Of course it’s worth asking. My opinions were offered, in part, in case there are not a lot of responses based on actual experiences. I also offered comment on what I think is a lack of complete and easy-to-to find information that should be included on the website.
As another example for one of the Cycle Oregon editions, a good number of participants expected rides to the top of some of the climbs. Some even later admitted that they went into the event with that expectation because of the route difficulty that year. After that, the website was supplemented to clearly explain that SAG is primarily intended to assist people who encounter unexpected difficulties like injuries and mechanical problems, not for those who otherwise can’t/don’t want to do the climbs, and that, as such, long waits may be involved.