View Single Post
Old 12-01-22, 02:18 PM
  #6  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 862
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times in 234 Posts
Originally Posted by Shadco
Dont think 2001 frame details don’t matter since the newer frame is a 2011 frame.

.
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
Glad to hear that riders didn't suffer in the incident (and I rarely call a bike crash an accident). Been there and did that a few times myself (walking home with the bike on one's shoulder gives one a lot of time to reconstruct the incident and see how they contributed to the crash).

While I have worked in Trek shops I never bothered to do the homework of comparing model year versions and how much remained the same or were deferent WRT swapping over parts. The BB shell, head tube and steerer, brake caliper spec, cable routing and adjusters could all be deferent enough to not play nice. Also know that in 2001 tire widths and the frame clearances were pretty tight. If you are hoping to run 28mm tires or wide rims do that check before spending $. I will also suggest having the 2001 frame and fork inspected by someone who knows about carbon and its failure modes before your $ leaves your hands. Andy


Senior moment?
KCT1986 is offline