Old 04-25-24, 02:47 PM
  #5  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,911

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1871 Post(s)
Liked 670 Times in 511 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Tapered roller bearings combine high load-handling with low friction, but are pretty fussy about alignment. Cylindrical roller bearing like used in the Stronglight A9 and Tange RollerDrive have similar load handling to tapered rollers, but slightly higher friction because of sliding contact along the roller. This makes them less costly than tapered rollers and the floating races on the Stronglight and Tange units make them more tolerant of misalignment than tapered rollers. Since a headset is not in constant rotation like a hub or bottom bracket, the slight friction isn't a functional issue. The Campagnolo Victory is essentially a Campagnolo Gran Sport headset with slightly different cosmetics. The races are parabolic ground to allow minor misalignment, and use standard balls. While not as durable in principle as a roller bearing headset, it is entirely acceptable durability in use and lower friction than either roller bearing design.
rollers or tapered rollers? Stronglight are rollers, not tapered. I don’t really know about Rudelli, but I’ve measured Stronglight needles, and they are not tapered to a degree I can measure with a digital caliper.

does it make a difference? Not sure but I think the Stronglight setup should be cheaper to manufacture. If accurately made, I’d think the Rudelli would be slightly smoother.
Road Fan is offline