View Single Post
Old 03-13-24, 04:05 PM
  #15  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,491
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Liked 1,231 Times in 530 Posts
Originally Posted by sean.hwy
They don't factor in height or weight just your waist size? This test seems flawed. If 170cm vs 200cm have the same waist size the 170cm person would be fatter.
They wrote in their paper that they tried BMI in place of waist size, and it had "negligible" change in the fit of the equation. This is pretty common for these types of "predictive" studies: they're just looking for the best prediction rather than to understand the "causal path." If you're familiar with "technical time series analysis" for, say, stock prices, this is very similar to that approach: you don't really care about fundamentals or other "structural, causal" relationships or why a stock price goes up or down, you only care about whether you can predict changes in it. There are other times when you're interested in understanding why something changes, especially if you want to know how to modify behavior, but evidently prediction isn't really one of those situations.

Last edited by RChung; 03-13-24 at 04:11 PM.
RChung is offline  
Likes For RChung: