Old 06-07-21, 06:38 AM
  #13  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,440

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3143 Post(s)
Liked 1,707 Times in 1,031 Posts
Originally Posted by Sorcerer
The thing about titanium frames I'm divided upon is that they are frozen in time in geometry and standards.
[size=33px]
[/size]
Huh? I don’t think that is true. Ti is built to the same geo and standards as any other bike material. Want slacker HTA and greater tire clearance for gravel? No problem. T47 bottom bracket shell or BB386? No problems. Needless to say, tapered HTs and steerer tubes, thru-axles, flat mount discs, Di2 ports, and bits like that are all pretty standard spec on Ti frames.

Even design and aesthetic standards are up-to-date, with oversized and heavily shaped tubes being commonly used.

But maybe you have something else in mind?
chaadster is offline