View Single Post
Old 09-26-22, 03:54 PM
  #10  
alcjphil
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,925
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1818 Post(s)
Liked 1,693 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
You missed the "just about" lead to my statement. Freewheels come in 3 common width ranges. 5s, 6s/7s (7s is narrower and overall f/w width is the same as 6s) & 8s. So yes, an older 5s derailleur will likely have less trvel raange, but they allow for a degree of over travel, and it MAY work if you're lucky.

OTOH - SRAM as a company didn't exist in the 5s era, so any SRAM RD will have travel distance for at least 8s, and more likely 8s. If using a friction lever (not index), that compatibility won't be an issue, except that it's barely possible that the inner (low gear) limit may not be restrictive enough, but that can be worked around if/when it arises.

Indexing makes things more complicated, because the lever, derailleur and freewheel spacing MUST be compatible with each other. FYI 5s and 6s f/w spacing is the same, so if you want index look for a 6s system.

FWIW - sounds like you're working on a sow's ear, so don't waste money trying to make it more that it is. Find a derailleur with adequate capacity, and set it up to work with the friction lever that's there.
Agree. As usual a very good explanation of those times. Indexing introduces all kinds of compatibility issues if parts are not designed to work together. Friction shifting is much more forgiving if the user is willing to learn how to use it. The one thing omitted was the Ultra 6 freewheels that had 7 speed spacing and could be used on a bike frame with the 120 mm dropout spacing of bikes that had 5 speed freewheels
alcjphil is offline