be at the higher end. Especially considering our part of the world isn't flat, a 1x becomes a compromise where you lose range at both ends of the spectrum, and have wider jumps in the middle. If that compromise works for you, that's cool, but understand that it's still a compromise.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Eric F is offline