Old 09-17-21, 08:49 AM
  #20  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by pdlamb
Sure, but if you build the wheel correctly you won't have fatigue from the stress dropping too low, so the correlation between tensile strength and fatigue doesn't matter anyway. No fatigue, no breakage, no dependence on tensile strength.
Which comes back to using butted spokes on the rear NDS (at a minimum) since they don't drop as much tension each cycle...

Originally Posted by Drew Eckhardt
For a given slackness tolerance tension needs are proportional to cross-sectional area.

IOW, a 1.8mm diameter spoke needs 81% of the tension on a 2.0mm spoke.

If 60 kgf is OK at 2mm, 49 kgf is just as good at 1.8mm, 38 kgf at 1.6mm, and 34 kgf at 1.5mm.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 09-17-21 at 09:07 AM.
ThermionicScott is offline