View Single Post
Old 04-09-24, 03:13 PM
  #15  
KerryIrons
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 518 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 660 Times in 370 Posts
Originally Posted by Tomm Willians
I’m about to ask an extremely vague question that I fully acknowledge has near limitless variables but here goes……..
Giving a general scenario of two routes of equal distance one being flat, the other having a good bit of climbing (and descending) would you be faster at one of the routes? I’m just curious if the increased speed of the descending on a climb essentially gives a similar time to riding a flat?
Doing the Death Ride for the first time this summer and doing my best to overthink it.
It’s 103 miles with of course time limits, I know what I can do a flat century in so hoping those numbers have at least some relation to what I’m facing.
No vagueness required. As others have noted, the flats are ALWAYS faster than hill. The physics are relatively simple and can be calculated with pretty high accuracy.
KerryIrons is offline