View Single Post
Old 04-12-24, 08:55 AM
  #40  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,343

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1473 Post(s)
Liked 759 Times in 390 Posts
Few more thoughts on tire balancing: 1) all wheel/ tire combos come from the manufacturer out of balance due to the weight of the valve stem, yet we don’t see all new bikes wobbling around (and good forbid new bikes with wheel reflectors); 2) if you’re riding tubeless you would need to constantly rebalance due to shifting and uneven distribution of sealant sticking inside the tire, and 3) if you’re balancing by adding weight, there is going to be a small efficiency disadvantage.

A quick search reveals no actual data to support a benefit from wheel balancing. With power meters being ubiquitous, any efficiency advantage would be pretty easy to show. A reduction in vibration might be a bit more difficult to measure but could be done with an accelerometer. Yet I see no such data.

So if you want to balance your wheel by placing the speed magnet opposite the valve stem, knock yourself out. But if you’re doing it by adding weight realize there is a price in efficiency albeit small, for no advantage that has been documented or can be perceived while actually riding by the vast majority of riders.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.

Last edited by merlinextraligh; 04-12-24 at 09:00 AM.
merlinextraligh is offline