Old 10-29-20, 10:23 AM
  #8  
flangehead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 895

Bikes: 2017 Co-op ADV 1.1; ~1991 Novara Arriba; 1990 Fuji Palisade; mid-90's Moots Tandem; 1985 Performance Superbe

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 390 Post(s)
Liked 572 Times in 332 Posts
Originally Posted by billridesbikes
Whaaaat? Who thought that was a good idea anyway?
Probably no one, but it is a crack in the transportation code, so the Texas Legislature owns it. I met a cyclist who was hit in a crosswalk and the driver who attempted a right turn on red was not charged. I presume it is because she was not a pedestrian.

The right-of-way at crosswalks is addressed in Chapter 552 and it is all about pedestrians. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/D...htm/TN.552.htm

However, "(3) "Pedestrian" means a person on foot." https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/D...htm/TN.541.htm

.. and they gotcha on the technicality...

Thanks for asking; the legislature will convene next year and I need to reconnect with the people pushing to change the law. Good reminder.

But at the end of the day, it really isn't about whether a motorist is charged with a misdemeanor. It is really about no one getting hurt. The Venn diagram of laws and safety only have a partial overlap..

Last edited by flangehead; 10-29-20 at 11:03 AM. Reason: clarify collision situation and real safety
flangehead is offline  
Likes For flangehead: