View Single Post
Old 04-18-21, 09:05 PM
  #22  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,529

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
When I'm curious about a result, I look at my data. I have both power and HR on one bike, but only HR on the other. In either case, I look at time in zone to assess my fitness. Last Sunday, I was in zones 4/5 for 1:15 - I was really fresh. This Sunday I was OK, but not all that fresh and the total was about 1:00 with the same amount of Z5. That data tells me if I was in condition and well enough rested to make a serious effort. Without data, it's like "who knows?" These were both fairly hilly rides of about 3 hours. On rides of that length, I can usually manage about a .8 intensity number and have ridden to exhaustion. IME, that's a good way to get stronger. Of course one first has to have the aerobic conditioning to make that possible, so that's where to start: aerobic volume/week. I'm 75.

I wouldn't blame the weight gain too much. You can run your numbers through this calculator: Bicycle Speed (Velocity) And Power Calculator
I suspect that 10 lbs. might cost you .3 mph on a long 10% climb
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline