Originally Posted by
jadocs
That was a reference to people who are saying that they don’t spend a lot of money on cycling and therefore cycling is an inexpensive hobby. Just because someone is frugal (or doesn’t spend a lot of money) doesn’t mean cycling as a hobby is cheap. This whole argument is dumb.
Why is it dumb? Why throwing an insulting word to make your point? One could argue just the opposite (and some have done just that)/ Cycling is cheap and spending money or arguing otherwise is dumb