View Single Post
Old 01-04-20, 10:31 AM
  #4503  
zjrog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by DarKris
I chose them cause I was getting foot cramps when trying to run standard flat pedals for extended rides. When I switched to these I felt like my feet finally had better support and no cramping. I did multiple group rides with the Catalyst pedals and they held up very well in my experience.

The only thing for me is that on road cranks the Q factor is so narrow that I have to run these with pedal spacers. That said because of the narrow Q factor on the pedals I’m thinking about taking my large Stamp pedals from my fat bike and swapping the Catalysts to that.

Thats the other thing. I like the size large Crank brothers Stamp pedals (not the plastic ones) as an alternative to the Catalyst pedals. They aren’t as long but they are longer than most flat pedals, and they are wider which is great for me so I don’t have to run extenders.
Thanks! Dealing with my new normal, I have to change habits. Catalyst pedals are suggested on many podiatry related sites. I never liked clipless 25 years ago, and after breaking my back in a cycling crash, I can't imagine using them now. Though I do indoors on my trainer...

I have used extenders for years. Size 13 feet frequently have heel strikes on chain stays. Might happen less as I move to a midfoot style. And of course, my AFO brace in my shoe I need the clearance to keep from hitting the brace on the crank arm. I'm getting a bicycle fit through my Orthopedics physical therapy program in less than 2 weeks. See how far out of whack I am I guess.
zjrog is offline