View Single Post
Old 04-18-24, 12:19 PM
  #25  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,899

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5887 Post(s)
Liked 2,730 Times in 1,524 Posts
Originally Posted by LV2TNDM
Every time the bike industry adds another cog, we hear the same old fears, "Man, these chains are REALLY THIN! I don't trust 'em!" (And I admit, I wonder as well.).....!
I don't know why you opted to quote me, except maybe to set up a strawman to argue against. Nobody, and certainly not me, said that modern chains are weak or otherwise not up to the task. Doubly so here, since in the last post before yours I mentioned that breakage is a freak event, and the OP needs or focus his worries on wear rather than breakage.

That said, chains are in fact getting weaker (thought still up to the task). When I started in the bike industry 1400kgf was the accepted standard for chain strength. Later that was 1200kgf, and most recently I see references to 800kgf. That's still much higher than what's needed, but if I may offer an analogy. It's like visiting the grand canyon and walking to some of the lookout vantage points. No problem for the sure footed, but as you get closer to the edge, the risk of falling off if you should slip or trip increases. Doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't venture close, just that you need to be more careful.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 04-18-24 at 12:26 PM.
FBinNY is online now