Originally Posted by
Andrew R Stewart
Bigger is not always better...
As an amateur sometimes historian on bike stuff I frequently think about the hundred+ years of the "safety" bike's existence and that thousands on thousands of smarter then I people have already thought about and tried stuff decades ago, that we rehash as new.
For many riders a 29x3 bike is just too big, a lot of rotational weight and, for smaller bikes, challenged geometry and fit. Andy
I agree, 'for many riders'. For shorter riders I think they should scale the frame down to take 27.5x3 or even 26x3. Also fully-rigid frames are not for everybody. But it's great for me, I love my Krampus mucho, and maybe after 5-10 more years on my original green one I'd like to upgrade to a newer version with thru-axles and other frame improvements.