Old 08-18-23, 09:49 PM
  #80  
BikePower
Time Traveler
 
BikePower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 331

Bikes: 1983 Ross Paragon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 207 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
Take it a bit further with a 190 lb. bike. See the trend? On paper, the 180 lb. rider has 20 lbs. more muscle to move 20 lbs less bike. How about 160 lb. rider/20 lb. bike vs 180 lb. rider/40 lb. bike?
Even 3-4 lbs. make s bike "feel" sportier and accelerate faster/easier.
160lb rider on 20lb bike is 180lb of mass, 180 and 40 is 220lb mass. I guess like anything else its power to weight ratio that matters and the bike generates no power so its better to have 20lbs of weight generating no power than 40lbs of weight generating no power. So that kinda makes sense now.
BikePower is offline