Old 02-13-22, 03:53 PM
  #21  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,264
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1974 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by dmanthree
And riding the way you did, likely at lower speeds, actually reduced those difference. The lower the speed, the lower the RR.
Lower speeds mean less power consumed from rolling resistance, but that's true about nearly all sources of resistance to a moving vehicle. As a proportion of total resistance, rolling resistance actually tends to be higher at low speeds, except if those low speeds are due to climbing (where gravitational resistance becomes dominant).

On flat ground, the proportional increase in speed from switching to a faster tire is actually higher for a slow rider than a fast rider.
HTupolev is offline