View Single Post
Old 01-31-24, 11:18 PM
  #19  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,577

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7681 Post(s)
Liked 3,572 Times in 1,880 Posts
AsI see it the whole debate is artificial The whole debate over whether some riders “need” or “deserve” a bike of some specific frame material is a manufactured debate. The idea that one frame material is superior to another is a manufactured debate point.

I imagine proud pennyfarthing riders asking’ “Does that rider Deserve a safety bicycle?”

It is a bicycle. One does not “earn” the right to ride it based on mileage or speed. One earns the right to ride it by buying or otherwise acquiring it. No one needs it. Anyone who makes the effort can own it.

We can ridicule the author but so many posters actually seem to agree. Bike frame fascism is alive and well it seems
Maelochs is offline  
Likes For Maelochs: