Old 04-09-24, 10:51 AM
  #140  
70sSanO
Senior Member
 
70sSanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,846

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1956 Post(s)
Liked 2,201 Times in 1,339 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
"Handling" i s sort of subjective .... what exactly do you mean? Can you quantify it? Can anyone show that a bike with a heavier fork does not "handle" as well as a bike with the same geometry as a lighter-forked bike? Dos this mean that no bike with a steel fork could ever "handle" well?

Some might think that "handling" is more a matter of frame geometry, and is here being used in an undefined way to support prejudices .... or so I imagine some might think .....
I think fork weight is much to do about nothing. And the extra weight of a disc setup is the same meaningless dribble.

I would try disc brakes if I could. I think it is an upgrade. I’ve tried some bikes over the years, but nothing came close to my bone jarring Cannondale with a 74* head angle. It’s not the fork weight or material that causes it to dive into corners.

Few would want to ride it, which is more than fine with me.

John
70sSanO is offline