View Single Post
Old 03-25-23, 09:38 AM
  #31  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by smontanaro
Understood, but my knee will also be in greater flexion at the top of the pedal rotation. There is probably a happy middle somewhere.
Skip, it looks like you face a trade off between "tighter" knee closure angle due to higher TDC foot position with the longer crank arm, and more rocking of your hips on the seat as your leg stretches down an extra few mm to reach the pedal and finish a good power stroke. I doubt there's a generic solution to that dilemma. In my self-fitting I strive for ust enough pedal extenstion that I'm not driving my foot into the pedal at BDC. Usually this results in low hip rocking with 172.5s or 170s. I find 170s a little more comfortable overall.

Another question is, which choice makes it easier to pull your foot back at bottom, and to (perhaps more affected) push your foot over the top for a little earlier start at the power stroke. I could see the longer arm and tightened knee angle affecting how the start of the downstroke works.
Road Fan is offline